OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey results

[Sosaria]

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/despite-longer-hours/1204752.html

 

Survey found that singapore teachers work an average of 48 hours a week - 10 hours longer than the global average - of which 17 hours are used for teaching, and only 5 hours a week are spent on administrative duties (I suppose this includes CCA and meetings).

Is this even believable?? Or because this is just average number and the standard deviation is very large? I know some teachers complain 60 hr+ spent on work a week. And one mindless meeting is already 2 hr at least.

On the other hand, only lower secondary school teachers were surveyed - so how can this justify being generalized for the entire population of teachers nation-wide?

MOE of course puts a positive spin to it, and says our teachers work extra because they want to do the best for students (and not because of extra admin stuff dreamed up by them?)

What is interesting is that, up north: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/malaysian-teachers-spend-29pc-time-admin-says-study-005400214.html

"On average, Malaysian teachers spend 17 hours each week teaching, compared to the survey average of 19 hours.

In comparison, they spend six hours per week planning and preparing lessons, and seven hours per week marking and correcting work." That means only 4 hours on admin duties.

All sounds very comparable, actually, maybe due to similarities in education systems inherited from same british colonial history.

 

Edited June 26, 2014 by Sosaria

[Sosaria]

Teachers here no comment?

 

Or because the response will be unprintable??