Jump to content

Prostitution Ads Online "Flourishing" Forum


Picnic06-Biante15
 Share

Recommended Posts

(edited)

Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Lau ....... Sammyboy Forum kena mentioned ... :a-aggressive::a-aggressive:

 

 

 

CNA: Prostitution ads online: Judge voices concern over 'flourishing' forums

 

SINGAPORE: A District Judge in the State Courts raised concerns over the existence of online forum Sammyboy after hearing a case on Friday (Jul 10) related to sex workers advertising their services on the website.

 

District Judge Mathew Joseph said he was "concerned" with the site, after noting "a lot of activities" were present on the site involving "young, vulnerable people".

 

"The site seems to be flourishing," he added.

 

He said this in sentencing 41-year-old Foo Suan Wee to ten weeks' imprisonment for living off the earnings of prostitutes. Foo had pleaded guilty to four charges, with three others taken into consideration.

 

Judge Joseph asked the prosecution to check with the authorities to see if any actions were being taken against the Sammyboy site.

 

The prosecutor said that he would pass on the feedback to enforcement agencies.

 

The site was cited in a High Court judgement on Dec 22, 2014, where a freelance photographer helped to advertise sex workers on the website and charged them a fee for his photographic and advertising services.

 

A check on the Sammyboy website revealed slogans such as "your virtual sex hub" and "commercial sex info at your fingertips".

 

Threads pertaining to sex worker activities in areas, such as Geylang, Keong Saik and Desker, were present.

 

Sex work is legal in Singapore, but public solicitation for sex and living off the earnings of sex workers are illegal.

 

S$6,000 MONTHLY PROFIT FOR HELPING WITH PROSTITUTES' ONLINE ADS

 

Investigations revealed that sometime in September 2013, Foo had become a regular customer of a female Chinese prostitute before she asked him if he could help advertise her services on the Internet.

 

Foo then posted an advertisement on behalf of the girl on Sammyboy.

 

Subsequently, the prostitute referred others to Foo to advertise their sexual services. Foo began charging S$200 per month from each prostitute's earnings to advertise on different websites.

 

Foo would also trawl other websites for prostitutes and contact them via messaging app WeChat to ask if they wanted his help to advertise their sexual services. He would meet them to collect payment in cash before publishing photographs and information on such websites.

 

To keep the advertisements up on the websites, the prostitutes had to pay a monthly fee of between S$200 and S$300 to the accused.

 

When he was arrested on Dec 19, 2014, the authorities found that Foo had helped advertise the sexual services of about 30 to 40 female prostitutes per month, making a monthly profit of about S$6,000.

 

Prosecution submitted that the case was aggravated due to the protracted period of advertising, the low-cost and high-multiplier nature of using the Internet, and the high monthly profits that Foo was getting from the offence.

 

Foo could have received a maximum five years' jail and a S$10,000 fine for his offence.

 

 

- CNA/ek

 

 

Link: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/prostitution-ads-online/1974466.html?cx_tag=trendingsg#cxrecs_s

 

 

 

 

Heng Ah, MCF got good MODs to keep it clean ......... :serious-business:

Edited by Picnic06
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Lau ....... Sammyboy Forum kena mentioned ... :a-aggressive::a-aggressive:

 

 

 

CNA: Prostitution ads online: Judge voices concern over 'flourishing' forums

 

SINGAPORE: A District Judge in the State Courts raised concerns over the existence of online forum Sammyboy after hearing a case on Friday (Jul 10) related to sex workers advertising their services on the website.

 

District Judge Mathew Joseph said he was "concerned" with the site, after noting "a lot of activities" were present on the site involving "young, vulnerable people".

 

"The site seems to be flourishing," he added.

 

He said this in sentencing 41-year-old Foo Suan Wee to ten weeks' imprisonment for living off the earnings of prostitutes. Foo had pleaded guilty to four charges, with three others taken into consideration.

 

Judge Joseph asked the prosecution to check with the authorities to see if any actions were being taken against the Sammyboy site.

 

The prosecutor said that he would pass on the feedback to enforcement agencies.

 

The site was cited in a High Court judgement on Dec 22, 2014, where a freelance photographer helped to advertise sex workers on the website and charged them a fee for his photographic and advertising services.

 

A check on the Sammyboy website revealed slogans such as "your virtual sex hub" and "commercial sex info at your fingertips".

 

Threads pertaining to sex worker activities in areas, such as Geylang, Keong Saik and Desker, were present.

 

Sex work is legal in Singapore, but public solicitation for sex and living off the earnings of sex workers are illegal.

