Jump to content


SEARCH

3

Get Strapped In

By SGCM_editorial on 22 Feb 2014

Attached Image In 1993, the Road Traffic Act made buckling-up mandatory for backseat passengers at least 1.5m in height. Anyone in the rear caught not wearing a seat belt was slapped with a $120 fine, while the vehicle’s driver would be fined the same amount and given three demerit points.
 
Despite these penalties, many people flouted the rule (and still do, to this day). The excuses given by recalcitrant passengers range from “the belts are uncomfortable” to “the back seat is safer anyway”. Others even proclaimed that they had a “safe driver”, and believed they would never get into an accident.
 
This attitude echoes the initial resistance by local motorists to the wearing of front seat belts, which became compulsory in 1981. Many, including driving instructors, argued that seat belts would hinder their chances of escaping an automobile in a serious collision, especially if their hands were injured.
 
Although the rear seat belt law was intended to enhance safety, it wasn’t all-encompassing. While every new car registered on or after January 1, 1993 had to have rear seat belts, owners of older cars weren’t required to retrofit their vehicles with extra seat belts.
 
Even though seat belts have long been proven to save lives in a car crash, they remain unpopular among rear passengers. During a one-week crackdown in 2002, for instance, the Traffic Police issued no less than 587 warnings to rear-seat occupants who did not belt up The Government stepped up its efforts to improve passenger safety seven years later, when all purpose-built MPVs (multi-purpose vehicles) had to have seat belts for each of the back seats. Specifically, every outboard seat in every rear row has to have a three-point belt, while the middle seats should be equipped with a lap belt at the very least.
 
The authorities were very serious about this new ruling, even if it did come into effect on April 1, 2009 (April Fool’s Day). The real fools, however, are the back-seat passengers who persist in not belting up. In the event of (touch wood) a bad traffic accident, they could end up being transported in the back of a vehicle exempt from Singapore’s rear seat belt law – a hearse 

This article was written by Jeremy Chua, writer for Torque. 

belt, belt up, safety belt and 2 more...

Viewed: 3,667 times

Related Blog Posts
SGCM_editorial
Written by SGCM_editorial
The editorial team will be more than happy to feature all the latest cars and news. Really.



  • 1
bellboy Feb 22 2014 10:40 AM

Because of their fixed point locations, rear seat belts are quite uncomfortable.

 

I rather face an increased probability of getting killed in a low probability scenario of accident than put it on all the time. 

drivinghazard Feb 22 2014 10:48 PM

you rather risk getting yourself killed than a little discomfort putting on the seat belt??

ManHong Feb 24 2014 03:06 PM

not that bad right? usually I'll just put a small pillow in between the belt and my chest. Not sure does it still serve its purpose or not.

  • 1
 
Car Makes

Please select a car make

Facebook Likes
   Featured Blog Post
Photo
A souped-up version of the OPPO Find X has been launched recently. With a Lamborghini badge on th...
POPULAR BLOG POSTS
Photo
The Lamborghini Huracan is not exactly a workhorse but someone has turned it into one by putting...
Photo
Marvel fans can consider Daihatsu's latest offering, the Thor. Yes, it is no spelling error....
Photo
The new Mitsubishi Lancer is set to return as a crossover and could get hybrid power. Mitsubishi...
Photo
The Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid is one of the fastest-accelerating four-door cars in the wo...
Photo
Following Audi, BMW and Mercedes, Hyundai is said to be giving its i30 a new sport package to fil...
   Lifestyle Articles