Jump to content

WP poses 29 questions for 14/4 parliamentary sitting


Baal
 Share

Recommended Posts

Supersonic

http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/04/14/wp-poses-29-parliament-questions-for-14-apr-sitting/

 

 

WP poses 29 questions for 14/4 parliamentary sitting
dmca_protected_sml_120n.pngPostDateIcon.png April 14th, 2014 | PostAuthorIcon.png Author: Contributions

WP-logo.jpgParliament resumes with questions raised on housing, health, sports, PIC, transport, defence, education, and communications.

 

 

QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWER*

 

 

*7. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs (a) whether the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority has been checking the passports of all outbound and inbound travellers at all ports of exit and entry against Interpol’s Stolen and Lost Travel Documents (SLTD) database in the last three years; (b) how many travellers have been caught using lost or stolen passports which are not their own; and © what punishments have been meted out for the commission of such offences.

 

*11. Mr Pritam Singh: To ask the Minister for Communications and Information with regard to the local pay TV rates for the FIFA World Cup 2014, whether the Ministry will consider conducting a thorough review of the regulatory framework and policies that govern the broadcast of popular soccer and sporting events in Singapore so as to better protect the interests of the viewing public.

 

*16. Mr Png Eng Huat: To ask the Minister for National Development in respect of the Parenthood Provisional Housing Scheme (a) what is the formula for pricing the rental rates for flats under this scheme; (b) what are the costs involved in providing these rental flats; © what has been the number of applications for 3-room flat types; and (d) whether the rental rates can be lowered to encourage the take-up rate for the bigger flat types.

 

*21. Ms Sylvia Lim: To ask the Minister for Health what efforts are ongoing to educate the public on the effects of the compulsory donation provisions of the Human Organ Transplant Act so as to minimise distress to family members of patients who meet the criteria for compulsory harvesting of organs.

 

*26. Mr Yee Jenn Jong: To ask the Minister for Trade and Industry (a) what is the status of negotiations on the ASEAN Economic Community goal to free up the movement of professionals; and (b) what safeguards will be put in place to protect Singapore PMETs and to ensure national control over our immigration policies.

 

*31. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) on average, what percentage of GST paid by the lowest 20% of households (by income) is offset by all forms of GST Vouchers last year; and (b) whether the Government will consider fully offsetting the GST paid by all households in the lowest quintile even in years when there are no one-off Special Payments made.

 

*33. Mr Png Eng Huat: To ask the Minister for National Development what is the roadmap to bring the Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP) to the 200 blocks of HDB flats that are currently without full lift access now that the main LUP is coming to an end in December 2014.

 

*37. Mr Yee Jenn Jong: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) whether the Ministry is satisfied with the distribution of the Productivity and Innovation Credit (PIC) claims between the six different qualifying activities; and (b) what measures does the Government have to increase the usage of PIC by companies in activities more directly related to innovation.

 

*39. Ms Lee Li Lian: To ask the Minister for Transport (a) how does LTA implement localised traffic schemes that restrict the entry of heavy vehicles to areas around schools or that have high pedestrian activity; (b) whether monitoring is done on a regular basis to assess the effectiveness of such schemes; and © whether LTA requires contractors who undertake projects to build flats or commercial projects to submit route planning for their heavy vehicles to ensure the safety of school children and residents living in the vicinity.

 

*42. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song: To ask the Minister for Defence whether the RSAF has measures in place to identify and be alerted of aircraft flying near Singapore which veer off their flight path so that they can be intercepted in time before they reach Singapore.

 

*44. Mr Yee Jenn Jong: To ask the Minister for Social and Family Development how does the Ministry track the availability of student care places in the industry and whether it will track and publish the provision of student care places as one of its key performance indicators in the Government’s Budget Book on revenue and expenditure estimates.

 

*45. Mr Png Eng Huat: To ask the Minister for Transport with regard to the introduction of ERP2 in 2020 (a) what is the roadmap to roll out the new islandwide GPS-based road pricing system and its value-added services; (b) what is the estimated cost of ERP2; and © what are the safeguards to minimise privacy issues.

