Jump to content

Sunday: Undercover cops?


Iisterry
 Share

Recommended Posts

Undercover cops in Geylang.

 

Excerpt:

First, both men looked young, probably between 20 and 30 years of age. Too young to be a taxi driver in Singapore for one of them. Secondly, they wore similar, possibly identical, type of clothes. Not the formal police uniform, but in the same navy blue color nonetheless. Thirdly, and most conspicuously, they wore same type of caps in the car! Also in a navy blue color, the cap was same as the baseball cap, with a long, curved brim. But caps like this are also commonly used by army and police personnel around the world. They are customarily referred to as

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't really believe they are under-cover cops leh. The under-cover cops are not easily spotted as they just look like your neighbour next door. Some even look like a blanga or a ah-pek at GL!!! [lipsrsealed][laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

The bugger is an idiot lah. Why would anyone in the SPF want to use a taxi when we have unmarked vehicles???

 

1. Sometimes, unmarked vehicles are fully booked by others.

2. If they are AV, they can pickup streetwalkers flagging cab. Of course, the 'passenger' must alight first.

3. They may not necessary be AV, but Gambling Suppression Branch. There are also alot of illegal makeshift gaming stalls at the backlane of Gay Land.

 

A taxi vs unmarked vehicle is less conspicious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Sometimes, unmarked vehicles are fully booked by others.

2. If they are AV, they can pickup streetwalkers flagging cab. Of course, the 'passenger' must alight first.

3. They may not necessary be AV, but Gambling Suppression Branch. There are also alot of illegal makeshift gaming stalls at the backlane of Gay Land.

 

A taxi vs unmarked vehicle is less conspicious.

 

Errm if its AV or GSB, if there are no unmarked vehicles they use their own or they walk after cabbing/busing. Besides, regardless of which, being in a vehicle makes no sense in Geylang since all there are many alleys that you can't access properly in a vehicle, not to mention in the time it would take to procure a cab, they could have procured an unmarked car vehicle from central (which has another benefit). Could be PID, but their field team personnel almost like ghosts and wouldn't be spotted by some china-man driving a cab.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

taxi might good in some way....

at least it is ver common on the road, over a turn u will forget which one just cut into ur lane abrutly. unless u remember the number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Errm if its AV or GSB, if there are no unmarked vehicles they use their own or they walk after cabbing/busing. Besides, regardless of which, being in a vehicle makes no sense in Geylang since all there are many alleys that you can't access properly in a vehicle, not to mention in the time it would take to procure a cab, they could have procured an unmarked car vehicle from central (which has another benefit). Could be PID, but their field team personnel almost like ghosts and wouldn't be spotted by some china-man driving a cab.

 

Isn't it obvious that the author is anti-establishment? He might just be adding some spin on the story to make the police force look bad.

 

I mean some of the statements are absurb.

 

First, both men looked young, probably between 20 and 30 years of age. Too young to be a taxi driver in Singapore for one of them.

 

Duh. Only one of them (THE FRIGGIN DRIVER) needs to be old enough to be a taxi driver. So what if the passenger is a 5 year old child and not old enough to be a taxi driver?

Edited by Kusje
Link to post
Share on other sites

The bugger is an idiot lah. Why would anyone in the SPF want to use a taxi when we have unmarked vehicles???

This 'idiot' as you named, happens to have a PhD from Stanford and a proven track record of scientific accomplishments. ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

This 'idiot' as you named, happens to have a PhD from Stanford and a proven track record of scientific accomplishments. ^_^

 

 

A PhD from Stanford that still can't get a better job after so long ... probably has other issues not mentioned in the "proven track record".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it obvious that the author is anti-establishment? He might just be adding some spin on the story to make the police force look bad.

 

I mean some of the statements are absurb.

 

First, both men looked young, probably between 20 and 30 years of age. Too young to be a taxi driver in Singapore for one of them.

 

Duh. Only one of them (THE FRIGGIN DRIVER) needs to be old enough to be a taxi driver. So what if the passenger is a 5 year old child and not old enough to be a taxi driver?

 

because there is a minimum age to be a taxi driver.... iirc it's about 40

Link to post
Share on other sites

This 'idiot' as you named, happens to have a PhD from Stanford and a proven track record of scientific accomplishments. ^_^

 

My dir has a PhD from Oxford, and is one of Singapore's most influential and accomplished entrepreneurs.n He still considers himself an idiot in many things. Scientific accomplishments mean nothing when it comes to intelligence gathering and how this intelligence is obtained. Without knowing what (or who) to look out for, it would be quite hard to spot a proper undercover PO (not talking about normal PO on plainclothes duty).

Link to post
Share on other sites

This 'idiot' as you named, happens to have a PhD from Stanford and a proven track record of scientific accomplishments. ^_^

 

So? PhD means everything ah? Geez...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...