Jump to content

E-bikes are everywhere

E-bikes are everywhere

Sign in to follow this  
chitchatboy

20,772 views

blog-0566361001478499379.jpg

blogentry-133713-0-88992400-1478499334_thumb.jpgA horrific accident involving a trailer and three electric bicycles last month - which killed two riders and injured the third - has put e-bikes in the spotlight once again.

 

It is easy to get carried away and say we should do this or that - including banning such contraptions - to prevent more loss of life and limb. But there is a danger of throwing the baby out with the bath water in the process if we are not careful.

 

First of all, some perspective. Accidents happen. And more often than not, riders bear the brunt in a collision - be they cyclists, e-bike riders or motorcyclists. Pedestrians too are particularly vulnerable. Unlike occupants of a car, van, bus or truck (excluding those who occupy the open deck), they are not shielded.

 

Statistics show as much. Between 2004 and last year, the number of fatal and injury accidents involving motorcycles numbered 55,896. That translates to 33 per cent of all such road accidents - inordinately high given that motorcycles account for only 15 per cent of Singapore's vehicle population.

 

So, should we ban motorcycles then? Obviously, not.

 

We should take the recent accident as another wake-up call to take a closer look at what is a fast-evolving world of wheels. Bicycles, e-bikes and other similar devices are fast becoming a significant part of the mobility landscape as Singapore encourages "active mobility".

 

Statistically, their proliferation is likely to be followed by a rise in accident cases. According to the Traffic Police, there were 6,327 fatal and injury accidents involving bicycles and e-bikes between 2004 and last year. The number, which translates to 3.7 per cent of all such accidents, does not include cases which occur on pavements and elsewhere. It covers only road incidents. The Straits Times has asked repeatedly for off-road statistics, but none of the agencies and the ministry involved has disclosed them.

 

But even if we look at the road figures alone, a worrying trend emerges. Last year, fatal and injury accidents involving bicycles and e-bikes rose for the second consecutive year to hit a 12-year record of 643. While the data does not tell the full story without a bicycle population figure (bicycles and e-bikes are not required to be registered here), it is still a useful indicator. It shows the accident figure climbed 38 per cent from 2013. Also, the figure was almost 25 per cent larger than the average for the preceding 11 years.

 

If cases involving e-scooters, e-skateboards, e-unicycles and other personal mobility devices - motorised or manual - are included, the figure is likely to be significantly higher.

 

HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK

 

And because these devices are going to be more prevalent very quickly - thanks to technology, e-commerce and competition - it is imperative that Singapore comes up with a holistic framework to regulate all forms of mobility contraptions soon.

 

There are already 11,600 e-bikes here. The figure excludes the illegal, unlicensed vehicles. It also excludes the myriad of other mobility devices, which are likely to have overtaken e-bikes in numbers. Last month, The Straits Times reported that e-scooter sales were soaring, with one distributor saying it was selling more than 400 units a month.

 

If that is so, it means 4,800 units a year. And that is just one retailer. These devices are available literally everywhere, from hardware stores to supermarkets to malls.

 

And going by those we often see on the road, on pavements and on park connectors, most are modified to go faster than the allowable top speed of 25kmh.

 

So, where do we start?

 

First, we must recognise that all of these devices serve a crucial role in getting people from point A to B, and are part of the huge mobility universe which encompasses buses, trains, taxis, motorcycles and, yes, even cars. So banning them is out of the question.

 

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has already put in place some rules to regulate them, such as restricting speed, weight, power output and, in the case of e-bikes, banning those with a throttle.

 

But clearly, there is more to be done. It is one thing to produce rules and regulations, and another to publicise them clearly and loudly.

 

Enforcement must be in place to ensure users abide by those rules and regulations.

 

IMPORT LIMITATIONS

 

One practical measure is to ensure that only machines which meet regulations are imported. This will go a long way in making enforcement easier. This measure will, however, require inter-ministerial cooperation.

 

At the same time, there must be strong enforcement against illegal ones which are already here, as well as modifications, similar to what the LTA does for cars. Yes, the authority has cracked down on a few shops, but it will be like battling

 

Hydra if nothing is done to curb the importation of parts used in modifications.

 

At the same time, users should be informed about the perils of modification - whether done on e-bike or e-scooter. Most, if not all, modifications focus solely on raising power output. Other components, such as the brakes, are left untouched.

 

Such machines will not have sufficient braking power, especially in an emergency. Or their battery management system could go wonky, rendering a sudden loss of power, which again will spell doom in an emergency.

 

As with all road safety initiatives, enforcement must be accompanied by education. Users must recognise that they are not easily visible because of their relatively small footprint.

 

Drivers of heavy vehicles, who already face many blind spots, will be doubly hard put to spot a rider attempting to squeeze in between him and another vehicle or the kerb. All riders, not just e-bike users, must be made to realise this.

 

They should also be required to wear helmets and have adequate illumination at the back and front. At the same time, such illumination must not blind other users.

 

Rules governing the use of phones and other handheld devices which apply to drivers must apply to the new breed, too.

