Jump to content

The case for more taxis

The case for more taxis

Sign in to follow this  
ST_Opinion

14,752 views

blog-0522866001415265657.jpg

blogentry-133904-0-95931900-1415265455_thumb.jpgTHE Land Transport Authority (LTA) recently announced it would lower the annual vehicle growth rate from the current 0.5 per cent to 0.25 per cent from February next year to January 2018.

 

That affects the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) quota for car ownership.

 

The reason given? "With 12 per cent of Singapore's total land area already taken up by roads, there is limited scope for any further expansion of the road network," LTA said.

 

Singapore's success in maintaining a largely low-congestion and efficient transport system is commendable.

 

And since car ownership and usage imposes costs on non-users - pollution, congestion, noise, to name a few - controls are justified.

Luxury car ownership is a form of conspicuous consumption which people indulge in as a display of wealth. Such goods should be taxed heavily, including through the COE, as they contribute to higher prices for consumers.

 

As for the external costs of car usage, these should be charged through petrol taxes or road pricing, like the electronic road pricing (ERP). Petrol in Singapore is more affordable than in many other countries.

 

Bloomberg ranked Singapore 11 out of 61 countries for petrol affordability. Only 4.3 per cent of average daily wages is needed to buy one gallon of petrol. Singapore's petrol taxes-to-price ratio is much lower than that in Australia, New Zealand and all European Union countries. There is thus scope to increase petrol taxes here. If that were done, there would be scope to not cut the COE quota, especially for low-end cars.

 

That, in turn, would allow more middle-income people, especially those with children, to own cars.

 

A good complement is an increase in the number of taxis. Singapore already has a high ratio of taxis per thousand population of 5.2, as compared to cities such as Amsterdam, Berlin, Hong Kong, Lisbon and Paris. However, this figure does not match that in cities such as New York (6.3) or London (8.5), where for-hire private services - included in the figures above - also play a significant role. The ratio is even higher in Dublin (10.58) and Washington (12.5).

 

During peak hours, commuters here may have to wait for 20 or even 30 minutes for a taxi, according to surveys published by the LTA. As the incomes of taxi drivers are not high, only above $2,000 a month in 2012, if the number of taxis were to go up, there should also be an increase in taxi fares. Most taxi passengers are middle- and higher-income earners. Time and convenience are more important to them. Most of them are willing to pay more in fares if availability improves.

 

If taxis were more available, that would persuade more people not to own cars. It would also make the unaffordability of high COE prices less annoying.

 

Another alternative for commuters would be to travel by public transport, which has even less external costs. But the inherent trade-off would be convenience and comfort. In this sense, taxis occupy the middle ground between efficiency and convenience. Still, if public transport were efficient and taxis readily available, the need for car ownership would be much reduced.

 

Guangzhou is planning to have 2,950 on-call taxis to supplement its on-the-road taxi fleet. The non-cruising taxis would be more expensive than the normal taxis. In the case of Singapore, such on-call taxis are not necessary, as more ordinary taxis would probably be sufficient. However, providing urgent booking at a higher fare may be desirable to ensure that important trips are serviced with near certainty.

 

On the other hand, the call by Guangzhou taxi drivers for higher fuel subsidy is counter-efficient. Petrol should be taxed, not subsidised. The Singapore Government should not go down such a path, no matter how populist it may be. Still, continuing public education is needed to maintain this happy situation here.

 

-- ST FILE PHOTO

 

by Ng Yew-Kwang and Yi Xin for The Straits Times

 

Ng Yew-Kwang is Winsemius Professor in Economics at Nanyang Technological University. Yi Xin is an economics student at NTU.

 

Sign in to follow this  


1 Comment


Recommended Comments

Taxi driver attitude and passion is more important then having a lot more taxi.

1. SG taxis choose customers during the peak hours by winding down the window to check destination while driving at a slow speed to aviod passenger hopping on.

2. SG taxi hang around empty to wait for booking instead of picking up passengers on the streets or taxi stands.

3. SG taxi drivers parked and refuse to drive when it start to rain which left so many passenger stranded citing it is more risky when they drive in the rain.

4. SG taxi drivers tried to ask for booking charges at peak hours if not he will not pick you up on the street or taxi stand. (not to common but i personally met up with one merc cab who did that)

So having more taxi does not necessary solve the problem.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Traffic Police bike gets into accident while chasing offender

    Now this is not something the residents of Ang Mo Kio get to see everyday! A Traffic Police officer has apparently skidded on the wet floor and crashed his Yamaha bike at the lift lobby of Block 619 Ang Mo Kio. As reported by SG Road vigilante, the incident happened on 27 May 2020 and eye witnesses claim that the officer was trying to chase another motorbike through the void deck when the police officer lost control and hit the wall. The comments by netizens were generally supportive of the officer going all the way in the fight for justice, with the usual few negative views here and there. 
     

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    Someone is keen to show that their Swift Sport can do 180km/h on the CTE!

    Now this is not very smart. Thanks to social media apps like Instagram allowing news to spread like bush fire, you now best keep your 'bad' stuff to yourself... Check out this video of some mates videoing themselves going at high speed on our expressways in the wee morning of 10th May 2020. As seen on SG Road Vigilante, this insta story posted by n1zem, shows them going as fast as 180km/h in their Suzuki Swift Sport. Granted, the roads are pretty empty as we are in the midst of the Circuit Breaker period but there is still no reason for going this fast.  For those who are wondering, 'Naked Crew" is a local car group and they can be found on Instagram. As usual, the comments by netizens are harsh and probably a bit hurtful. 1.mp4

    What to do with neighbours who install loud exhaust systems for their cars

    If there's something strange in the neighbourhood, who you gonna call? Ghostbusters! If there's something unbearable like the loud exhaust from an RX-8 (I think it’s an RX-8), who you gonna call? LTA! LTA takes your complaints seriously In a post uploaded on SG Road Vigilante, a video and various images of 2 LTA officers checking out the undercarriage of an RX-8 has gone viral. Here's the link to the long video (might take awhile to load because it’s 4mins+ long, I suggest skimming through the video). The story behind this Apparently, a "pek cek" (exasperated) neighbour could not take the sound of the car’s exhaust and made a complaint to LTA. The neighbour even left a note for the owner of the car. Online Chatter I can feel the passion from this comment. Very interesting plot twist. I think the neighbour will have to lan lan suck thumb, wear earplugs.  Err. LTA stands for Land Transport Authority. If you want to complain Have a neighbour with too much money and owns a car that disrupts the peace of the neighbourhood? Call LTA @ 1800 2255 582 The officers will come down to investigate in no time.

    Honda Stream gets Covid-19 slammed out of it by BMW 6 Series at Changi Village

    This accident happened at Changi Village hawker centre carpark. You can watch the full video of the accident below courtesy of Roads.sg (if you haven't already seen it)   What’s happening Honda Stream exits the carpark and attempts to make a right turn on a two-way road. The driver seems oblivious to the fact that there's a stop sign and inches the car onto the main road. The Honda Steam driver then jams the brakes and in less than a second, what looks like a BMW 6 Series crashes into it. Hard. Different points of view If you replay the video, you'll notice that even after the crash, there were no cars that went past on the other side of the road. Meaning, the Honda Stream had more than enough time and space to avoid the accident. Jam break for what? The driver also ignored the stop sign and failed to do proper checks before moving off. On the other hand, based on the sheer force of impact, the BMW was going pretty fast too. What the people say This sounds legit. I think it's the Honda Stream driver's fault. The BMW driver sway balls. Also, there's a lesson here people - Stay the #$%& at home.
×