Jump to content

GM says its Corvette Stingray's Valet Mode might be illegal

GM says its Corvette Stingray's Valet Mode might be illegal

Sign in to follow this  
chitchatboy

4,308 views

blog-0287887001412075227.jpg

blogentry-133713-0-54671700-1412075210_thumb.jpgGM says its new C7 Corvette Stingray's Valet Mode might be illegal due to the privacy laws that are in place in 12 different U.S states. It seems that Chevrolet dealers have been instructed to tell owners to not use the Valet Mode from now on until a software update is available to make sure the system will be "consistent with legal requirement with regards to audio recording devices."

 

Yup, there are strict laws in states like California that deem the audio recording of people illegal unless both parties permit it. We think it would be a waste if was banned considering how the Valet Mode can monitor the car and lock out the infotainment system and glovebox to protect your car from being abused by the valets.

 

Curious how the Corvette Stingray's Valet Mode work? Watch the video below.

Sign in to follow this  


10 Comments


Recommended Comments

How about first enacting a law that illegalises the forced utilisation of valet services?

 

There are those users who prefer the convenience of a valet service and don't think twice about handing their cars off to a valet to park.

 

And then there are those who genuinely hate the very notion of having their pride-and-joy driven by a stranger. These people are nevertheless forced by some posh establishments to use the valet service. If they decline, they don't get to visit the establishment.

 

I think a law that empowers drivers to decline the valet service and park their own cars (without jeopardising their patronage of the establishment) should first be passed before this "privacy"-minded nonsensical law is enforced. Sometimes, the US legal system is quite ass-backwards.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yup, 100% agree.

How about first enacting a law that illegalises the forced utilisation of valet services?

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Cannot park elsewhere and walk to such places? Or take a cab? Are there places that ban pedestrians....

How about first enacting a law that illegalises the forced utilisation of valet services?

 

There are those users who prefer the convenience of a valet service and don't think twice about handing their cars off to a valet to park.

 

And then there are those who genuinely hate the very notion of having their pride-and-joy driven by a stranger. These people are nevertheless forced by some posh establishments to use the valet service. If they decline, they don't get to visit the establishment.

 

I think a law that empowers drivers to decline the valet service and park their own cars (without jeopardising their patronage of the establishment) should first be passed before this "privacy"-minded nonsensical law is enforced. Sometimes, the US legal system is quite ass-backwards.

 

How about first enacting a law that illegalises the forced utilisation of valet services?

 

There are those users who prefer the convenience of a valet service and don't think twice about handing their cars off to a valet to park.

 

And then there are those who genuinely hate the very notion of having their pride-and-joy driven by a stranger. These people are nevertheless forced by some posh establishments to use the valet service. If they decline, they don't get to visit the establishment.

 

I think a law that empowers drivers to decline the valet service and park their own cars (without jeopardising their patronage of the establishment) should first be passed before this "privacy"-minded nonsensical law is enforced. Sometimes, the US legal system is quite ass-backwards.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Cannot park elsewhere and walk to such places? Or take a cab? Are there places that ban pedestrians....

 

 

 

Just trying to be contrarian/argumentative as usual, are we?

 

By the same token - how about the establishment not even bother to offer *any* onsite parking at all, rather than a forced valet "service"? I'll tell you why - because if they put the kybosh on anyone driving to their establishment, their business would likely plummet. They want to have their cake and eat it too.

Share this comment


Link to comment

 

Just trying to be contrarian/argumentative as usual, are we?

 

By the same token - how about the establishment not even bother to offer *any* onsite parking at all, rather than a forced valet "service"? I'll tell you why - because if they put the kybosh on anyone driving to their establishment, their business would likely plummet. They want to have their cake and eat it too.

Yeah lor...I never poke you for long time ;)

 

But really - if any establishment wants to insist on valet - I won't go there. they can fark off from my business.