 

S$6,000 MONTHLY PROFIT FOR HELPING WITH PROSTITUTES' ONLINE ADS

 

Investigations revealed that sometime in September 2013, Foo had become a regular customer of a female Chinese prostitute before she asked him if he could help advertise her services on the Internet.

 

Foo then posted an advertisement on behalf of the girl on Sammyboy.

 

Subsequently, the prostitute referred others to Foo to advertise their sexual services. Foo began charging S$200 per month from each prostitute's earnings to advertise on different websites.

 

Foo would also trawl other websites for prostitutes and contact them via messaging app WeChat to ask if they wanted his help to advertise their sexual services. He would meet them to collect payment in cash before publishing photographs and information on such websites.

 

To keep the advertisements up on the websites, the prostitutes had to pay a monthly fee of between S$200 and S$300 to the accused.

 

When he was arrested on Dec 19, 2014, the authorities found that Foo had helped advertise the sexual services of about 30 to 40 female prostitutes per month, making a monthly profit of about S$6,000.

 

Prosecution submitted that the case was aggravated due to the protracted period of advertising, the low-cost and high-multiplier nature of using the Internet, and the high monthly profits that Foo was getting from the offence.

 

Foo could have received a maximum five years' jail and a S$10,000 fine for his offence.

 

 

- CNA/ek

 

 

Link: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/prostitution-ads-online/1974466.html?cx_tag=trendingsg#cxrecs_s

 

 

 

 

Heng Ah, MCF got good MODs to keep it clean ......... :serious-business:

 

sell backside - legal

sell handphone - legal

 

seller of handphone engages advertising company - legal

seller of backside engages "free-lance advertising company" - tio pork [laugh]

i'm very concerned over sammyboy forum ... LOL

 

I am very worried over the bad influences that it has over our society

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

One is must declare and can declare earnings easily.

 

The other one must declare earnings, but how to declare earnings truthfully? Want to declare also difficult, so paisay, no receipts...... [laugh]

 

So gahment say illegal lor.

 

 

sell backside - legal

sell handphone - legal

 

seller of handphone engages advertising company - legal

seller of backside engages "free-lance advertising company" - tio pork [laugh]


 

I am very worried over the bad influences that it has over our society

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One is must declare and can declare earnings easily.

 

The other one must declare earnings, but how to declare earnings truthfully? Want to declare also difficult, so paisay, no receipts...... [laugh]

 

So gahment say illegal lor.

 

 

 

hey guys! check this out [laugh]

 

Foo then posted an advertisement on behalf of the girl on Sammyboy.

 

Subsequently, the prostitute referred others to Foo to advertise their sexual services. Foo began charging S$200 per month from each prostitute's earnings to advertise on different websites.

 

sounds like FR [sly][smash]:grin:

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

so, ah foo is charged under pimping or advertising? [sly]

 

foo should advertise ... 1-to-1 tuition available ... lol

 

To keep the advertisements up on the websites, the prostitutes had to pay a monthly fee of between S$200 and S$300 to the accused.
Edited by Wt_know
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

why dun gahmen monopolize the sex trade? [idea][sly]

 

since they have already monopolize other vices (吃喝嫖赌)

 

set up Singaporepools & casinos -> outlaw other means of gambling

 

for cigarettes -> non duty-paid ones are illegal

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

why dun gahmen monopolize the sex trade? [idea][sly]

 

since they have already monopolize other vices (吃喝嫖赌)

 

set up Singaporepools & casinos -> outlaw other means of gambling

 

for cigarettes -> non duty-paid ones are illegal

 

There are legal ones..

Maybe the demand for online ones are more than the legal ones

Link to post
Share on other sites

why dun gahmen monopolize the sex trade? [idea][sly]

 

since they have already monopolize other vices (吃喝嫖赌)

 

set up Singaporepools & casinos -> outlaw other means of gambling

 

for cigarettes -> non duty-paid ones are illegal

 

Gahmen already monopolize the flesh trade since eons ago.. its all there in GL....

 

To the current Gov, anyting they can get $$$ out of is legal... anyting they cannot lay their hands on the $$$ = illegal...

 

Last time got many peeple go cruise gamble on the international waters over the weekend, so gov build 2 casinos in the end to rake in these gambler's $$$.. Last time Ah Gong say no casino in SG rite? Many Many social ills right? Then fast forward to now, then how now?? Lol....

 

To them, whatever they say right is right, damn the consequences to the peasants... only $$$ matters to them....

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

just to be safe .... better delete all your private messages in sammyboy ... LOL

 

Wonder this Foo guy under what nick in Sammyboy forum ..... :wut:

 

Edited by Wt_know
Link to post
Share on other sites

u concerned the authorities will shut it down huh

 

i'm very concerned over sammyboy forum ... LOL

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...