Jump to content

$7,000 fine not excessive for 14 parking offences: Judge


Watwheels
 Share

Recommended Posts

(edited)

http://transport.asiaone.com/news/general/story/7000-fine-not-excessive-14-parking-offences-judge

 

Foo Jie Ying | The New Paper | Friday, Jun 26, 2015

A man who was found guilty of 14 parking offences is trying to appeal against his sentence of a $7,000 fine.

Gabriel Ravi Janageran pleaded guilty to 14 offences under the Parking Places Act between 2011 and 2014.

This includes 11 counts of parking in a place other than a parking lot, one count of parking in a season parking place, one count of obstructive parking and one count of parking with expired coupons.

Earlier this month, he was fined $7,000.

In mitigation, he said he has four children and is the sole breadwinner, working two jobs to sustain the family. He pleaded for leniency and a light fine.

But District Judge Sarah Tan Yin Tze said in her judgment that the accused's financial circumstances did not have any "significant bearing as a mitigating factor".

AT COURT'S DISCRETION

"It is settled law that financial difficulties is a legitimate mitigating factor only in very exceptional or extreme circumstances and the weight attributed to it was at the court's discretion," she said.

She pointed out that Gabriel had been granted four adjournments - three times in the Night Court, which deals with summonses and notices issued by government departments as well as road traffic offences, and once in the State Court, after the case was transferred from the Night Court.

"...The accused had been granted numerous adjournments, at his request or otherwise... to allow him, inter alia, the opportunity to raise funds for the court fines," she said.

Adding that each conviction for a first-time offence would warrant a fine of between $600 and $800 and a default sentence of two to four days, Judge Tan said Gabriel's sentence is "not unreasonable or excessive".

"Taking a step back for a holistic perspective, (a) total fine of S$7,000.00 for the 14 charges is also not crushing.

 

"I was of the view that a default term of one day's imprisonment per charge is appropriate, amounting to an aggregate default term of 14 days' imprisonment," she said.

The accused is now out on bail pending appeal.

 

 

 

What do you make of it? Really no time or really boh chap.

So miserable to have the car. Can't pay for the fines, how to pay to keep the car running?

 

Edited by Watwheels
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

http://transport.asiaone.com/news/general/story/7000-fine-not-excessive-14-parking-offences-judge

 

Foo Jie Ying | The New Paper | Friday, Jun 26, 2015

A man who was found guilty of 14 parking offences is trying to appeal against his sentence of a $7,000 fine.

Gabriel Ravi Janageran pleaded guilty to 14 offences under the Parking Places Act between 2011 and 2014.

This includes 11 counts of parking in a place other than a parking lot, one count of parking in a season parking place, one count of obstructive parking and one count of parking with expired coupons.

Earlier this month, he was fined $7,000.

In mitigation, he said he has four children and is the sole breadwinner, working two jobs to sustain the family. He pleaded for leniency and a light fine.

But District Judge Sarah Tan Yin Tze said in her judgment that the accused's financial circumstances did not have any "significant bearing as a mitigating factor".

AT COURT'S DISCRETION

"It is settled law that financial difficulties is a legitimate mitigating factor only in very exceptional or extreme circumstances and the weight attributed to it was at the court's discretion," she said.

She pointed out that Gabriel had been granted four adjournments - three times in the Night Court, which deals with summonses and notices issued by government departments as well as road traffic offences, and once in the State Court, after the case was transferred from the Night Court.

"...The accused had been granted numerous adjournments, at his request or otherwise... to allow him, inter alia, the opportunity to raise funds for the court fines," she said.

Adding that each conviction for a first-time offence would warrant a fine of between $600 and $800 and a default sentence of two to four days, Judge Tan said Gabriel's sentence is "not unreasonable or excessive".

"Taking a step back for a holistic perspective, (a) total fine of S$7,000.00 for the 14 charges is also not crushing.

 

"I was of the view that a default term of one day's imprisonment per charge is appropriate, amounting to an aggregate default term of 14 days' imprisonment," she said.

The accused is now out on bail pending appeal.

 

 

 

What do you make of it? Really no time or really boh chap.

So miserable to have the car. Can't pay for the fines, how to pay to keep the car running?

 

 

sounds more like his selfish parking behavior caught up with him.

 

normally if you are remorseful, the judges here can be quite lenient.

 

the drunk driver who hit me got a $3000 fine le. (he readily admitted to the judge he was DD and asked for second chance)

 

maybe this fella is a recalcitrant offender? seems he obstructed others as well ...

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

sounds more like his selfish parking behavior caught up with him.

 

normally if you are remorseful, the judges here can be quite lenient.

 

the drunk driver who hit me got a $3000 fine le. (he readily admitted to the judge he was DD and asked for second chance)

 

maybe this fella is a recalcitrant offender? seems he obstructed others as well ...

 

 

I think he has family & financial problem and he doesn't want to address them. What's the word?.....Procrastinate?

 

That's why I dun go out when it's late at night.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

 

 

I think he has family & financial problem and he doesn't want to address them. What's the word?.....Procrastinate?

 

That's why I dun go out when it's late at night.

 

perhaps. but with that many offences, definitely got a bigger issue like u said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

perhaps. but with that many offences, definitely got a bigger issue like u said.

 

I think the worst ppl to owe money to is the authorities. You can owe bank, ah loong & etc money. But if you owe the authorities money be prepared to go court and go jail.

  • Praise 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

He could be just a driver working for a Company and everytime the owner (his boss) gets the ticket he puts in his worker name of course, as many companies allow drivers to take back vehicles - the report is not very clear in some aspects... but then again 14 summons is just too big a number!- any way all are Parking Summons which many Singaporeans love to play around :a-panic: ; So far he got non for speeding/dangerous driving or beating red lights/drunkardness......