 

If I feel I must - then bo pian, walk or taxi lor.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yeah lor...I never poke you for long time ;)

 

But really - if any establishment wants to insist on valet - I won't go there. they can fark off from my business.

 

If I feel I must - then bo pian, walk or taxi lor.

 

Yeah, I missed you too buddy. [laugh]

 

The point is: the consumer must have a choice about letting others use their personal property without being discriminated against by any establishment.

 

Before they start going all ACLU about "privacy rights" related to the recording capabilities of a valet mode enabled car, I think that more basic question needs to be addressed first. That was my only point.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Singapore got such restaurants that force you to valet?

 

The closest one I experienced was at The Coastal Settlement. To park within the premise, need to use the valet. But that's understandable as they want to squeeze many cars into their small carpark and thus need a valet that has access to all the parked cars in order for earlier cars to exit. If you choose not to use the valet, there's plenty of nearby parking options. So I feel its not to the extend of being compulsory. Compulsory is when there is 1 and only 1 option.

 

I don't like valet too as I'm paranoid about losing stuff in my car.

Share this comment


Link to comment

 

Yeah, I missed you too buddy. [laugh]

 

The point is: the consumer must have a choice about letting others use their personal property without being discriminated against by any establishment.

 

Before they start going all ACLU about "privacy rights" related to the recording capabilities of a valet mode enabled car, I think that more basic question needs to be addressed first. That was my only point.

As far as I'm concerned - you park my car, you give up all rights to privacy. I can use whatever recording devices I like. Screw privacy laws

Share this comment


Link to comment

As far as I'm concerned - you park my car, you give up all rights to privacy. I can use whatever recording devices I like. Screw privacy laws

 

Don't think it is illegal here, yet, considering the amount of drivers who have an in-car camera is on the rise.

 

 

BTW - Video is marked as PRIVATE? Cannot watch?

 

Apologies Darryn, seems like the official Chevy youtube channel don't like the sharing of their video.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Man uploads video to shame DHL delivery driver, gets online backlash instead

    Here's a perfect example of how public shaming can come and bite you in the ass. In a recent video uploaded on Singapore Incidents' YouTube channel, an angry man chases down and confronts a DHL Delivery driver because the DHL driver allegedly pointed the middle finger at him. Here's the video if you haven't already seen it. In the video, the incident begins along the KPE when the DHL van does an e-brake in front of our angry man, who is driving behind the DHL van. Angry man proceeds to sound his displeasure with a couple of honks. Ideally, this should be the end of the story for most people. But, no. The angry man then proceeds to chase the DHL van like some road vigilante. As soon as angry man's car is parallel to the DHL van, we hear some cries of displeasure before he grabs his mobile device* (which was recording the whole incident) to capture DHL driver's face on video. *This is a chargeable offence by the way The video cuts off and jumps to the DHL driver sitting on the floor and speaking in dialect (Hokkien I think?) trying to justify his actions. It's not clear how they ended up out of their vehicles. Angry man then demands an apology from the DHL driver for pointing the middle finger at him. We think the finger-pointing might have happened when both their vehicles were parallel to one another (in the camera's blind spot). The DHL driver humbles himself and apologises in both Hokkien and English. But, angry man can't let sleeping dogs lie and submitted this video to shame the DHL driver. What the people say He should have just let it go after the apology and maybe he thought netizens would rally behind him. But, boy oh boy, was he wrong. What do you think?

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

    BMW driver brake checks cabbie resulting in accident on PIE!

