Jump to content

Grab, Uber not exempt from child-seat rules: LTA

Grab, Uber not exempt from child-seat rules: LTA

chitchatboy

13,164 views

blog-0054566001486032922.jpg

blogentry-133713-0-45237900-1486032855_thumb.jpgRide-hailing services such as Grab and Uber are not exempt from rules requiring car seats for young children, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said yesterday.

 

Under the Road Traffic Act, it is illegal for cars to carry passengers under 1.35 metres tall without a booster seat or a child restraint.

 

Taxis are excluded from this ruling as they are considered "public service vehicles", while private-hire car services are not.

 

Offenders face a fine of $120 and three demerit points.

 

If charged in court, they can be fined up to $1,000 or jailed up to three months.

 

LTA said taxis are exempt as it would be "quite unreasonable" for taxi drivers to have to turn away street-hail fares with children under 1.35 metres tall and babies.

 

"We are not exempting private-hire cars because they are pre-booked and passengers can indicate if they require booster seats or child restraints when making the booking," said a spokesman.

 

In a fatal accident last June, two young boys, who were not in child seats, were injured after their family's car crashed into a tree in Lentor Avenue.

 

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin, Chairman for the Government Parliamentary Committee on Transport, said that child-seat regulations for private-hire cars should be "considered and reviewed".

 

"The key issue here is whether (private-hire cars) should also be deemed as public service vehicles and therefore be exempt from having child seats for children under 1.35m tall," he added.

 

Nanyang Technological University transport consultant Gopinath Menon said there are "practical difficulties" in making child seats mandatory.

 

Child seats cannot be permanently installed in taxis and private-hire cars because they ferry different passengers on each trip, he said. The driver would have to keep the seat in the car boot and set it up whenever a child is among the passengers.

 

But National University of Singapore transport researcher Lee Der Horng said laws requiring car seats should be "universally applicable".

 

"There is no strong reason why taxis should be exempted from the rule. It's about safety," he said.

 

As more commuters use booking apps to hire taxis, operators could add an option to request car seats, he said.

 

Since last August, Grab has offered the option of booking GrabFamily, a six-seater car with a booster seat installed for children between the ages of four and seven.

 

In a blog post yesterday, Grab said it was monitoring GrabFamily and "did not rule out" introducing baby seats in the future.

 

In overseas markets, Uber offers UberFamily, a service that allows passengers to request a child seat. It is not currently available here.

 

The following article is written by Zhaki Abdullah, a Correspondent with The Straits Times.




2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Why are "public service vehicles and therefore be exempt from having child seats for children under 1.35m tall"? - Public service vehicles will not get into accident, or their passengers will miraculously not get injured just bec they are in public service vehicles (aka Taxi)?? What stoopid logic is this? The authorities who wrote this piece of crap rule to exempt the taxis, shld hv their head examined or made to take taxi without seat belts on.. see if they will die if the taxi kena head on accident.. really PHD...

Link to comment

LTA - Exactly what are you doing? Are you sure you know what you are doing at all?

 

The road is the same but you have different rules and regulations imposed on different types of drivers.

 

Do you mean one group of drivers are safer than the other and hence, some rules apply and some rules don't apply.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Is 'tiny living' really irrelevant in Singapore?

    I discussed the possibility of living in tiny houses in Singapore in an earlier blog post. But as we know, it isn't an option to begin with – no thanks, of course, to our lack of land space.  Someone also pointed out that the idea of tiny houses is "romanticised" – which, I don't deny (but hey, that's why it's a dream). While it's clear tiny houses aren't going to work out here, the concept of 'tiny living' is; not just physically but also mentally. Anyone who has lived enough years lo

    dailydoseofcoffee

    dailydoseofcoffee

×
×
  • Create New...