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

$7000 for 14 charges that's average $500/charge. For illegal parking I dun think it's that high unless the offender dun bother to pay the fine on time, subsequently he will be summon to court and etc. It will just roll into a bigger fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

Aiyah... definitely bo chup la. Every with legal parking, we still see drivers parking their vehicle in such selfish way that it denies others or inconvenient others.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

$7000 for 14 charges that's average $500/charge. For illegal parking I dun think it's that high unless the offender dun bother to pay the fine on time, subsequently he will be summon to court and etc. It will just roll into a bigger fine.

 

He probably ignored the offer to compound and took his chance at Court. Compound for illegal parking seldom exceed $150 per ticket iirc. As the sole bread winner with 4 kids, I expect him to exercise more common sense. I think the Judge is quiet lenient to offer him 1 day jail for each charge on default. 14 days for $7,000 looks to be a better deal for him.

  • Praise 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged
(edited)

this person also have others summon (which range S$50 to S$150) which is not stated in the below list

Should also send this idiot to Changi Chalet

===========================

 

 

Select
Notice No.
Vehicle No.
Amount Fine
Date of Offence
H7235187S
FBC9665H
$25.00
29 May 2015
H6942883Y
FBC9665H
$40.00
20 Jan 2015
H6228350R
FBC9665H
$25.00
06 Jun 2014
H6272016Y
FBC9665H
$25.00
23 May 2014
H6367608V
FBC9665H
$25.00
21 May 2014
H6325856P
FBC9665H
$25.00
25 Apr 2014
H6341348Q
FBC9665H
$25.00
19 Apr 2014
H6227311U
FBC9665H
$25.00
14 Apr 2014
H6284770K
FBC9665H
$25.00
03 Apr 2014
H6246783P
FBC9665H
$25.00
02 Apr 2014
H5710652Y
FBC9665H
$8.00
23 Oct 2013
H5492600P
FBC9665H
$8.00
06 Sep 2013
H5433485V
FBC9665H
$8.00
14 Aug 2013
H5346644K
FBC9665H
$8.00
22 Jul 2013
H4913113R
FBC9665H
$8.00
03 Apr 2013
H4587338X
FBC9665H
$8.00
02 Jan 2013
H4632243M
FBC9665H
$8.00
12 Dec 2012
H4492399Q
FBC9665H
$8.00
07 Nov 2012
H4510370R
FBC9665H
$8.00
02 Nov 2012
H4499268R
FBC9665H
$8.00
31 Oct 2012
H4405264R
FBC9665H
$8.00
13 Oct 2012
H4316359K
FBC9665H
$8.00
02 Oct 2012
H4135591V
FBC9665H
$8.00
29 Sep 2012
H4326590T
FBC9665H
$8.00
27 Sep 2012
Edited by Mcf777
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

He probably ignored the offer to compound and took his chance at Court. Compound for illegal parking seldom exceed $150 per ticket iirc. As the sole bread winner with 4 kids, I expect him to exercise more common sense. I think the Judge is quiet lenient to offer him 1 day jail for each charge on default. 14 days for $7,000 looks to be a better deal for him.

 

I dunno what's going on in his mind. The last sentence make him look suspiciously weird. "The accused is now out on bail pending appeal."

 

Oh, now he has money to post bail but not pay the $7K fine. Somemore can appeal, means got hire a lawyer. Whoa, suddenly become rich siah. Or did I miss something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

 

I dunno what's going on in his mind. The last sentence make him look suspiciously weird. "The accused is now out on bail pending appeal."

 

Oh, now he has money to post bail but not pay the $7K fine. Somemore can appeal, means got hire a lawyer. Whoa, suddenly become rich siah. Or did I miss something?

 

No need cash to bail. Just need to show 'Worth'. Less than $15k, items of value can be used. That's why everyone needs to have friends and relatives. :XD:

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

this person also have others summon (which range S$50 to S$150) which is not stated in the below list

Should also send this idiot to Changi Chalet

===========================

 

 

Select
Notice No.
Vehicle No.
Amount Fine
Date of Offence
H7235187S
FBC9665H
$25.00
29 May 2015
H6942883Y
FBC9665H
$40.00
20 Jan 2015
H6228350R
FBC9665H
$25.00
06 Jun 2014
H6272016Y
FBC9665H
$25.00
23 May 2014
H6367608V
FBC9665H
$25.00
21 May 2014
H6325856P
FBC9665H
$25.00
25 Apr 2014
H6341348Q
FBC9665H
$25.00
19 Apr 2014
H6227311U
FBC9665H
$25.00
14 Apr 2014
H6284770K
FBC9665H
$25.00
03 Apr 2014
H6246783P
FBC9665H
$25.00
02 Apr 2014
H5710652Y
FBC9665H
$8.00
23 Oct 2013
H5492600P
FBC9665H
$8.00
06 Sep 2013
H5433485V
FBC9665H
$8.00
14 Aug 2013
H5346644K
FBC9665H
$8.00
22 Jul 2013
H4913113R
FBC9665H
$8.00
03 Apr 2013
H4587338X
FBC9665H
$8.00
02 Jan 2013
H4632243M
FBC9665H
$8.00
12 Dec 2012
H4492399Q
FBC9665H
$8.00
07 Nov 2012
H4510370R
FBC9665H
$8.00
02 Nov 2012
H4499268R
FBC9665H
$8.00
31 Oct 2012
H4405264R
FBC9665H
$8.00
13 Oct 2012
H4316359K
FBC9665H
$8.00
02 Oct 2012
H4135591V
FBC9665H
$8.00
29 Sep 2012
H4326590T
FBC9665H
$8.00
27 Sep 2012

 

Wow, how you got all these information? Fantastic.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...