Jump to content

Great day for school sports eclipsed by LTA-SMRT exchange

Great day for school sports eclipsed by LTA-SMRT exchange

Sign in to follow this  
ST_Opinion

14,253 views

blog-0774302001409499834.jpg

blogentry-133904-0-32662600-1409499755_thumb.jpg

An image from the Schools National C Division rugby championship final between Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) and St Andrew's Secondary last Tuesday has been making the rounds online. It is of both teams coming together to say a prayer and shake hands after battling each other on the field - a nice touch by the arch-rivals.

 

This is the story that should come to mind when people talk about the first schools final at the new National Stadium. Instead, that historic event for school sports will now be remembered for the very public exchange of words between the Land Transport Authority (LTA) and public transport operator SMRT over the charter of MRT trains by ACS(I).

 

The picture of foes coming together epitomises all that was missing in the LTA-SMRT saga, which involved the release of four press statements over four days and suggested little synergy between the two.

 

In the end, the head-on collision that seemed imminent was averted last Friday night when LTA said it would not be taking SMRT to task after all for failing to seek approval before chartering trains to ACS(I).

 

For SMRT, fined multiple times by the LTA over the last few years for service disruptions and breakdowns, the decision will come as a relief. For LTA, under pressure from commuters unhappy with a strained public transport system, the move, it said, showed that it takes its responsibility to safeguard public interests very seriously.

 

Yet, most of us watching the drama play out over the last few days have been left wondering what the fuss was all about.

 

ACS(I)'s unorthodox move to charter trains was done in part to mark it being in the first schools national sports final at the new National Stadium. To support their rugby team, about 3,000 students, staff and alumni boarded five trains from One-north station to Stadium station last Tuesday.

 

The decision to opt for trains was two-fold, said the school. One, it would reduce a logistical nightmare. The school estimated that it would need at least 80 buses to move that many people, which would put a strain on traffic around the stadium. Auxiliary police might also have been needed to manage traffic.

Second, at about $2 a head, the trains were more cost-effective than buses. SMRT was convinced the arrangement would have no impact on normal train operations, given the school's 1pm non-peak hour departure, with the chartered train shadowing a normal service train.

 

It was almost a perfect plan, save for one boo-boo: SMRT failed to seek LTA's approval, as stipulated under its Circle Line licence.

 

Never mind if precedents had been set, with schools opting for similar arrangements to shuttle students during National Education shows and National Day parades. SMRT still erred and for that, LTA felt it needed to be told off publicly. Yet, it is hard to see how the public wrist-slapping would benefit either party. It speaks more of the lack of communication between the two than anything else.

 

At a time when "conversation" seems to be the buzzword in the political arena, LTA's "fire first, ask questions later" approach is out of sync.

In a strongly worded statement last Tuesday, it said it was "looking into the appropriate action to take" against SMRT. Last Friday, however, LTA confirmed that the chartered rides had no impact on normal train operations and commuter safety, and so it chose not to sanction SMRT.

 

The authority's perceived change of heart makes one wonder if a better approach would have been for it to have some patience and check on the severity of any breach, before issuing a private warning.

 

Instead, the very public nature of the episode not only made the situation seem bigger than it was but also threw up more questions.

On Facebook posts and online forums, many wondered if the reluctance to be harsher had to do with ACS(I) being an elite independent school. But some also wondered if the LTA felt compelled to act because an elite school was involved, and it needed to ensure such schools do not enjoy special privileges.

In the end, it was a smart move by the school to secure the most efficient and least disruptive way to get its big contingent of supporters to the Sports Hub in the shortest time.

 

And it is a smart move by SMRT to make this charter option available without disrupting normal services because this fits in with its role as a public transport operator.

 

How differently this might all have played out if more of us knew you could charter trains, or if LTA could have seen the upside of supporting such a move by the train operators.

 

Besides, if you're heading to the Sports Hub, nothing beats taking the train there.

For everyone who knows school sports, an ACS(I)-St Andrew's rugby final is always special, and when the showdown between these arch-rivals is the first school final at the National Stadium, it has added significance.

 

On a day when sports should have been the winner - and a school's ability to move 3,000 supporters a spectacle in itself - it is a pity that the day will be remembered for an unnecessary public display of regulation.

 

ST Photo by Lim Sin Thai

Sign in to follow this  


4 Comments


Recommended Comments

As a commuter and a member of public, I seriously do not care about the significance of the match. So please spare me from any inconvenience.

 

I'm also wondering, its not unusual for schools to travel altogether to a destination

So what made this scenario special?

