Jump to content

Saab is bleeding badly and owner Spyker is worried

Saab is bleeding badly and owner Spyker is worried

Rigval

1,666 views

monthly_04_2011/blogentry-61716-1301831406.jpg

blogentry-61716-1301831277.jpg

Saab is in deep trouble according to its owners Spyker. The Swedish car manufacturer could seriously bite the dust even after the takeover by Spyker early last year. In fact, Spyker had to let go of a major shareholding of its luxury car manufacturing arm to a UK based investment company to inject some extra capital into Saab but even this little maneuver has not stopped the bleeding. Spyker's annual report had stated that Saab's future isn't certain if they do not secure new funding. I think Saab has caused the owners of Spyker to lose out big time. It had to sell off major shares in Spyker cars and now it reveals that Saab is bleeding badly.

 

This statement is surprising as I remember writing about the Spyker-Saab deal in February 2010 where Spyker bought the beleaguered company from General Motors for a sum totaling US$74 million in cash and another US$326 million in deferred shares. Spyker took a 400 million Euro loan for Saab and another hundred million Euro loan elsewhere as backup. 400 million Euros is just part of the operating costs of Saab. Of course at that point of time Spyker wanted Saab to sell 120,000 cars per year and the bad news is Saab only managed around 80,000 or so units. It sold more cars in 2009 and obviously, selling less cars meant that Saab is in a real bad state. There was even an issue at the Saab Trollhattan plant which had to be temporarily shut down for about a day or so due to suppliers stopping the supply of parts. All of this isn't confidence building if you know what I mean.

 

According to the annual report, Saab is losing tons of money due to trying to set up new distribution networks and sales/marketing operations. While this spending of money was necessary and budgeted for in the Saab turnaround cum business plan, Spyker did not anticipate that the actual cash needed was higher than planned. There was also talk that a Russian billionaire is interested in Saab and is willing to invest 500million Euros into Saab. But this is mere speculation and nothing is solid as yet. And why someone is willing to add more money to a sinking ship is beyond me. As if Spyker's foray into Saab isn't a lesson to others already.

 

All this has basically shown that what I said in my earlier article written way, way, way back in December 2009 where I asked a simple question on Saab and its extinction at that point of time and whether it really matter to any of us?

 

I basically asked and said -




4 Comments


Recommended Comments

What is that will the production version of this car be called? Saab Odyssey?

Link to comment

There really is nothing much about Saab that is worth looking forward to at this time. It's not so much as getting the marketing and distribution network up, they got to have something to sell, something which gives the company a reason to exist.

 

There is something about Swedish designs - Volvo and Saab being one example that is a little too esoteric that they can't really find mass market support. If Saab wants to reverse it's fortune, they have to start building cars that appeals to the current taste and mass market, rather than cars that appeal to eccentrics.

 

 

Link to comment

I think Volvo understands the importance of being a little more mainstream as one can see from their recent efforts in the 60 series. They are not unattractive nor are they overpriced. Certainly lacking in badge credentials when compared against the usual suspects but still not to be ignored. I think it's the legacy that they are trying to disengage from and they are moving in the right directions at the moment. Wearnes, for eg, try their darn best to go the extra mile for their customers. I think Volvo will outlive Saab by a long time as long as Geely doesn't mess with their DNA.

 

Saab, on the other hand, hasn't quite got it yet. Esoteric is a brilliant word to describe them. They try to differentiate but failed. Didn't come up with anything in the recent 95 to excite anyone too much. I don't find the AD trying their best to woo their customers (even the SE sounds resigned about how many they can sell). I think if that's representative of the attitude of ADs for Saab, you would conclude immediately why they are not successful.

Link to comment

design and sell cars not so expensive and comparable to koreans. lol

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Is 'tiny living' really irrelevant in Singapore?

    I discussed the possibility of living in tiny houses in Singapore in an earlier blog post. But as we know, it isn't an option to begin with – no thanks, of course, to our lack of land space.  Someone also pointed out that the idea of tiny houses is "romanticised" – which, I don't deny (but hey, that's why it's a dream). While it's clear tiny houses aren't going to work out here, the concept of 'tiny living' is; not just physically but also mentally. Anyone who has lived enough years lo
×
×
  • Create New...