Jump to content

The aftermath of COE changes

The aftermath of COE changes

Sign in to follow this  
Regan_ong

8,908 views

blog-0188660001390810546.jpg

blogentry-133712-0-61854400-1390810474_thumb.jpgWeeks ago, the Government announced changes to the age-old COE system, in a bid to level the playing ground in the industry as well as to ensure a better division of COE allocation between premium and mass market cars.

 

Under the new implementation, banding for Category A will be tighten to cars with less than 130bhp only, on top of a 1.6-litre engine capacity. This means cars that were previously in Cat A but with more than 130bhp will be re-categorised into Cat B.

 

The revised banding will take effect from February next year, and will without doubt affect the local car industry. With the influx of Cat A cars that will be shifted into Cat B, the latter’s COE premium is expected to soar due to higher demand.

 

Assuming that premiums for Cat A take on a softer stance after the change, buyers may be attracted to model variants with lower power, and will turn to aftermarket kits to tune up the performance of their cars afterwards, as this route is more economically viable.

 

Models such as those from German marques Audi and Volkswagen have become the local's tuning favourites. The increasing availability of basic and fuss-free tuning options, such as ECU re-flash and chip tuning, can easily bring cars at the brim of Cat A banding, such as the base Volkswagen Golf (122bhp) and Audi A3 Sportback 1.4 (122bhp), to Cat B standards of over 130bhp.

 

This will likely spark new life into the aftermarket industry. But it will also make the situation unfavourable and unjust for Cat B car buyers.

 

As such, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) may seize the opportunity to further clamp down on illegal modifications, possibly conducting more random checks and increasing the number of enforcement officers on patrol.

 

Vehicle inspections would probably be more stringent as well, and in order to determine if the engine has been tuned, dyno tests could be conducted during inspections.

Sign in to follow this  


11 Comments


Recommended Comments

I don't see how reflashing the ECU could possibly be unfair. It's a matter of whether people know how to make use of the system to their advantage. If you don't make use of it to your advantage, someone else will. Be smart don't be a retard!

Share this comment


Link to comment

There's no doubt that the authorities will be aware of the entry level TCed cars that can be modified to over 130hp. Question is how stringent will they be? And how discreet will car owners be? There's always black sheeps amongst us.

When it comes to inspection, new cars will only be inspected after the first 3 years and dan subsequently bi-annually. Car owners can simply "re-flash" ECU to stock as and when before inspection or simply remove the "peggy back" ECU and after inspection revert back. IMO cat & mouse game. Look at the OPC scheme you will know what I mean. No system is perfect & w/o loopholes. But we will still get to see ppl get caught and fined.

Sometimes I think ppl just want to "show off" they do not know how to be discreet. Dan there will be "STOMPERS" posting videos of these speeding cars suspected of modifications.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hmm... Did the LTA state that under the new COE rules, upgrading the horsepower of vehicle will become illegal?

 

I do know that changing to a larger capacity engine is considered both illegal modification and tax fraud (road tax).

Share this comment


Link to comment

dyno during inspection?

means we have to pay more for inspection? Is this even a solution to a problem in the first place?

 

And who is paying for the owners wear and tear after eact dyno?

 

if gov policies makers is stupid enough to come out with such policies, and keep implementing new regulations just to cover their stupidity, without first working towards the root cause, then this country will be going downwards very soon.

Share this comment


Link to comment

How is this going to do *anything* to address congestion on the roads?

 

If anything, it will tend to lower the average bhp of the car on the road, leading to slower traffic on average and likely greater congestion.

 

What they *should* be doing is to make the driving tests more stringent (increase the skill level at high speed required to pass the test), and revise the speed limit in most places upward. Of course, road design changes are also required (it's idiotic to have two major expressways connected by a couple of narrow winding lanes, isn't it?).

Share this comment


Link to comment

How is this going to do *anything* to address congestion on the roads?

 

If anything, it will tend to lower the average bhp of the car on the road, leading to slower traffic on average and likely greater congestion.

 

What they *should* be doing is to make the driving tests more stringent (increase the skill level at high speed required to pass the test), and revise the speed limit in most places upward. Of course, road design changes are also required (it's idiotic to have two major expressways connected by a couple of narrow winding lanes, isn't it?).

 

This is simply a populist policy.

Notice how the govt keeps coming up with policies who's sole objective is to please the anti-PAP crowd?

 

Once this policy kicks in, CAT A price will drop. And since most anti-PAP people belong to the CAT A car buying crowd, they be happier, and hopefully become less anti-PAP.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I don't see how reflashing the ECU could possibly be unfair. It's a matter of whether people know how to make use of the system to their advantage. If you don't make use of it to your advantage, someone else will. Be smart don't be a retard!

I totally agree!

Share this comment


Link to comment

There's no doubt that the authorities will be aware of the entry level TCed cars that can be modified to over 130hp. Question is how stringent will they be? And how discreet will car owners be? There's always black sheeps amongst us.

