Jump to content

New cars will outgrow parking lots soon

New cars will outgrow parking lots soon

chitchatboy

18,236 views

blog-0532416001479888505.jpg

blogentry-133713-0-63038100-1479888502_thumb.jpgA U.K. insurance company has reported that car parking accidents have cost U.K. motorists S$2.47 million and believe the size of new cars now is the cause.

 

According to the report by specialist Accident Exchange, accidents happening in car parks accounted for 30.85 percent of all claims by the company in the last year. It is an increase of almost 8 percent compared to the previous year and the the company believe that the culprit might actually be the sheer size of their cars.

 

To put things into perspective, the British government’s recommended length for a parking space is set at 4,800 mm but the average family sedan like the Ford Mondeo is already longer than the space by 71mm.

 

In an interview with Autocar, the company’s Director of Operations Scott Hamilton-Cooper was quoted, "Drivers are having to squeeze increasingly large cars into spaces that generally haven’t got any larger for a very long time. Almost all of the councils we researched carried over the government’s recommendation, which makes things tight for large cars."

 

 

Locally, our parking space is set by the Land Transport Authority at 4,800mm and 2,400mm wide.




4 Comments


Recommended Comments

That is why I feel cars should be taxed by their dimensions (height also since they block the view and contribute to road hazard) instead of cc.

 

The gasoline tax is already effectively taxing cc.

Link to comment

That is why I feel cars should be taxed by their dimensions (height also since they block the view and contribute to road hazard) instead of cc.

 

The gasoline tax is already effectively taxing cc.

Why so complicating? Are you driving a big car longer than 4.8m now and wished to be taxed voluntarily?
Link to comment

That is why I feel cars should be taxed by their dimensions (height also since they block the view and contribute to road hazard) instead of cc.

 

The gasoline tax is already effectively taxing cc.

Then lorry or pick up truck how?

Link to comment

Then lorry or pick up truck how?

 

Commercial vehicles are already being effectively subsidized by cars now. e.g. lower ARF etc

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Is 'tiny living' really irrelevant in Singapore?

    I discussed the possibility of living in tiny houses in Singapore in an earlier blog post. But as we know, it isn't an option to begin with – no thanks, of course, to our lack of land space.  Someone also pointed out that the idea of tiny houses is "romanticised" – which, I don't deny (but hey, that's why it's a dream). While it's clear tiny houses aren't going to work out here, the concept of 'tiny living' is; not just physically but also mentally. Anyone who has lived enough years lo
×
×
  • Create New...