    A video submitted to Singapore Reckless Drivers and circulating on Facebook depicts an accident that took place along the PIE towards BKE after Steven Road exit around 9:24 am on 20 January 2020. In the video, you can clearly see that the BMW abruptly cut the Trans-Cab's lane. And then, this typical BMW driver decided to hit the brake to show his macho-ness. And due to some ego issues with the cab driver, they bang on each other. Here's the full video. Let this serve as a gentle reminder to all drivers out here! Please drive graciously this Chinese New Year! Don't risk you and your passenger over such trivial disputes. Anyway, there is a reason why BMW drivers are hated so much. Drive safe BMWs! 🙂  

    kobayashiGT

    kobayashiGT

    This Abang's gangster behaviour got me super pissed off (even when I'm typing this)

    In a video submitted to Roads.SG and uploaded on YouTube and Facebook, a recent case of road rage has got me fuming mad with a particular individual. However, I'll try to be as civil and professional as possible. The video was just uploaded about 3 hours ago and has already received more than 100 shares on Facebook. Here's the video, in case you haven't seen it. Video from Road.SG YouTube channel The driver and his mother were entering a HDB estate and driving towards the entrance of a carpark when a white Honda Vezel almost has a head-on collision with their car. Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel Reviewing the footage, you can see the Vezel was on the verge of crossing the white line to the opposing lane. The dashcam driver gives a honk, accident averted, and that should be the end of the story yes? No. An Abang decides that there was an injustice with the horn and goes all aggro on the dashcam driver. Abang wasn't even the driver of the Vezel! Abang:  The relationship between the Honda Vezel driver and Abang is not clear. Dashcam driver tries to defend himself and asks the Abang to look at his dashcam footage for proof, to which, the Abang says "don't need" multiple times. The spark to the argument The dashcam driver then says "Nevermind, LTA will see" and intends to drive off, but Abang  Dashcam driver loses his cool and disregarding the warnings of his mother, he steps out of the car to confront Abang. Abang asks a damn stupid question - "What's your problem?". Dude, the problem is you. But, I digress. Moving on, Abang starts screaming his lungs out at Dashcam Driver. He's so fierce that Dashcam Driver actually starts shivering (the subtitles in the video helps a lot). Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel Shifting over to camera phone footage All this time, we only caught a slight glimpse of Abang. But with video footage from a camera phone, you can now see Exhibit A of the Singaporean Douchebag - Angry Abang. Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel I don't know about you, but when he starts laughing at the camera and saying shit like: Doesn’t it tick you off?  The last straw My blood boils to its very core when he starts shouting at his mother - for presumably getting angry with his stupidity and trying to talk some sense into him. Screenshot taken from Roads.SG YouTube Channel Abang, you sir, are a turd aka shit. That's as vulgar as I can be in this article. What the people say Can get wife meh like that? Comments taken from Roads.SG Facebook page What do you think?

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

    The reason why people think Singaporeans are cheap

    A recent Roads.sg video of two men using super unorthodox techniques to fill up a gas tank has caught the attention of many Singaporeans. At the time of writing this article, the post has since garnered over 100 comments (I’ll share some at the end of this article) which are pretty one-sided.    Here’s the video if you haven’t already seen it. If you have, watch it again. It' bloody hilarious! Video from Roads.sg YouTube Channel Confirm Singaporean According to the Roads.sg video description, this incident occurred across the causeway.   Screenshot from Roads.sg YouTube Channel The owner of what we believe to be a 2016 Toyota Vios, is definitely a Singaporean. I can say this with assurance because I've pumped petrol in J.B. before and you only ever see Singaporeans do stupid shit like this while Malaysians laugh at us. The back of the car looks similar! Do you save money in the end? If you're not too familiar with what is going on, the logic is simple. Bubbles are formed when you pump petrol in your car and these bubbles take up precious space in your fuel tank that could go to more fuel. Therefore, if you shake your car, the bubbles will dissipate, allowing you to get more petrol and more savings. Alright, you might save a couple of bucks, but the repercussions don't make sense to me. Not worth it You will eventually wreck your rear suspension which is not cheap to repair. You look like an idiot You give Singaporeans a bad name You will kena caught on video like this guy and, everyone will know you for the wrong reasons What the people say The answer is nothing. You saved nothing. Pretty sure he is. Facebook comments taken from Roads.sg Facebook Page That’s funny af.

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

×