When it comes to inspection, new cars will only be inspected after the first 3 years and dan subsequently bi-annually. Car owners can simply "re-flash" ECU to stock as and when before inspection or simply remove the "peggy back" ECU and after inspection revert back. IMO cat & mouse game. Look at the OPC scheme you will know what I mean. No system is perfect & w/o loopholes. But we will still get to see ppl get caught and fined.

Sometimes I think ppl just want to "show off" they do not know how to be discreet. Dan there will be "STOMPERS" posting videos of these speeding cars suspected of modifications.

I think govt should add more on the road random check, once catch the offender, throw them in jail, revoke license,

but it's quite difficult for implementation, it's unfair for those law-abiding motorists, nobody will buy these kind of boundary cars

Share this comment


Link to comment

How is this going to do *anything* to address congestion on the roads?

 

If anything, it will tend to lower the average bhp of the car on the road, leading to slower traffic on average and likely greater congestion.

 

What they *should* be doing is to make the driving tests more stringent (increase the skill level at high speed required to pass the test), and revise the speed limit in most places upward. Of course, road design changes are also required (it's idiotic to have two major expressways connected by a couple of narrow winding lanes, isn't it?).

actually the most "Slow" was caused by commerical and heavy vehicles, govt should ban commerical and heavy vehicles enter some particular road in certain period,

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hmm... Did the LTA state that under the new COE rules, upgrading the horsepower of vehicle will become illegal?

 

I do know that changing to a larger capacity engine is considered both illegal modification and tax fraud (road tax).

 

This is another grey area where LTA have not covered i guess...

 

I think the new scheme is practically useless. They just want us make feel that they have been following up with the car prices issue and they have reinforce with some measures to keep the price "affordable".

 

If a car is small yet powerful means it is more fuel efficient and also result in fuel saving. Sooner or later toyota and honda will join the small turbo/super charger scene.

Share this comment


Link to comment

It'll not be easy to monitor, esp ECU tuning, hardware mods like exhaust, intake still can see, but how to see if your car has been tuned?

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Lexus RX350L: The perfect motorway cruiser, save for one flaw...

    Is your S.O. always complaining about length? Well then this might be just the thing that she (or he?) is looking for. Lexus has extended (literally!) their popular RX model range to now include a three-row version, apparently because showroom visitors in the U.S.A have been asking for a seven-seater of their favorite SUV. Lexus inform us that numerous improvements have been made to this facelifted model of the RX350L in order to sharpen up its handling, including the use of new Laser Screw Welding and high-strength adhesives for the body, and new dampers equipped with a Friction Control Device to keep said body in check. And from the driver's seat, the car feels those improvements. Despite being such a large car, the whole thing steers accurately and is very easy to place on the road, after a little acclimatisation of course. Which is all well and good, but let's get real. Nobody is going to buy this Lexus with the expectation of razor-sharp handling through the roads of Kent Ridge.  So let's talk about how this car performs where it was truly designed to excel: On the highway. I would typically be the first to join the anti-SUV bandwagon but gosh, is this thing a revelation. Yes, you do get some float when you hit some low-frequency undulations at just the right speed, but I'll excuse the car's weight and necessarily soft damping. Everywhere else, the car rides over bumps with absolute aplomb. Ignore any camber changes and bumps on the road, you simply keep the steering wheel in the direction of intended travel and plough along, just as a proper limousine ought to. Mind you, this thing was riding on 20-inch rims as tested. But a quality ride does not alone make a good cruiser, and the RX350L also comes in hitting with supreme insulation. You genuinely will not be able to tell the quality of the tarmac as you ride along in the RX350L, either with your ears of through the steering wheel. With the three days I had the car I frequently found myself anticipating the hour in which I would be able to leave my desk just so that I can fall into the supple leather seats, shut the doors, and then just laze in the cabin's supreme quietness. It genuinely is that good. Combine this with the fact that the car comes with ventilated seats and an air-conditioning system that works very well, and I think you will not doubt when I say the car could rival many bedrooms for comfort levels. Which is a good thing then, because you do not want to have too many kids to ferry around in this thing. Third-row passengers are genuinely woefully catered for space-wise, although the forward two rows will get more than a generous share of the car's length. But hey, space for all that suspension travel and the rear double wishbones has to come from somewhere right? Fold the third-row down however, and you get a whopping 652 litres of boot space, so think of this as a covered luxury truck and you should be fine. And the one flaw with the car? Well, the 12 speaker system needs a bit of work. I'm no sound engineer for sure, but the car's speakers manage to combine that tinny effect you get from cheap earphones with the muddy sound you get from a bass-boosted headphone. It ain't terrible to listen to, but it sure as hell stands out when everywhere else you see and touch (and even the places you don't, read the full review) is so well put together. But if you can get over something like that and need a large SUV to ferry your kids along on your frequent Ikea runs, rest assured that this thing have the necessary length to satisfy anyone. Read the full review here!

    clarencegi75

    clarencegi75

    This Abang's gangster behaviour got me super pissed off (even when I'm typing this)