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

At $2 per head and 3,000 pax, total revenue from this special charter arrangement is $6,000. Does not make financial sense for SMRT to do it. Not an unbiased deal, and should not be the way a public transport operator conducts itself.

Share this comment


Link to comment

From someone who worked in a public transport Co. before, I would say someone in SMRT really made a boo-boo on this. The licence conditions are clear. I don't see anything wrong in what LTA did. In fact, I would even have supported a token fine especially if this was not the 1st time SMRT breached this condition.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Aiyah should have gotten the boys to route march all the way to the National Stadium (not sure if this requires license or not). Then it will really make a statement, at the same time toughen up the boys for their NS next time

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Motorcyclist doesn't check for oncoming traffic while making a right turn and ends up getting hit by a taxi

    This is why, in driving school, the instructors are always going on and on and on about checking for oncoming traffic when making a discretionary right turn, because you never know who or what might be coming from the other side. At the junction of North Coast Road and Woodlands Ave 9, this motorcyclist unfortunately did forget what he learned in driving school, seeing as he took off without fully checking if there were any other oncoming vehicles.  Thankfully for him, his bike seemed to take the brunt of the impact, even though the rider did go flying in the air a little. He even is able to look up after landing beside the taxi. The taxi also seems to have slowed down just enough before impact.  Sometimes, taking those extra few seconds to check for oncoming traffic while making a discretionary turn won't hurt. Especially if your view of oncoming traffic is blocked by a large vehicle. Better late than injured or worst, right?

    SGCM_editorial

    SGCM_editorial

    Traffic dispute convinces many that cyclists are getting out of hand

    Are cyclists getting out of hand these days?  We'd say so as more and more videos of cyclists ignoring traffic rules and getting angry with other road users have been surfacing. It doesn't help as COVID has encouraged more people to workout, with cycling fast becoming one of the more popular choices/excuses to get out of the house. According to SG Road Vigilante, this incident between 2 cyclists and the camera car happened on 30th August 2020 at 17:15 along east coast road. As the road is a single lane road, SGRV claims that the camera car wanted to overtake and horned at the cyclists that he/she is proceeding with an overtaking maneuver. Unfortunately, the cyclist wasn't happy and started some 'ah-beng taunting' actions. Do you think the cyclists in the videos are self-entitled? Or do you reckon the driver should have just queued up and drove slowly behind them? Let us know!    

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    BMW goes off speeding donning another car's licence plate!

    We thought things like this only happens in the movies but as it turns out, there are people doing this in real life as well! As seen on a Facebook post by SG Road Vigilante, the owner of this red 7-seater BMW 216D Grand Tourer wrote in to the page claiming that another BMW 2 Series in a similar shade of red has been using their number plate, chalking up fines they were not responsible for. However, this red 2 Series is a 5-seater variant that is called the Active Tourer and it looks largely similar as you can see from the screenshots taken from BMW Singapore's website.

    Reproduced below is an extract from the rightful owner of the plate SGX821M that was in SGRV's post.
      Hi, I was notified that you posted a video back in July on a speeding car with my license plate #SGX821M. I would like to highlight that THAT is not my car. Someone is impersonating us using our license plate. I drive a 7 seater BMW 2 series while the car in the video was a 5 seater 2 series. We were issued fines that we are not responsible for. AND my husband literally drove past the idiot this morning bearing our license plate while we were dropping our kids off to school. We couldn’t give chase because we were on opposite sides of the road. I have lodged a police report and have notified the LTA. We are awaiting investigations. If you happen to see the car, please help update the police on its whereabouts. Check out the video of the imposter who was also featured on SGRV before.

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    Accord driver goes bersek and lets camera car rear end him

    After watching this clip that was spotted on SG Road Vigilante, we can't help but see the importance of being able keep our own temper in control. Losing one's temper is easy and when not kept in check, you might end up doing something you will regret in the future. Shot on the evening of 26th of September 2020 along Central Blvd, a Honda Accord can be seen in the video cutting in from the left of the camera car at high speed before slamming onto its brakes real hard. The camera car, which itself seems to be going along at quite some speed, could not stop in time and crashed into the Accord as the result. While no one can confirm the Accord driver's intention, it is almost safe to say that he just wanted to let the camera knock into him by braking hard to a stop for no reason. As it was a slight bump, no one was hurt. The Accord driver then got out calmly and proceed to take some photos. So guys, what do you reckon? Is this part of a road rage incident which the camera car's footage did not show? Or is it an insurance scam? Or is it a combination of both? Let us know in the comments below!  

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

×