 

*49. Ms Lee Li Lian: To ask the Minister for Education for Continuing Education and Training (CET) courses and National Institute of Technical Education Certificate (Nitec) and Higher Nitec courses (a) what are the current subsidised and full module fees for Singapore citizens; (b) since 2012, what is the trend of drop-out rates and the percentage of Singaporean students who drop out because they are charged full fees for repeating modules; and © whether the subsidies can be reduced instead of being withdrawn completely for repeating modules so as not to discourage learners.

 

*52. Mr Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap: To ask the Minister for National Development regarding HDB’s Public Rental Scheme (a) what is the rationale for pegging the rental rate to market rent; (b) whether the rate should be revised given market rent inflation outpacing the income growth of low-income households; and © whether the rental rate can instead be pegged to the median income of targeted income groups to ensure affordability.

 

*57. Ms Sylvia Lim: To ask the Minister for National Development whether the Government will abolish or review the resale levy payable by persons who inherit subsidised HDB flats upon the demise of the former lessees.

 

 

QUESTIONS FOR WRITTEN ANSWER

 

 

8. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance what percentage of the Net Investment Returns (NIR) on the net assets managed by Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC), Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Temasek Holdings is contributed to the Government’s Budget as Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC) for each of the last five years, given that NIRC comprises up to 50% of the NIR on the net assets managed by GIC and MAS and up to 50% of the investment income from the remaining assets (which includes those of Temasek Holdings).

 

10. Ms Lee Li Lian: To ask the Minister for Communications and Information whether IDA uses technologically advanced and more accurate methods to audit mobile network traffic logs besides drive and walk tests and, if so, what are these methods.

 

11. Ms Lee Li Lian: To ask the Minister for Communications and Information in light of drop call rates published by IDA which state that subscribers should only experience 2.7 to 4.1 dropped calls for every 1,000 phone calls that they make (a) whether this accurately reflects what subscribers are experiencing on the ground; and (b) what measures are taken to ensure that the results are in line with actual experience.

 

12. Ms Lee Li Lian: To ask the Minister for Communications and Information how does IDA conclude that the drop call rate is a measure of the availability of radio channels to handle and maintain established phone calls when there have been no tests done or monitored for the availability of radio channels based on IDA’s Quality of Service standards and performance results.

 

13. Mr Pritam Singh: To ask the Minister for Communications and Information (a) since 2005, how many Singaporeans, permanent residents and foreigners respectively have more than three pre-paid SIM cards registered under their name; and (b) how many of these pre-paid SIM card users have not topped up their SIM cards at least once in the six-month window as required for their continued use.

 

17. Ms Sylvia Lim: To ask the Minister for Law (a) how many victim compensation orders have been granted by the courts under section 359 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2012 and 2013 respectively; and (b) what is the range of compensation amounts awarded and for what types of offences.

 

18. Ms Sylvia Lim: To ask the Minister for Health in 2013, how many patients who are prescribed drugs at restructured hospitals do not collect their medication at all or do not collect the full course of their prescriptions.

 

19. Mr Yee Jenn Jong: To ask the Minister for Health (a) what content is covered in the language, orientation and immersion programmes for foreign healthcare professionals and what is the duration of such programmes; (b) how many foreign healthcare staff have attended these programmes each year in the last five years; and © what percentage of total foreign healthcare staff does this participation represent.

 

20. Mr Chen Show Mao: To ask the Minister for Health (a) what plans are there to expand the target medical and nursing intakes beyond the current 500 and 2,750 respectively; (b) what are the constraints to expanding the target intakes; and © what steps can be taken to overcome these constraints.

 

21. Mr Chen Show Mao: To ask the Minister for Health in respect of accident and emergency departments of public hospitals (a) in addition to the median waiting time for admissions to wards, whether the 95th percentile waiting time for admissions is tracked; (b) what waiting times for registration and consultation are tracked; © what an acceptable waiting time should be for registration, consultation and admission to ward; and (d) whether these waiting times can be released on a weekly basis in addition to median waiting time for admissions.