 

It is a daunting and unenviable task for lawmakers and regulators, but it is absolutely necessary that they get it right.

 

More so now that we are proposing to allow bicycles and mobility devices on the pavement.

 

Separately, this will call for a seismic shift in culture, norms and mindset on the part of the public. Throw a people who are not known for their graciousness into the mix and we have volatile situations filled with frayed nerves, bruised knees, or worse.

 

Because even with current regulations, an e-scooter with a top speed of 25kmh can still do a lot of damage if it hits a pedestrian. But again, the same can be said of a bicycle. It does not help that our pavements are generally narrow.

 

Plans to double the cycling path network to 700km by 2030 will help, even if it is 14 years away. And work will start by the year end on a 150km round-island park connector, which will link the current 300km network.

 

Hopefully, over time, pedestrians, mums pushing prams, old folk in wheelchairs, cyclists, food delivery bikers, e-scooter riders and everybody else getting from here to there will learn to live and let live.

 

Until then, it is clear the State must do more.

 

The following article is written by Christopher Tan, Senior Transport Correspondent with The Straits Times and Consulting Editor for motoring monthly Torque.

Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    OK Boomers! We have the car you have been asking for.. Or is it?

    The Toyota Camry has always had an 'uncle's car' stigma to it, but the new one now is dressed with radically sportier and sharper looks, so is it necessarily deserving of the association? We put one to the test! Toyota and Lexus alike have a perchance for large grilles, and it seems the Camry has no qualms about sporting the same! So no prizes for guessing what captures Jon's attention here As you would expect, the Camry is really well appointed inside, But Julian finds something he really likes about the dash! And is it comfortable to drive? I think this picture tells alot... Or maybe the sgCarMart crew is a lot busier than they look? So is the new Camry still deserving of its 'Uncle's car' image? Or has the sporty image come with upgrades to the rest of the car befitting of a younger audience? You have to watch the full video to find out!  

    clarencegi75

    clarencegi75

    A woman being a PUBIC nuisance on Middle Road. No, that's not a typo

    You probably have seen a video that went viral recently about a woman removing her clothes in anger on Middle Road. She even went as far as pulling down her panties! If you haven’t, here’s the video courtesy of Roads.sg In the video, you can see a woman taking off her clothes in response to a man (a cab driver) walking away from her. She is believed to have done this to play the victim card and make false accusations that the cab driver was the one who did it to her. Crucial eye witness account An eye witness of the incident posted the video on Roads.sg According to the witness, he saw the lady kicking the cab. She then began chasing the cab driver, scratching, punching and going all bat shit crazy. The driver did not retaliate to her provocation. So what triggered this? There have been no reports (as of yet) as to what led to this behaviour, but theories are being thrown around on social media. Even I would be offended. At least give me $10 What happened in the end In a recent STOMP article posted earlier today, it’s been confirmed that the lady, a 31-year old woman was arrested for PUBLIC nuisance. Yeap, I spelt that one right. You can read the full article here

      Header image by STOMP

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

    No inspiration for your holiday plans? Check out this MyCarForum member's drive through the Pacific Coast Highway in a C-HR!

    MyCarForum member 'therock' shared with us this week his latest adventure all the way from the U.S.A's Pacific West Coast! With plenty of B-roads to savour, amazing sights to take in and jolly good food to boot, what more could you ask from a driving holiday? Here's what I think is the best part of the thread: The drive was done in the popular Toyota C-HR, what a madman! In his own words, therock "wanted to try a car which (he) might consider buying and (he) wanted an SUV so it came down to the RAV4 or the C-HR depending what was available." Thankfully, the U.S-spec C-HR comes as a 2.0-litre which we imagine must be way better for chewing through those long distances than the local 1.2-litre spec car. Talking about chewing... the thread has plenty of glorious food porn as well. Cause you know, AMERICA! Looks like therock is still uploading more pictures of his epic drive, so do go down and check out the rest of the thread here! All pictures are shared here courtesy of MyCarForum member therock.   ----------------------------------------------- Check out the rest of the thread by therock here! And if the post has inspired you to embark on your own drive don't forget to leave a like or a comment! -----------------------------------------------

    clarencegi75

    clarencegi75

    VEP delayed till 2020 or maybe when your grandchildren have children

    If you've been one of the "kan cheong" people waiting to get your Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) approved before driving into Malaysia, here's some good news for you - The implementation of the VEP scheme will only commence next year. According to The Straits Times, Malaysian Transport Minister Anthony Loke claimed that the delay is due to the system's inability to cope with the exponential number of vehicles that needed to install the RFID tag. It seems that many Singaporeans are not surprised by this delay. It’s not the first time that there has been a delay with the implementation of the VEP and you can be sure people were quick to call that out.  And some people make pretty sound arguments. Wait, does this mean that Singaporean car owners with the RFID tags did the application and probably wasted a weekend queueing up in Malaysia for nothing? Sounds about right.  Malaysia Boleh? Case closed. ----------------------------------------------- Still wondering how to get your VEP? We went through the entire process so you can have this handy guide here! -----------------------------------------------  

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

×