Jump to content

Uber's autonomous car involved in fatal crash

Uber's autonomous car involved in fatal crash

Sign in to follow this  



blogentry-114362-0-69632900-1521511019_thumb.jpgA self-driving car operated by the ride-hailing company Uber has been involved in a fatal accident with a pedestrian in Tempe, Arizona.


The unnamed woman was reported to have been crossing the road when she was struck. Despite being rushed to hospital, she later died from her injuries.


Reports indicate while a driver was present behind the wheel, the car was in autonomous mode at the time of the collision. No passengers were in the Uber when the collision occurred.


Uber has suspended all trials of self-driving cars in light of the incident. The company has been running a fleet of autonomous vehicles across various locations in North America, including Pittsburgh, Toronto and San Francisco.


A brief statement released by the company said: "Our hearts go out to the victim’s family. We are fully cooperating with local authorities in their investigation of this incident."


A statement released by Tempe police described the incident further: "The vehicle involved is one of Uber's self-driving vehicles. It was in autonomous mode at the time of the collision, with a vehicle operator behind the wheel.


"The vehicle was traveling northbound just south of Curry Rd. when a female walking outside of the crosswalk crossed the road from west to east when she was struck by the Uber vehicle. She was transported to a local area hospital where she passed away from her injuries. Her next of kin has not been notified yet so her name is not being released at this time. Uber is assisting and this is still an active investigation."


blogentry-114362-0-61481100-1521511163_thumb.jpgThe crash follows a fatal accident in May 2016, when the driver of a Tesla Model S in Autopilot semi-autonomous mode died after his car collided with a lorry. Investigations indicated the Tesla's Autopilot system failed to differentiate between the truck’s white trailer and a bright sky.


This latest crash is the first time a pedestrian has been reported killed in an accident involving an autonomous car, however, and is likely to cause policymakers to look closely at future legislation that allows self-driving car testing on public roads.


Earlier this month, the UK Government announced a wide-ranging legal review into self-driving cars, with a view to investigating how ““current driving laws can support the next generation of vehicles.”

Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    BMW Alpina B5: Comfortable Cruiser

    Who says performance cars need to come with a sporty ride? Last week we tested the BMW Alpina B5 to see if Alpina's take on the performance saloon is a viable alternative to the BMW M5. So what sets this Alpina apart? Firstly, the interior has received a host of luxurious touches to set it apart from the regular 5-series: The digital dashboard in the B5 has its own Alpina-specific design and colour scheme, for example, while the handcrafted Alpina steering wheel is made of Lavalina leather (the same leather used in Rolls-Royce cars), and features blue/green stitching. But what truly sets this car apart from the rest of the performance saloon pack is what is underneath you: With a suspension designed to deliver comfort and refinement in spades, the Alpina is not just comfortable, but sublimely comfortable. Adding to the comfortable cruise is the fact that the B5 is joyously easy-going to drive, with the lightest of pressure on the accelerator sending the car wafting rapidly down the road. With the abundance of humps and rumble strips on our local roads, would Alpina's take on the performance saloon, with its effortless and classy character, be a better suit for your everyday commute? Read our full review here!



    All 75 McLaren Senna GTRs sold

    This year’s Geneva Motor Show saw the launch of the McLaren Senna GTR and although it is only a concept, all of the available units have been sold.   Limited to only 75 units, the Senna GTR is a track only car and according to McLaren Automotive CEO Mike Flewitt stated that 50 examples of the Senna GTR were accounted for when it came out.   Costing more than S$1.8 million in the U.S., at least 150 customers expressed interest in purchasing a Senna GTR at Geneva but only 25 of these buyers managed to get their hands on one.   With an estimated 24bhp increase, revised suspension, a race-style gearbox and other enhancement, the GTR variant of the car will be a more much fearsome machine than its road-going variant.



    Apple is invading the motoring world!

    First, Rolls Royce says you can customise your Rolls on your Iphone. Then comes Toyo tires with an Iphone app about tires. And not to mention the various Ihpone/Ipod touch apps with car adverts as games such as Volkswagen and Audi. Even Red Bull racing has come up with a free app for you to 'race' their F1 car. Apple is totally taking over the motoring world with their apps and the concept of it all. And I love it!   Now Volkswagen have become the first to publish a magazine specifically for Apple's new Ipad. Newly named, 'DAS', it stands for Digital Automotive Space and its a new addition to Volkswagen's revamped marketing strategy. No doubt will that help advertise more for Apple, (not like they need any more advertising) but it opens up new avenues for car manufacturers to reach out to consumers. Moreover, I believe Apple and the Volkswagen group have similar branding strategies; simplistic, stylish and sleek. And that blends in perfectly when it comes to apps for the Ipad. You can view the new Volkswagen Touraeg in a full 360 degrees view and go through all the specifications, its only a matter of time before car brochures enter the Apps store..   I've personally gone through stuff on the Ipad and everything looks amazing, so why not add in magazines like these as Apps? With all the games and other mish mash in Apple's App store, car manufacturers like VW have created one that shouts 'Info-tainment' and I think that will do nothing but boost their sales even more.   Brilliant move by VW..