 

22. Mr Chen Show Mao: To ask the Minister for Health (a) what steps are being taken in implementing a nationwide programme for colonoscopy; (b) how much additional resources are needed in terms of facilities and number of specialists for such a programme; © whether there is a timeframe for implementing such a programme; and (d) given that screening participation rates typically take time to build up, whether the Ministry will consider running a pilot programme in the interim.

 

25. Mr Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap: To ask the Minister for Transport (a) what is the breakdown of the motorcycle population in the Class 2, 2A and 2B categories for each year from 2011 to 2013; (b) what is the amount of COE revenue collected from the three categories respectively for each year from 2011 to 2013; and © whether the Ministry will consider abolishing COEs for motorcycles in the Class 2B category as these lower capacity motorcycles are usually used by lower-income persons for work purposes.

 

27. Mr Yee Jenn Jong: To ask the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) what percentage of pre-schools are currently certified under the Singapore Pre-school Accreditation Framework (SPARK); (b) what percentage of kindergartens and childcare centres are certified under SPARK respectively; © what is the share of SPARK-certified centres from the five anchor operators; (d) what percentage of pre-schools operated by the anchor operators are SPARK-certified; and (e) whether the Ministry can provide an update on its effort to get centres tested under SPARK.

 

30. Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song: To ask the Acting Minister for Manpower how does the Government plan to raise the wages of local low-wage workers in industries other than cleaning, security and landscaping given that that there are around 110,000 employed residents in Singapore earning less than $1,000 per month (excluding part-time workers) and the enforcement of the Progressive Wage Model in these three industries is expected to impact only about 80,000 low-wage workers.

 

Source: WP Facebook page

 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/04/14/iswaran-asean-deal-wont-compromise-sg-job-opportunities/

 

 

Iswaran: ASEAN deal won’t compromise SG job opportunities
dmca_protected_sml_120n.pngPostDateIcon.png April 14th, 2014 | PostAuthorIcon.png Author: Editorial
Iswaran.png

Minister Iswaran

 

 

In Parliament today (14 Apr), Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong from the Workers’ Party asked an important question with regard to the status of the negotiations on the ASEAN Economic Community’s plan to allow free movement of professionals among ASEAN countries.

 

In particular, Mr Yee asked what safeguards the government has to ensure that Singapore professionals (i.e. PMETs) will not be crowded out.

 

Mr Yee’s question:

 

To ask the Minister for Trade and Industry:

(a) what is the status of negotiations on the ASEAN Economic Community goal to free up the movement of professionals; and

(b) what safeguards will be put in place to protect Singapore PMETs and to ensure national control over our immigration policies.

 

Even though the free movement of PMETs among ASEAN countries enables Singaporean PMETs to find jobs in other ASEAN countries without immigration hassles, the strong Singapore dollar will actually lead to ASEAN PMETs flooding Singapore, looking for jobs.

 

Here are the current exchange rates:

 

  • S$1 = 1 Dollar (Brunei)
  • S$1 = 3208 Riel (Cambodia)
  • S$1 = 9131 Rupiah (Indonesia)
  • S$1 = 6440 Kip (Laos)
  • S$1 = 2.6 Ringgit (Malaysia)
  • S$1 = 770 Kyat (Myanmar)
  • S$1 = 35.6 peso (Philippines)
  • S$1 = 25.8 Baht (Thailand)
  • S$1 = 16847 Dong (Vietnam)

 

In Myanmar, for example, it has been reported that civil servants earn an average of 100,000 kyat (S$130) a month and daily workers earn as little as 20,000 kyat (S$26) a month [Link].

 

A Myanmar maid working in Singapore by contrast earns S$450, almost 3.5 times the average salary of a civil servant in Myanmar.

 

S$2,200 – the minimum salary for a foreign PMET holding an S Pass in Singapore – works out to 1.7 million kyat a month or 17 times the average salary of a civil servant in Myanmar.

