Jump to content

Chris Harris thinks McLaren 600LT is more fun than Senna

Chris Harris thinks McLaren 600LT is more fun than Senna

Sign in to follow this  



blogentry-133713-0-80858800-1550295223_thumb.jpgChris Harris is back with a new video. This time round, he drives the new McLaren 600LT at the Circuit de Charade in France.


Based on the baby series of its range of cars, the 600LT is a reworked version of the 570S and is also the company’s smallest model to wear the Long Tail badge.


Using conventional springs unlike its more expensive and advanced 720S brother, Harris says that this allows him to feel more connected to the car and easier to extract the most out of it.


Watch the video and see what else make him like the 600LT over much more extreme Senna.



Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    BMW Alpina B5: Comfortable Cruiser

    Who says performance cars need to come with a sporty ride? Last week we tested the BMW Alpina B5 to see if Alpina's take on the performance saloon is a viable alternative to the BMW M5. So what sets this Alpina apart? Firstly, the interior has received a host of luxurious touches to set it apart from the regular 5 series: The digital dashboard in the B5 has its own Alpina-specific design and colour scheme, for example, while the handcrafted Alpina steering wheel is made of Lavalina leather (the same leather used in Rolls-Royce cars), and features blue/green stitching. But what truly sets this car apart from the rest of the performance saloon pack is what is underneath you: With a suspension designed to deliver comfort and refinement in spades, the Alpina is not just comfortable, but sublimely comfortable. Adding to the comfortable cruise is the fact that the B5 is joyously easy-going to drive, with the lightest of pressure on the accelerator sending the car wafting rapidly down the road. With the abundance of humps and rumble strips on our local roads, would Alpina's take on the performance saloon, with its effortless and classy character, be a better suit for your everyday commute? Read our full review here!



    Meet the most powerful 911 ever: the new 2017 Porsche 911 GT2 RS

    Just when you thought the most extreme 911s couldn't get much faster, along comes Porsche with a 700 horsepower machine.   The excess-all-areas sports car was unveiled at the 2017 Goodwood Festival of Speed by works endurance and former F1 driver Mark Webber.   The specs are pretty heady for the most focused 911 yet. In case that (metric) horsepower figure didn't tell you all you need to know, this is the most powerful roadgoing 911 of all time; no wonder it'll dispatch the century-sprint in a torso-crushing 2.8 seconds....   Key spec figures for the GT2 are:   Engine: 3.8-litre twin-turbo flat-six Power: 700hp, or 690bhp Torque: 553lb ft 0-100km/h: 2.8sec Top speed: 339km/h Kerb weight 1470kg     It's dripping with special touches: the exhaust is made from ultra-lightweight titanium, to chop 7kg from the bulk of a 911 Turbo's breathing apparatus; four-wheel steering features for added agility; and there's a smattering of carbonfibre to chop weight down to 1470kg.   You can tell the new 911 GT2 RS is an extreme race car for the road, rather like its predecessor; the huge vents in the bumper and front wings, massive brake calipers and rear wing make sure of that. Dan Greenawalt from Turn10 said the GT2 RS ‘features the most powerful roadgoing 911 engine ever made.’



    Local supercars sleep with the fishes on Sunday

    The supercar community in Singapore is a pretty active one and if you don't see groups of them parked together at some hotel, they're probably either in Sentosa or they've gone on their 'rounding' tour of the island.   Unfortunately though, Sunday wasn't exactly what most would call typical.   Heavy rains in the early morning caused flash floods that saw areas of Singapore, particularly the Bukit Timah area of the island, being submerged for most of the day.   So while normal cars like Toyota Vios's were carefully threading through the water, can you imagine what chance the supercar's would have had?   Stomp has a picture of a Maserati GranTurismo stranded in the waters off Orchard road and probably the most disturbing of the lot of pictures and videos being covered in the online blog sphere and on tv can be found on our very own My Car Forum!   Posted by one Mockngbrd, the pictures were taken in the undergound parking spaces of the St.Regis hotel.   Here's a link to the forum post.   For the benefit of those who are unable to see the pictures, the series of photos start with a one showing just how deep the flood water came benchmarked by a parked BMW X5 and the lift loby.   It then goes on to a kermit the frog green Porsche GT3 RS, then to a 'normal' Audi TT coupe with a glimpse of a vibrant shade of yellow and green at the corner of the same picture.   Both shades belong to two supercars parked next to each other which the next picture clearly shows.   One is the Lamborghini's Gallardo LP570-4 Superleggera - a lightweight and more powerful edition of the Gallardo model. The other is the brand-new Ferrari 458 with a Novitec kit, believed to be the only one in Singapore right now.   The remaining two pictures show a limited edition Aston Martin Vantage V12 with the bonnet up and a random pick of luxury limo's from a Roll's to a BMW 7.



