|
| Joint membership: You may login to MyCarForum using your sgCarMart username & password |
![]() ![]() |
|
Shouyi
Jun 21 2006, 09:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
4th Gear Posts: 668 Warn:
|
Hi,
with the rumours of a new 1.8L Dual VVT-I corolla, I am wondering what are the major differences b/w a Dual VVT-I unit and a I-VTEC DOHC unit. And which is more advanced. Let's discuss! -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://fd2motoringblog.blogspot.com/ My humble car blog. Welcomed to visit! |
|
|
|
|
Normal_aspirated
Jun 21 2006, 09:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Supercharged Posts: 6,971 Warn:
|
wow, seems like the trend of japs & koreans upsizing their engines for new models.
|
|
|
|
|
EventH
Jun 21 2006, 10:36 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,686 Warn:
|
Donno about which being more advanced.
The old Dual VVTi Altezza produce some 210hp (6MT) from 2L with 21kg.m torque. That is nearly a Honda "R" engine spec. The new Dual VVTi V6 2.5L in the Mark X (6AT) does 212hp from 2.5L but had 26.5kg.m torque at just 3800rpm. Actually toyota just need to put the 1.8L VVTLi from the SS2 Celica into the Corolla and the thing will also fly. |
|
|
|
|
Chenqien
Jun 21 2006, 10:43 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
3rd Gear Posts: 274 Warn:
|
eh dual vvt-i means cam phasing in both intake and exhaust valves...
i-vtec in the k block integra type R engine uses cam phasing only on the intake but has cam changing ( the traditional vtec where there is a wild cam ) thingy.. same concept as the vvtl-i.. the rest of the i-vtec i not so sure... both are good.. but for everyday driving there is no really need for a wild cam.. |
|
|
|
|
Gary84
Jun 22 2006, 02:24 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Turbocharged Posts: 8,935 Warn:
|
sorie...correct u abit...Mark X churning out 215bhp...
|
|
|
|
|
Odyssey02
Jun 22 2006, 04:44 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() 5th Gear Posts: 1,165 Warn:
|
i think i'll say honda produces better engines. they're renowned for it. maybe this'll be a biased viewpoint.
|
|
|
|
|
Tanjkp
Jun 22 2006, 04:54 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,332 Warn:
|
Pardon me, you mean the dual VVTi also have the higher cam lift as the the Honda Vtec ?
|
|
|
|
|
W210k
Jun 22 2006, 06:47 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() 5th Gear Posts: 1,357 Warn:
|
I don't think all Dual VVTi engines have the wild cam. It's dual because its required for the V6 engine's setup (quadcam vs DOHC for in-line engines).
Toyota's VVTi-L is more akin to Honda's i-VTEC. Both have phased valve timing and lift control. -------------------- V6 Quad-cam 24v 231 BHP RWD IL-6 DOHC 24v 192 BHP x-Drive |
|
|
|
|
Webbyboy
Jun 22 2006, 08:58 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
2nd Gear Posts: 131 Warn:
|
QUOTE Donno about which being more advanced.
The old Dual VVTi Altezza produce some 210hp (6MT) from 2L with 21kg.m torque. That is nearly a Honda "R" engine spec. The new Dual VVTi V6 2.5L in the Mark X (6AT) does 212hp from 2.5L but had 26.5kg.m torque at just 3800rpm. Actually toyota just need to put the 1.8L VVTLi from the SS2 Celica into the Corolla and the thing will also fly. There's Corolla XRS in USA with 2ZZ-GE engine but tuned to 170bhp only. on Celica GT-S/SS2 is 190bhp. add in toyota supercharger it will be bout 215bhp. adding blitz supercharger can go till like 270bhp. |
|
|
|
|
Tanjkp
Jun 22 2006, 09:08 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,332 Warn:
|
O, thks, got it. So all make now want to boost more power so as not to fall behind KR starting with DVVT.
|
|
|
|
|
Watwheels
Jun 22 2006, 09:11 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() NOS-ed Posts: 15,425 Warn:
|
VVTI-L
Sallah spelling lah! It's VVTL-i -------------------- ALWAYS GIVE 100% AT WORK: 12% MONDAY + 23% TUESDAY + 40% WEDNESDAY +20% THURSDAY + 5% FRIDAY |
|
|
|
|
Watwheels
Jun 22 2006, 09:32 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() NOS-ed Posts: 15,425 Warn:
|
Sigh! So many fancy terms, what wild cams lah ....what lift control.
Pls lah dun confuse readers can or not? @ high rpm the air intake valves will move deeper to allow more air to enter the combustion chamber (i.e when ECU detect more air hence add more fuel to produce more power). The idea is to let in more air into the combustion chamber. But there's a limit, the cams (shaft with offset lobes) cannot move the valves too deep or else they will hit the piston head. It's the same concept which u learn in secondary sch on combustion nothing fancyful like u guys mentioned. More air + more fuel + ignition = bigger combustion. This post has been edited by Watwheels: Jun 22 2006, 09:35 PM -------------------- ALWAYS GIVE 100% AT WORK: 12% MONDAY + 23% TUESDAY + 40% WEDNESDAY +20% THURSDAY + 5% FRIDAY |
|
|
|
|
EventH
Jun 22 2006, 09:39 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,686 Warn:
|
I can still remember the advert where the sheep out run the race horse.