    In a video submitted to Roads.SG and uploaded on YouTube and Facebook, a recent case of road rage has got me fuming mad with a particular individual. However, I'll try to be as civil and professional as possible. The video was just uploaded about 3 hours ago and has already received more than 100 shares on Facebook. Here's the video, in case you haven't seen it. Video from Road.SG YouTube channel The driver and his mother were entering a HDB estate and driving towards the entrance of a carpark when a white Honda Vezel almost has a head-on collision with their car. Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel Reviewing the footage, you can see the Vezel was on the verge of crossing the white line to the opposing lane. The dashcam driver gives a honk, accident averted, and that should be the end of the story yes? No. An Abang decides that there was an injustice with the horn and goes all aggro on the dashcam driver. Abang wasn't even the driver of the Vezel! Abang:  The relationship between the Honda Vezel driver and Abang is not clear. Dashcam driver tries to defend himself and asks the Abang to look at his dashcam footage for proof, to which, the Abang says "don't need" multiple times. The spark to the argument The dashcam driver then says "Nevermind, LTA will see" and intends to drive off, but Abang  Dashcam driver loses his cool and disregarding the warnings of his mother, he steps out of the car to confront Abang. Abang asks a damn stupid question - "What's your problem?". Dude, the problem is you. But, I digress. Moving on, Abang starts screaming his lungs out at Dashcam Driver. He's so fierce that Dashcam Driver actually starts shivering (the subtitles in the video helps a lot). Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel Shifting over to camera phone footage All this time, we only caught a slight glimpse of Abang. But with video footage from a camera phone, you can now see Exhibit A of the Singaporean Douchebag - Angry Abang. Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel I don't know about you, but when he starts laughing at the camera and saying shit like: Doesn’t it tick you off?  The last straw My blood boils to its very core when he starts shouting at his mother - for presumably getting angry with his stupidity and trying to talk some sense into him. Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel Abang, you sir, are a turd aka shit. That's as vulgar as I can be in this article. What the people say Can get wife meh like that? Comments taken from Roads.SG Facebook page What do you think?

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

    Owner unwilling to pay after workshop rendered service

    A post about a customer who refused to pay after a battery replacement workshop rendered its services has gone viral online. Spotted on its own facebook page, FastFix Car Battery Replacement Service explained how the whole issue came about.  It wrote in its post that its client, Mr C, reached out to them saying that he needed help as his car could not start. After listening to the symptoms the car showed( car still cranks and aircon is not as strong as before), the workshop concluded that it needed a new battery. However, upon reaching Mr C, whose car was parked in the CBD and hence the need to pay for ERP charges, the guys from FastFix realised that it wasn't the battery that needed replacing.

    Concluding that there was nothing the guys from FastFix could do to help, Mr C was then asked to pay for the labour fee that had been pointed out before in their Whatsapp conversation. Unfortunately, Mr C disagreed and refused to pay the $50 that they had agreed on as nothing has been done to his Kia.  There was not much FastFix could do which probably prompted them to 'share their story' of the client on their facebook page.     Here are some of the notable comment in the post.

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    Keep calm brother. This Audi A4 Driver is going to kena one time big fine or worse, jail

    A recent video uploaded on SG Road Vigilante of an Audi A4 using red and blue flashing lights to impersonate law enforcement vehicles has gone viral. The “less than 24-hour old” video has since gone viral and has about 250 shares (as of present). Here’s the video if you haven’t already seen it Video from SG Road Vigilante YouTube Colours of the law At about 19 seconds into the video, we see an Audi A4 light up with red and blue flashing lights to overtake or get past the car that was recording the video. A string of vulgarities can be heard coming from the driver. This is forgivable because ANYBODY would be pissed off if they had to scoot over and give way to a “police vehicle” only to find out that it was all a big fat lie. Screenshot from SG Road Vigilante YouTube The video then shifts to the POV of the dash cam. The footage doesn’t show the red and blue flashing lights tho, but it does show where the incident took place – Terminal 4, Changi Airport. A weak chase ensues The driver then decides to chase the Audi down (which was uncalled for but ego probably kicked in). Screenshot from SG Road Vigilante YouTube However, they enter a single merging lane, and there’s a Hyundai Avante between them. For some reason, the Audi slows down at this single lane for a couple of seconds and the vulgarity spewing driver wastes no time in honking and high beaming to signal his displeasure. It’s a good thing that there was the Hyundai between them though or things might have escalated even further. The Audi seems like it wanted to stop but decided not to in the end and drove off. Angry driver tails for a while and the video cuts off. Two wrongs, no right We did some research and under no circumstance should you be using red and blue flashing lights unless you are from law enforcement. Image by Singtech.com.sg However, vulgarity spewing driver was obviously looking for a fight of sorts with all that aggression. Just keep calm lah! Why so angry? The video is evidence enough for him to kena by the real police what? Here’s what Singaporeans think Image from SG Road Vigilante Facebook This guy sounds like he’s got it all figured out.

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

×