    Switch in model frees operators to focus on service

    AFTER four decades of relying on the profit motive to ensure buses are run efficiently and, in turn, keep public spending in check, Singapore has admitted that a model change is due.   The Government will now implement a contracting model, where operators bid for the right to operate routes in a competitive tendering system.   Tenders will be awarded based on, among other things, the competitiveness of a bid and the track record of the bidder.   Having secured a contract, operators will be released from the tension of having to balance revenue and service standards - something which they have been trying to do in the last 40 years or so.   They will also be freed from having to acquire and hold on to operating assets which translate into hefty depreciation charges on their profit-and- loss accounts.   The Government will own all infrastructural and operating assets.   Operators will thus be able to focus on meeting service standards, which the regulator - in this case, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) - monitors periodically.   Those who meet or exceed standards will be rewarded with bonuses. Those who fall short forgo bonuses and, in severe cases, risk not being able to take part in future contracts.   Such a system has proven to be successful in several cities, including London, Sydney and Copenhagen.   The question is, how well will it work in Singapore?   In principle, it is a superior system. For one thing, it facilitates price discovery, where the true cost of providing a service is arrived at via competition.   For another, it allows government subsidies to be disbursed more elegantly. The billion-dollar Bus Service Enhancement Programme - where the Government pays for a fleet of buses and their running cost for 10 years - for instance, has been criticised as an indirect subsidy for the operators. It is, in fact, a subsidy for commuters. In a contracting regime, there will be less ambiguity.   Moving to the contracting model will also mean that Singapore will at last harmonise the way it finances its buses and trains. Up till now, the rail system has received more support, ostensibly because of its huge capital outlay.   Most importantly, a contracting regime will allow the Government to have more say and control over service standards, simply because the state will now pay the operators for their services. And because it is paying, the state now has a more direct interest in getting desired outcomes.   Previously, it was difficult for the Government to push for higher standards in the face of declining bus profits and, in some instances, outright losses. That was why it had to roll out the Bus Service Enhancement Programme.   So, contracting is a better system. But it may not be a more cost-efficient one, as similar systems have demonstrated.   In London, bus subsidies grew from £41 million (S$86.5 million) - 6.5 per cent of the cost of contracts awarded - in 1999/2000 to £653 million (40 per cent of the contracts' cost) in 2007/2008.   According to a study done by KPMG, the reason for this was that costs rose faster than fare revenue, which the government collects and keeps.   In Singapore, The Straits Times understands that City Direct services, which conform to the contracting model, have been running with hefty subsidies.   According to insiders, the LTA has been able to recover only 50 per cent to 60 per cent of the contract cost through fare collection.   The simple solution would be to increase fares. But the pressure to keep fares affordable will remain in the new model. In fact, the pressure may be greater.   In London, for instance, bus fares in real terms have been sliding steadily since the contracting system was adopted in the mid-1980s. And even though Transport for London (the LTA equivalent) has the mandate to increase fares annually via a fixed inflation-plus formula, adjustments are not always carried out to the letter, according to KPMG.   In Singapore, it is still unclear how bus fares will be adjusted. Transport operators should no longer be the ones applying for a fare hike, since their earnings are not affected by fares. Their income will be from the contract sum, service standard bonuses and operating efficiency.   It would be strange if they carry on the practice of applying for fare adjustments. But it would be doubly strange for the Government to apply to the Public Transport Council - which it appoints - for fare revisions.   Whichever way, it is clear that subsidies will be central to the contracting regime. From a public policy perspective, using tax dollars to defray the cost of public transport - a common practice worldwide - is sound. It makes sense in the big picture too, especially to a small country like Singapore, which cannot accommodate widespread car ownership.   But how big a bang it gets for the buck - especially in terms of improved service - depends much on how well the new model is implemented.   by Christopher Tan