 

In other words, every month that a Myanmar PMET works in Singapore for S$2,200 a month, he is making the equivalent of almost 1.5 years’ pay for an average civil servant in Myanmar.

 

Working for 2 years in Singapore would be like working for 36 years in Myanmar for the PMET. Therefore, to Myanmar PMETs, Singapore is heaven. Who in ASEAN does not want to come to Singapore to work?

 

 

Iswaran’s reply

 

 

Replying to Mr Yee’s question, Second Minister for Trade and Industry S Iswaran said that under the ASEAN Agreement on the Movement of Natural Persons, Singapore is committed to allowing the entry of intra-corporate transferees at the level of managers, executives and specialists.

 

Entry for these intra-corporate transferees is limited to a 2-year period that may be extended for up to 3 additional years each time for a total term not exceeding 8 years.

 

Given Singapore’s low unemployment rate, Mr Iswaran said that allowing selected skilled labour from ASEAN to work here temporarily enables Singapore to fill skill gaps, without compromising the job opportunities of local PMETs.

 

He assured the House that measures are in place to foster a level playing field for Singaporean PMETs, such as the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF), which will take effect in August 2014.

 

However, the FCF only compels companies who want to hire foreigners to first advertise in a job bank so as to ostensibly consider Singaporeans first. But companies can still ignore all the Singaporean resumes and proceed to hire a foreigner.

 

The employer only needs to prove that he has already advertised the job vacancy in the job bank. The hiring of Singaporeans is not mandatory.

 

Nevertheless, Mr Iswaran said the government will continue to help all Singaporeans, including PMETs, be “job ready” through the education system.

 

Do you think Mr Iswaran’s reply has given Singaporeans the assurance that they will not be crowded out by foreign workers from ASEAN, under the new ASEAN Economic Community agreement?

 

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

25. Mr Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap: To ask the Minister for Transport (a) what is the breakdown of the motorcycle population in the Class 2, 2A and 2B categories for each year from 2011 to 2013; (b) what is the amount of COE revenue collected from the three categories respectively for each year from 2011 to 2013; and © whether the Ministry will consider abolishing COEs for motorcycles in the Class 2B category as these lower capacity motorcycles are usually used by lower-income persons for work purposes.

 

Hohoho, raid reserves ah!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i expect to see this

agent-smith-bullet-dodge-o.gif

 

 

 

A Myanmar maid working in Singapore by contrast earns S$450, almost 3.5 times the average salary of a civil servant in Myanmar.

 

No wonder my part time maid so happy when i gave her $50 ang bao for CNY.

Edited by Mockngbrd
Link to post
Share on other sites

damm scary this pap

http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/04/14/iswaran-asean-deal-wont-compromise-sg-job-opportunities/

 

 

Iswaran: ASEAN deal won’t compromise SG job opportunities
dmca_protected_sml_120n.pngPostDateIcon.png April 14th, 2014 | PostAuthorIcon.png Author: Editorial
Iswaran.png

Minister Iswaran

 

 

In Parliament today (14 Apr), Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong from the Workers’ Party asked an important question with regard to the status of the negotiations on the ASEAN Economic Community’s plan to allow free movement of professionals among ASEAN countries.

 

In particular, Mr Yee asked what safeguards the government has to ensure that Singapore professionals (i.e. PMETs) will not be crowded out.

 

Mr Yee’s question:

 

 

To ask the Minister for Trade and Industry:

(a) what is the status of negotiations on the ASEAN Economic Community goal to free up the movement of professionals; and

(b) what safeguards will be put in place to protect Singapore PMETs and to ensure national control over our immigration policies.

Even though the free movement of PMETs among ASEAN countries enables Singaporean PMETs to find jobs in other ASEAN countries without immigration hassles, the strong Singapore dollar will actually lead to ASEAN PMETs flooding Singapore, looking for jobs.