I think the main problem with the VVTLi and wild cams vtec is that the power and torque come in (shiok feeling) at rather high rpms (5-6k) That is like the redline for a regular car. Quite tiring to drive like that day in day out. |
|
|
|
|
Tanjkp
Jun 22 2006, 09:42 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,332 Warn:
|
For those who ever read about 3 stage Vtec will know what is all about.
Not necessary need to ram to red line, 2nd stage lift came in at around 2K RPM. |
|
|
|
|
Iforu
Jun 22 2006, 09:45 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
3rd Gear Posts: 289 Warn:
|
3stages vtec is not for racing 1.
3stages = save fuel, 2k+ switch 12 to 16valves. -------------------- ================================================================================ ========= |
|
|
|
|
EventH
Jun 22 2006, 10:15 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,686 Warn:
|
The 3 charts are manufacturer figures for SS1, SS2 and USDM 2006 Civic Si respectively.
If you look at the charts, for cruising (at 3000rpm (110km/h?), both 1.8L Celicas had around 60hp while the 2.0L Civic Si had around 80hp. All the engines produce around 90-100hp at 4000rpm. Even at 6000rpm, both SS1 and SS2 produce around 140hp while the 2006 Civic Si had around 160hp. Off course the SS1 run out of power at 6k while the rest goes all the way to around 8k rpm. But who drive at 6-8k all the time ... even when overtaking? This post has been edited by EventH: Jun 22 2006, 10:16 PM
Attached File(s)
SS1.jpg ( 50.07K )
Number of downloads: 0
SS2.jpg ( 50.16K )
Number of downloads: 0
2006 USDM Civic Si.jpg ( 54.21K )
Number of downloads: 0 |
|
|
|
|
Tanjkp
Jun 22 2006, 10:20 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,332 Warn:
|
Post: 3stages vtec is not for racing 1.
3stages = save fuel, 2k+ switch 12 to 16valves. That's right, that's how it sells with economy + power. |
|
|
|
|
Tanjkp
Jun 22 2006, 10:23 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,332 Warn:
|
Thks for the charts, they are talking about max torgue, max power.
The Vtec lift don't kick in at high RPM only. Most drivers will hardly use up to that high power / RPM. This post has been edited by Tanjkp: Jun 22 2006, 10:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
EventH
Jun 22 2006, 10:27 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
5th Gear Posts: 1,686 Warn:
|
The amazing thing for the new vtec engine is that its max torque can be achieved at 3000rpm.
|
|
|
|
|
Davidtch
Jun 22 2006, 11:03 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Supercharged Posts: 5,644 Warn:
|
In modern era car technology, variable valve technology is basically split into 2 school:
1. Cam-Changing VVT; & 2. Cam-Phasing VVT. Cam-Changing VVT For eg, Honda VTEC, basically, it use the intake camshaft to vary the timing of valve. For 3 stage Honda VTEC, @ low RPM, 1 intake valve is open. @ Medium RPM, rocker arm connect both intake valve. @ High RPM, rocker arm will open both valve for a longer period. All this happen during the intake phase. Cam Phasing VVT For eg, Toyota VVT-I or BMW Vanos. Basically, otto cycle engine comprised of 4 cycle, intake, compression, explosion & exhaust. B4 VVT, all these cycle operate independantly. Under Cam Phasing VVT, there will be overlapping between this cycle. Under this set-up, Cam Phasing VVT, can be implemented in either intake valve only or both intake/exhaust. For intake valve only, during compression cycle, intake valve do not close up until piston reach certain angle. This allow more air into combustion chamber to achieve a leaner burner. This is the basic set-up for Toyota VVT-i. The i (stand 4 intelligence) allow ECU to vary the timing of intake valve depending on engine load & other factors. For intake/exhaust, compression cycle is the same as intake valve. The only difference is that exhaust valve continue to open during intake cycle. This is the basic set-up for Toyota dual VVT-I and BMW double vanos. Cam-changing + cam-phasing VVT It combine both technology during intake cycle, which allows more petrol into combustion during high RPM. This is found in Honda I-VTEC & Toyota VVTL-I. However, honda I-VTEC toward lean burning. The reason Toyota VVTL-I is not as powerful as Honda VTEC is the component used. If Toyota Celica using VVTL-I upgraded to TRD engine parts, power output will increase from 180HP to 200HP. Do rem that Toyota celica is 1.8L |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Threads
| Topic Title | Forum | Replies | Last Action | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|
General Car Discussion | 63 | Yesterday, 09:17 AM Last post by: Pisces69 |
|
![]() |
Simota Dual Spiral Jet | Performance and Tuning | 19 | 11th May 2013 - 06:24 PM Last post by: Chucky2007 |
|
![]() |
|
General Car Discussion | 31 | 25th April 2013 - 05:21 PM Last post by: Juliagezm1 |
|
![]() |
BMW 5 Series Facelift undisguised | General Car Discussion | 12 | 28th February 2013 - 02:03 AM Last post by: Mercs |
|
![]() |
Poll: Dual Citizenship For Singapore? Your Views? | Lite & EZ | 126 | 19th February 2013 - 09:11 PM Last post by: GemLeo |
|
|||||||||
| Guidelines – Terms Of Service – About Us – Moderators | Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 10:54 AM
|