This would have also affected GMís sales in China, a ridiculously huge market for all manufacturers. So what GM purportedly did was that GM made false statements that its consent was somehow required and that it would oppose any agreement with Youngman.
On December 19, 2011, having been wrongfully deprived by GM of a means to secure further funding, Saab was forced to file for bankruptcy liquidation. Further stating their case, the 2013 Saab 9-3 was based on new non-GM based technology and Saab discontinued the GM-based 9-3 and 9-5 by then.
Anyway, let the legal circus carry on and hope that a verdict is reached soon. I however would like to comment on why the US$3 billion figure was deemed an appropriate sum for the lawsuit. According to reports the amount was based on the projected 2016 value of Saab. Quite an ambitious sum as Saab basically made 32,000 cars in 2010 before the company was declared bankrupt.
Of course, lawyers and people of interest would like such rosy figures to pad up their file but Iíve mentioned before, and many other people have mentioned before that Saab appeals to architects, artists and maybe borderline lunatics who somehow refuse to buy proper luxury cars from say, Audi, Mercedes Benz and BMW.
Or people who somehow think that Volvos arenít Scandinavian cool enough for them. And looking at car buying trends even in places where Saab was traditionally strong, like in the United States theyíve done so much more wrong than right.
Over in the States, Saab was once a favourite in the cooler northern America where people wanted a car that could travel through snow and wet conditions. That was taken over by Subaru to an extent. One that Saab basically never recovered from.
So even if the new, replacement Saab 9-3 came out, no one would actually know whether the cars will be accepted by the car buying public or not. I personally doubt if Saabís claim of having a value of US$3 billion makes sense. It could be padding so that a smaller settlement wouldnít be so small.