 

Here are the current exchange rates:

 

  • S$1 = 1 Dollar (Brunei)
  • S$1 = 3208 Riel (Cambodia)
  • S$1 = 9131 Rupiah (Indonesia)
  • S$1 = 6440 Kip (Laos)
  • S$1 = 2.6 Ringgit (Malaysia)
  • S$1 = 770 Kyat (Myanmar)
  • S$1 = 35.6 peso (Philippines)
  • S$1 = 25.8 Baht (Thailand)
  • S$1 = 16847 Dong (Vietnam)

 

In Myanmar, for example, it has been reported that civil servants earn an average of 100,000 kyat (S$130) a month and daily workers earn as little as 20,000 kyat (S$26) a month [Link].

 

A Myanmar maid working in Singapore by contrast earns S$450, almost 3.5 times the average salary of a civil servant in Myanmar.

 

S$2,200 – the minimum salary for a foreign PMET holding an S Pass in Singapore – works out to 1.7 million kyat a month or 17 times the average salary of a civil servant in Myanmar.

 

In other words, every month that a Myanmar PMET works in Singapore for S$2,200 a month, he is making the equivalent of almost 1.5 years’ pay for an average civil servant in Myanmar.

 

Working for 2 years in Singapore would be like working for 36 years in Myanmar for the PMET. Therefore, to Myanmar PMETs, Singapore is heaven. Who in ASEAN does not want to come to Singapore to work?

 

 

Iswaran’s reply

 

 

Replying to Mr Yee’s question, Second Minister for Trade and Industry S Iswaran said that under the ASEAN Agreement on the Movement of Natural Persons, Singapore is committed to allowing the entry of intra-corporate transferees at the level of managers, executives and specialists.

 

Entry for these intra-corporate transferees is limited to a 2-year period that may be extended for up to 3 additional years each time for a total term not exceeding 8 years.

 

Given Singapore’s low unemployment rate, Mr Iswaran said that allowing selected skilled labour from ASEAN to work here temporarily enables Singapore to fill skill gaps, without compromising the job opportunities of local PMETs.

 

He assured the House that measures are in place to foster a level playing field for Singaporean PMETs, such as the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF), which will take effect in August 2014.

 

However, the FCF only compels companies who want to hire foreigners to first advertise in a job bank so as to ostensibly consider Singaporeans first. But companies can still ignore all the Singaporean resumes and proceed to hire a foreigner.

 

The employer only needs to prove that he has already advertised the job vacancy in the job bank. The hiring of Singaporeans is not mandatory.

 

Nevertheless, Mr Iswaran said the government will continue to help all Singaporeans, including PMETs, be “job ready” through the education system.

 

Do you think Mr Iswaran’s reply has given Singaporeans the assurance that they will not be crowded out by foreign workers from ASEAN, under the new ASEAN Economic Community agreement?

 

 

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hohoho, raid reserves ah!

good what! I dont think the collected amount from motorbike coe is more than what out Ministers collected per annum!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

damm scary this pap

 

May explain why many dun want to convert.

 

Work 1 yr can be = work for decades in their homeland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he will tell you motorcycles also contribute to congestion though not in the league of motorcars, n all the grandmother grandfather stories.

 

I think MP should ask more "intelligent", demanding and challenging questions pertaining to motorbikes COE rather than just "whether the Ministry will consider abolishing COEs for motorcycles in the Class 2B category as these lower capacity motorcycles are usually used by lower-income persons for work purposes."

good what! I dont think the collected amount from motorbike coe is more than what out Ministers collected per annum!

 

Edited by Kangadrool
Link to post
Share on other sites

he will tell you motorcycles also contribute to congestion though not in the league of motorcars, n all the grandmother grandfather stories.

 

I think MP should ask more "intelligent", demanding and challenging questions pertaining to motorbikes COE rather than just "whether the Ministry will consider abolishing COEs for motorcycles in the Class 2B category as these lower capacity motorcycles are usually used by lower-income persons for work purposes."

 

ya hor...maybe can include 2a oso....if higher than 400 cc is considered luxury item!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent !!!

 

Good quality questions fielded by Worker's Party.

 

It's about time that our daily queries are asked in a Parliament.

