Jump to content

The Audi Q5 has received ABT treatment

The Audi Q5 has received ABT treatment

Sign in to follow this  
Burnpavement

1,720 views

How do you feel when you see VW rims on Skoda?  

22 members have voted

  1. 1.

    • Indifferent ...
      9
    • Owner of the Skoda couldn't find Skoda rims
      5
    • Owner tries to disguise the Skoda as a VW
      8

monthly_12_2012/blogentry-29970-1355719439.jpg

[extract]

blogentry-29970-1355719821_thumb.jpg

This wide and wonderful Q5 has received the ABT treatment, and we can't help but yelp about it! Sometimes you don't realise what you want until you've been given a taste of it. I hate that. Until today, I was perfectly fine with the way a stock Audi Q5 looks and performs. I

Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Construction on Jurong Region Line to start next year

    Construction works for five stations on the new Jurong Region Line (JRL) are expected to start next year and slated for completion in 2026. The five stations are Choa Chu Kang, Choa Chu Kang West, Tengah, Hong Kah and Corporation, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said yesterday. The authority has awarded two contracts worth $739.5 million to construct the five MRT stations. The stations will form part of JRL, Singapore's seventh MRT line, which is set to open in three stages from 2026. Comprising 24 stations, the line was announced last year to improve connectivity in the Jurong area, with the aim of boosting the area's transformation into a second Central Business District.

    SGCM_editorial

    SGCM_editorial

    Ford revealed upcoming Polo GTI rival

    Ford has unveiled the Fiesta ST concept at the Frankfurt Motor Show. Built to preview an upcoming production model, the concept has an aerodynamic body kit, lowered sports suspension, dual exhaust system and 17-inch alloy wheels. On the inside, the cabin features Recaro sport seats and high contrast trim.   The new Ford Fiesta ST Concept is powered by the familiar 1.6L EcoBoost 4 cylinder engine, which uses turbocharging and direct injection technologies to churn out 180PS and 240Nm of torque. These figures are similar to the Volvo S60 T4. The Polo GTI

    SYF77

    SYF77

    Upcoming Mercedes-AMG A45 will output more than 400bhp

    Currently, Audi's RS3 is the the most powerful hot hatch money can buy. But according to Mercedes-AMG boss, the next A45 will have even more.   In an interview with Car Advice, Tobias Moers confirmed that the new A45 will have to churn out at least 400bhp from its all-new 2.0-litre engine.   “We don’t want to give a tip or an advantage to our competitors, but we do need to be over 300kW (402bhp) – that’s the new standard.”   He also hinted that having an electric turbine is something they would consider. The ultra hot hatch is unlikely to go on sale before 2019.

    Faiming_low

    Faiming_low

    New bus model raises hopes for better service

    THERE was a public uproar last year when former Public Transport Council chairman Gerard Ee said in an interview with The Straits Times that if commuters wanted better service, they should just pay for it.   But Mr Ee was right, even if what he really meant was "somebody had to pay for it".   Two weeks ago, Anglo-Austra-lian transport group Tower Transit emerged the winner in Singapore's first bus contracting tender.   Its bid of $556 million to run 26 services out of a depot in Jurong West for a five-year period starts from the second quarter of next year. It will begin with 380 buses (up from 290 plying the area today), and ramp up to 500 by the time its contract ends.   From back-of-envelope calculations based on an average annual fleet of 440 buses, Tower's bid works out to $252,727 per bus per year - assuming $556 million is split equally over the five years.   That compares with around $154,500 per bus per year under the current regime, based on the combined bus revenue of SBS Transit (financial year 2013) and SMRT (FY2014) divided by their combined fleet.   The estimated cost of the tax-funded Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP) is around $185,000 per bus per year, after factoring in the resale value of the first 550 buses after the 10-year programme runs out.   Of course, that is not a precise apple-to-apple comparison because, in bus contracting, the Government buys and owns all operating assets and infrastructure. An operator, such as Tower, bids to operate a package of services in a competitive tender.   The successful operator is then paid the sum it bid for, while the Government collects and keeps fare revenue.   Even so, using Tower's operating fee of $556 million as a proxy to the fare revenue of the two incumbents gives us a rough gauge of what it takes to create a sustainable bus operating model.   In both cases, an operator makes money by controlling its operating expenses, which include paying the Government to lease its fleet of buses. In the current regime, neither SBS Transit nor SMRT has been able to cover bus operating expenses with fare revenue alone.   In principle, the new contracting model allows an operator to focus on meeting service standards without having to worry about capital expenditures and fare revenue.   Managing all three objectives, it seems, has been a juggling act made impossible by the fact that fares are controlled by the Public Transport Council.   Clearly, if fares remain unchanged, the Government will end up subsidising bus operations in a big way. That, however, has been the premise of bus contracting.   London, which started bus contracting more than 30 years ago (when the late prime minister Margaret Thatcher began privatising nationalised institutions), has seen its bus subsidies climbing year on year.   According to a 2013 government report, bus subsidies have risen from £24 million or 2p per passenger trip in 2001 to £393 million (about S$814 million) or 17p per passenger trip in 2012.   But supporters of the system point out that service standards have risen, too. And that many commuters travel for free. These include those over 60 years, the disabled, and children up to 15. Those between 16 and 18 pay concessionary rates. That is what Singapore is trying to achieve.   In the bus contracting model, at least half of all buses will arrive within 10 minutes, up from 30 per cent today. And intervals between buses will not exceed 15 minutes on any route, down from 30 minutes now.   While that may not sound like much, the standards are a feat that requires a disciplined and motivated staff to pull off. At the same time, an operator has to be efficient, as that affects how much profit it makes at the end of the day.   But to start off, an operator like Tower will have to offer competitive wages to build up its pool of drivers. This is not just because drivers are always in such short supply, but SBS Transit and SMRT - which will lose a number of routes to Tower from next year - are also likely to retain as many of the good ones as possible, so that they can be redeployed to other routes.   So, this competition for drivers will be positive for the profession - just like the liberalisation of the taxi industry some 10 years ago has proven to be beneficial to cabbies.   From a policy perspective, the contracting model is a more transparent and elegant way of doling out subsidies than the multi-billion-dollar BSEP, which is often misconstrued as financial assistance for bus companies.   But will bus contracting be better for commuters, and will it be worth the substantially higher cost it entails?   Well, that really depends on whether the new service standards will be met. If commuters need not wait more than 15 minutes at a bus stop, it will be money well spent (even if frequencies of 10 minutes and less are common in London). Because today, bus intervals here are often long or erratic.   And if service frequency increases, the level of crowdedness will naturally decrease. Hence, bus travel will also become more comfortable with the new operating model, if all goes according to plan.   To make this happen, the regulator has to be watchful. Otherwise, we may end up with an operating model that merely enriches transport companies.   Right now, the only missing piece in this grand ambition is a bus timetable. Several cities publish bus timetables, which allow commuters to plan their day with precision. They provide more certainty than online or smartphone apps, which, even if they are accessible to everybody, merely alert commuters to when the next bus will arrive.   As it stands, government subsidies for buses are set to rise with the contracting model. While future contracts may be less costly as competition hots up, it is clear buses will eventually get nearly as much state support as trains have been getting.   And, in all likelihood, fares will rise too, to reflect the improved service.   As Mr Ee put it, there is no free lunch.   -- ST ILLUSTRATION : MIEL   by Christopher Tan  

    ST_Opinion

    ST_Opinion

×