Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 (edited) Yo bros, as above. Compared to the traditional vacuums using filter bags, which is better? Is the bagless one a better sucker? Please share your views. Thanks! PS. Nowadays very hard to find replacement filter bags. Forgot to mention, no Dyson hor. Too expensive. Edited May 28, 2012 by Count-Bracula ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeobh 4th Gear May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 If you have no budget constraint go for Dyson cyclon vacuum cleaner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 If you have no budget constraint go for Dyson cyclon vacuum cleaner Bro, Dyson not cheap wor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 If you have no budget constraint go for Dyson cyclon vacuum cleaner Thanks bro, I know someone sure recommend Dyson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 Dyson is expensive. They all do the same job now in my opinion. We bought a Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Relacklabrudder 1st Gear May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 (edited) There is delfin brand and rainbow brand. Delfin is preferred as it uses turbine system to spin dust into water while rainbow actually use filter which may cause dust to escape somehow. Delfin gives promotion pot. Or u can use their service, been using their servicing quite gd. Edited May 28, 2012 by Relacklabrudder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pes70 Neutral Newbie May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 used to have a dyson, until recently when the motor broke down. Now using a cheap normal vacuum with bag, disposing of the dirt in a bagless vacuum is a headache, spending some money on bags is more convenient. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangadrool Supersonic May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 What I'm saying is that I've tried several different makes even the cheapest S$60 and they all work well and you don't need to buy an expensive Dyson. If u notice, normal vacuum cleaners leave a trace of fine dust around. The filters will not be able to catch all dusts, especially very fine ones. Air sucked in needs to escape and with it carries fine dusts out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
5936 1st Gear May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 Electrolux Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzy Twincharged May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 (edited) Have tried a few brands before. Still go back to Dyson. Its expensive but lasts much longer. First vacuum cleaner was a Dyson and it lasted for 6 years. The hose broke but then was replaced under warranty. Changed to other brands and all lasted between 1-2 years before the hose break and their hose all not under warranty. IMO u pay more for the Dyson but it also lasts much longer. Now can get Dyson for around $700-$900. Quite cheap already compared to last time. Edited May 28, 2012 by Nzy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 There is delfin brand and rainbow brand. Delfin is preferred as it uses turbine system to spin dust into water while rainbow actually use filter which may cause dust to escape somehow. Delfin gives promotion pot. Or u can use their service, been using their servicing quite gd. Bro, thanks for the info. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 What I'm saying is that I've tried several different makes even the cheapest S$60 and they all work well and you don't need to buy an expensive Dyson. Oh, okay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 used to have a dyson, until recently when the motor broke down. Now using a cheap normal vacuum with bag, disposing of the dirt in a bagless vacuum is a headache, spending some money on bags is more convenient. Bro, bags for the older models very hard to find. They get phased out in a year or two. Tried using the compatible bags but fit not so good and dirt tend to fly out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 My current one is an Electrolux, dust & dirt flying out due to ill fitting bag. Cannot find proper bags anymore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count-Bracula Twincharged May 28, 2012 Author Share May 28, 2012 Have tried a few brands before. Still go back to Dyson. Its expensive but lasts much longer. First vacuum cleaner was a Dyson and it lasted for 6 years. The hose broke but then was replaced under warranty. Changed to other brands and all lasted between 1-2 years before the hose break and their hose all not under warranty. IMO u pay more for the Dyson but it also lasts much longer. Now can get Dyson for around $700-$900. Quite cheap already compared to last time. Nah. Way too expensive, I saving money to give car a new coat of paint......heh heh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 Yo bros, as above. Compared to the traditional vacuums using filter bags, which is better? Is the bagless one a better sucker? Please share your views. Thanks! PS. Nowadays very hard to find replacement filter bags. Forgot to mention, no Dyson hor. Too expensive. My National 600W with washable filter still can do the basic vaccuming... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Supercharged May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 Bro, Why not just use magic clean wiper? It clean 100% dust from the floor and leave no dust behind. After use, just throw the paper into bin. No need electricity, no bulky machine and the papers are dam cheap, and it cleans faster than any vacuum Im been using it for years, with the same wiper stick. Unless u got carpet or rug that needs the vacuum, use the magic clean wiper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear May 28, 2012 Share May 28, 2012 If u notice, normal vacuum cleaners leave a trace of fine dust around. The filters will not be able to catch all dusts, especially very fine ones. Air sucked in needs to escape and with it carries fine dusts out. I believe the ideal one would be a wet & dry vaccum cleaner, since the water within helps trap the fine dust ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Durian Sellers - recommendations and to avoid
Durian Sellers - recommendations and to avoid
Electrical appliances
Electrical appliances
Heavy and rain proof curtains/blinder recommendations?
Heavy and rain proof curtains/blinder recommendations?
Recommend me a good handheld vacuum
Recommend me a good handheld vacuum
Recommendations for light kitchen carpentry and sink works
Recommendations for light kitchen carpentry and sink works
Automatic (robotic) vacuum cleaner
Automatic (robotic) vacuum cleaner
Recommendations for a commercial van
Recommendations for a commercial van
Recommendations for wall paintings
Recommendations for wall paintings