 

Keep it up, Worker's Party. Responsible scrutiny of the govt [thumbsup]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

ya hor...maybe can include 2a oso....if higher than 400 cc is considered luxury item!

 

If what I was told is materializes......eventually be 6+, perhaps

 

- Class 2 (as it is)

- Class 2A (50% of above rounded up to nearest $10)

- Class 2B (NA)

 

At 6K+, evening out the above, the G will still collect about the same amount. No losses.

 

If it reaches 9K+ [sweatdrop] , then they surely win.

I thought WP's question will be something like,"when can I slap the driver?".

 

These WWE showmanship can only happen during GE when theres a margin allowed. If WP try above during Parliament, sure get hammered, pun intended.

 

Oppo Vs Incum in Sin is like Bike Vs Car. Head on sure loose big time.

he will tell you motorcycles also contribute to congestion though not in the league of motorcars, n all the grandmother grandfather stories.

 

I think MP should ask more "intelligent", demanding and challenging questions pertaining to motorbikes COE rather than just "whether the Ministry will consider abolishing COEs for motorcycles in the Class 2B category as these lower capacity motorcycles are usually used by lower-income persons for work purposes."

 

 

That's treading on thin ice. Oppo in Sin need must present things amicably, else they risk .....getting.... [sweatdrop] . The idea is not to let them "pin" u on something & get kicked out of Paliam, yet ensure that the voice of Singaporeans are heard.

damm scary this pap

 

 

Saw a new term coined in TRE a few days back. GE = Get Even.....aka Get Even 2016 .... [laugh]

i expect to see this

 

 

No wonder my part time maid so happy when i gave her $50 ang bao for CNY.

Don't say 50, we gave our (Indon) 10 also damn happy.... [lipsrsealed]

This is like switching to auto and fire away man!!!

 

Maybe that's why there are now many NMP(s) choosing not to renew their term. [:p]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 2B no need COE, Gilera VXR200 and KTM Duke 200 will be the kings of the road. [laugh]

 

 

If what I was told is materializes......eventually be 6+, perhaps

 

- Class 2 (as it is)

- Class 2A (50% of above rounded up to nearest $10)

- Class 2B (NA)

 

At 6K+, evening out the above, the G will still collect about the same amount. No losses.

 

If it reaches 9K+ [sweatdrop] , then they surely win.


 

These WWE showmanship can only happen during GE when theres a margin allowed. If WP try above during Parliament, sure get hammered, pun intended.

 

Oppo Vs Incum in Sin is like Bike Vs Car. Head on sure loose big time.


 

That's treading on thin ice. Oppo in Sin need must present things amicably, else they risk .....getting.... [sweatdrop] . The idea is not to let them "pin" u on something & get kicked out of Paliam, yet ensure that the voice of Singaporeans are heard.


 

Saw a new term coined in TRE a few days back. GE = Get Even.....aka Get Even 2016 .... [laugh]


Don't say 50, we gave our (Indon) 10 also damn happy.... [lipsrsealed]


 

Maybe that's why there are now many NMP(s) choosing not to renew their term. [:p]

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

If 2B no need COE, Gilera VXR200 and KTM Duke 200 will be the kings of the road. [laugh]

 

 

That was what I thought hehe.

 

But I forgot bout the Runner, was thinking bout the Duke 200. Oops, bias....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I don't understand ©. What privacy issues? As in you drive somewhere but don't want people to know you drive somewhere? Is there such privacy now?

*45. Mr Png Eng Huat: To ask the Minister for Transport with regard to the introduction of ERP2 in 2020 (a) what is the roadmap to roll out the new islandwide GPS-based road pricing system and its value-added services; (b) what is the estimated cost of ERP2; and © what are the safeguards to minimise privacy issues.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

I don't understand ©. What privacy issues? As in you drive somewhere but don't want people to know you drive somewhere? Is there such privacy now?

 

 

Could be concerns on abuse of data collected? Guess in general people don't quite feel comfortable with the idea that their movement is micro monitored. Like in the movie, Enemy of The State... ?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...