    Wake-up call for sleep-deprived drivers

    IF YOU cause a fatal accident because you drive when you are sleep-deprived, you may be jailed for up to two years, or fined, or both.   In the past, the courts in Singapore have typically only fined but not jailed motorists who cause death by negligent driving. In a recent case, however, a special court of three judges headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon found that jail time was warranted.   On March 13 last year, casino surveillance officer Hue An Li, then 26, had stayed out with friends for 12 hours immediately after finishing a 12-hour shift at work. When driving home afterwards - having gone without sleep for 24 hours continuously - she blanked out at the wheel and rear-ended a lorry.   Indian national Mahalingam Rajesh, 30, was killed while 11 other people in the lorry were injured, including one who was paralysed from the waist down.   There are many overworked and sleep-deprived people in Singapore, but the law has not paid sufficient attention to the risks involved in driving without adequate rest.   As such, even drowsy drivers who are involved in deadly accidents have been punished with mere fines - until this case.   Sleep is a biological requirement that can't be overcome with will power, determination or training. Research suggests that the adverse effects of sleep deprivation kick in when adults get less than five hours of sleep a night. Of these effects, the impairment of vision and coordination are the two most relevant to drowsy driving.   Since the early 1990s, studies have shown that sleep deprivation causes cognitive impairment akin to that induced by alcohol.   British researchers have shown that 17 to 18 hours of no-sleep will reduce a motorist's performance level to that of someone with a blood alcohol level (BAL) of 0.05 per cent, which is the legal limit in many European countries.   In the early 2000s, Australian researchers confirmed that 17 to 19 hours of no-sleep lead to a performance as bad as a BAL of 0.05 per cent. They also showed that 28 hours of sleep deprivation caused truck drivers to perform as badly as a BAL of 0.10 per cent, well above the legal limit in most countries. (In Singapore, this is a BAL of 0.08 per cent.)   Thus driving when extremely sleep deprived is like driving under the influence of alcohol, which is undoubtedly a grossly negligent act. Indeed, since 2003, Britain has amended its law to make drowsy driving a crime as serious as drink driving.   A lower court in Singapore had merely fined Hue the maximum $10,000 and banned her from driving for five years.   In its appeal, the prosecution wanted her jailed for "gross negligence" for driving when she had not slept in 24 hours. The appeals court agreed, and sentenced her to four weeks in prison.   While this court decision is to be applauded, there is a risk that it may have set an arbitrary 24-hour no-sleep standard as the precedent for ascertaining if a drowsy driver is grossly negligent. Coincidentally, the state of New Jersey in the US has, since 2003, put in place a law where drivers who have been without sleep for at least 24 hours (but not less) who commit vehicular homicide can be jailed for 10 years and fined US$100,000 (S$125,000).   Indeed, the 24 hour cut-off point may come to be given inordinate weight as a precedent in drowsy driving cases in the future. This is because it is the only clear-cut factor that points to gross negligence - apart from the driver confessing to having fallen asleep at the wheel, or unless there is incontrovertible video capture of him dozing off.   If the lower courts in Singapore were to follow this precedent too closely in future cases, many cases of gross negligence in drowsy driving will not be caught.   First, will the 24-hour threshold apply only if there is a fatality? If Mr Mahalingam had survived, would Hue have been jailed at all? If the precedent is strictly applied only when there is a fatality, then drowsy drivers who cause very serious accidents without fatalities may get away with just a fine even in cases where the victim is paralysed, brain damaged, or seriously injured in other ways.   Second, if "gross negligence" requires the driver to have been awake for 24 hours continuously, the new precedent may be hard to apply. What if the driver had had a few cat naps for a total of, say, six hours of sleep in the 36 hours leading up to the accident in question? Or a motorist who had slept for only two hours in the last 24 hours? Or one who had slept for 12 hours straight just before he then went without sleep for 24 continuous hours?   Third, there is unfortunately no blood test that can quantify one's drowsiness level. Knowing that their drowsiness cannot be quantified, unlike blood alcohol levels, this precedent itself may come to motivate errant drivers to claim that they had indeed slept for more than a few hours the night before.   They might then claim that they had swerved to avoid a reckless motorcyclist instead, for example. Perhaps circumstantial evidence may still suggest he was driving sleep-deprived. But without a confession or clear video evidence, such circumstantial evidence may not be enough to convict. Remember that the standard of proof must be "beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case.   CJ Menon remarked: "It is important to signal to other drivers that they must be mindful of the terrible risks they take upon themselves and other road users when they drive when not fit to do so." It is not obvious, however, that this new prospect of jail time will change such driver behaviour. After all, every motorist should be deterred by the prospect of being killed if they drive sleep-deprived. Yet some do so anyway, so it may be more of a lack of awareness of the gravity of the situation than the prospect of jail time or the possibility of hospitalisation.   What to do?   To more effectively deter drowsy driving, the threat of prison time must be supplemented with campaigns to educate the public about the dangers of driving when one is sleep-deprived.   -- ST FILE PHOTO   by Andy Ho