Ssanyong Tivoli

[Clement]

Has anyone seen the Ssanyong Tivoli, reviewed in Straits Times here:

http://www.stcars.sg/guides-articles/ssangyongs-small-suv-surprise-146212

 

Looks good. Anyone test drove it yet? Does it feel under-powered?

It will be on my shortlist as I am looking out for a Japanese / Korean SUV.

 

 

 

 

[GoodCar]

Got photo boh? The diesel version look tempting. 350nm for a 1.6l

[Clement]

Here are some photos of the vehicle.

[Chuapcd]

Is this car bigger than Vezel?

[Clement]

I am also looking at the Honda Vezel / HRV:

 

 

Dimensions (L x W x H)

 

(4295 x 1770 x 1605) mm

 

Ssangyong Tivoli :

 

Dimensions (L x W x H)

 

(4195 x 1795 x 1590) mm

 

 

They are almost the same size, Tivoli is slightly shorter in length.

Height is taller and width is narrower.

 

 

[Csiewtn]

Price at $125K seems a little too high as compared to Vezel

[Thaiyotakamli]

Before looking at the price and look, look at the brand

[Wt_know]

that design, equipment/accessories and brand ... cannot fight nissan QQ (somemore facelift coming)

 

Before looking at the price and look, look at the brand

 

Edited August 27, 2015 by Wt_know

[Sicko]

I test drove the car about a month ago. Car was pretty stable and turning radius was good. (That was in comparison with my current 9 years old ride) After test driving forester and CX 5, you will feel the difference immediately.

 

Similar price range but performance is miles apart. Only selling point is the high trade in value, 5 years warranty, 3 or 5 years free servicing and in house financial package -90% loan available.

 

No offence but the above is my 2cents worth of sharing.

[Pss2]

I find this car nicer than Vezel in terms of styling.

[Multi]

I find this car nicer than Vezel in terms of styling.

 

Agree but price is not nice at $125,888

[Weesern]

Anyone bought this car? 

[teomingern]

Very few on the road... find the styling odd... as with all Ssangyong cars over the years...

[Aukang]

I test drove the car about a month ago. Car was pretty stable and turning radius was good. (That was in comparison with my current 9 years old ride) After test driving forester and CX 5, you will feel the difference immediately.

 

Similar price range but performance is miles apart. Only selling point is the high trade in value, 5 years warranty, 3 or 5 years free servicing and in house financial package -90% loan available.

 

 

 

sorry...i am not good at interpretating the sentence...whether you meant

 

"Car was pretty stable and turning radius was good. (That was in comparison with my current 9 years old ride) but After test driving forester and CX 5, you will feel the difference immediately." ie...that it is not so good after all... or

 

Car was pretty stable and turning radius was good. (That was in comparison with my current 9 years old ride) even After test driving forester and CX 5, you will feel the difference immediately. ie...that it is evem better than forester and CX5?

[teomingern]

sorry...i am not good at interpretating the sentence...whether you meant

 

"Car was pretty stable and turning radius was good. (That was in comparison with my current 9 years old ride) but After test driving forester and CX 5, you will feel the difference immediately." ie...that it is not so good after all... or

 

Car was pretty stable and turning radius was good. (That was in comparison with my current 9 years old ride) even After test driving forester and CX 5, you will feel the difference immediately. ie...that it is evem better than forester and CX5?

 

Hahahaha... I took it to mean that the CX-5 and Forester are better lar...

[Fuelsaver]

Looked like bigger Suzuki swift to me. Branding n pricing should b main issues for the non popularity; only saw 2-3 otr since launch.

[Watwheels]

I always thought it's a mini from the back. Aiya, maybe I'm getting older, can't see well at night. LoL...

[ChristopherChia]

I really like the quirky design, however, the price is very high for a relatively unknown Korean car. 

Edited May 8, 2016 by ChristopherChia