Jump to content

Cyclist thinks he has the right of way, but netizens flame him

Cyclist thinks he has the right of way, but netizens flame him

chitchatboy

7,239 views

Now this will probably open up a can of worms or two. Who do you reckon is in the wrong? The cyclist or the driver of the Audi?

ezgif.com-optimize.gif.1928fcc5552cd4ede738b7aeeb108803.gif

Filmed by the cyclist on 5th of July along mandai road, a white Audi A1 could be seen pulling out of a small lane and into the path of a cyclist who was doing less than 30km/h on his bike.

According to the source SG Road Vigilante, the guys there reckoned the car did not notice or did not care about the cyclist, barely cutting him off.

2.jpg.090db5299368f0b8201d056aee8f6853.jpg

1.jpg.60fac47be08206b89b4140d8a99a80be.jpg

What do you guys think? 

Was it a close call or an error on the part of the Audi driver? Or was this a simple case of the cyclist letting his ego take control of him and not riding defensively for his own safety?

Let us know in the comments below!

 



34 Comments


Recommended Comments



Heartbreakid

(edited)

Some cyclists have no respect for other road users and often think that they have the right of way and other road users got to drive around them. Without any common sense, they put themselves at a dangerous spot yet they fail to know it other than being ego.

Edited by Heartbreakid
  • Praise 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Nothing wrong with the Audi's driving. The MAMIL two wheel idiot needs to check his privilege.

  • Praise 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 minute ago, Turboflat4 said:

Nothing wrong with the Audi's driving. The MAMIL two wheel idiot needs to check his privilege.

Based on traffic rule, could Audi do that?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Turboflat4

(edited)

5 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

Based on traffic rule, could Audi do that?

The Audi could still have overtaken the biker (legally) if he'd filtered in behind him. But the way he did it here was safer for all parties (maximised visibility, minimised time and space) so he was actually being considerate toward the exposed human on the two wheeler. 

For me, practical safety always trumps blindly following rules.

Edited by Turboflat4
  • Praise 2

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 minute ago, Turboflat4 said:

The Audi could still have overtaken the biker if he'd filtered in behind him. But the way he did it here was safer for all parties (maximised visibility, minimised time and space) so he was actually being considerate toward the exposed meat-bag on the two wheeler. 

For me, practical safety always trumps blindly following rules.

The stretch of Mandai Road is very narrow.  Bus usually fill up the entire lane.

What he did would force oncoming vehicle to stop.

The safer way is to overtake the bike from behind.  Anyway, the distance to junction is no more than 1km.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Turboflat4

(edited)

3 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

The stretch of Mandai Road is very narrow.  Bus usually fill up the entire lane.

What he did would force oncoming vehicle to stop.

The safer way is to overtake the bike from behind.  Anyway, the distance to junction is no more than 1km.

Audi should, if anything, have done it even more quickly (bike shouldn't have needed to slow down even). I disagree that overtaking from behind is safer, especially when we consider the time, distance and visibility factors I've mentioned. 

Oh well, goes to show we can agree on most issues, the most important political ones - but still disagree on this one thing. C'est la vie and cheers. 😁

Edited by Turboflat4
  • Haha! 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Turboflat4 said:

Audi should, if anything, have done it even more quickly (bike shouldn't have needed to slow down even). I disagree that overtaking from behind is safer, especially when we consider the time, distance and visibility factors I've mentioned. 

Oh well, goes to show we can agree on most issues, the most important political ones - but still disagree on this one thing. C'est la vie and cheers. 😁

Forgot to add, at least people will now be sure @inlinesix and I are not clone accounts. 😂😂😂

  • Haha! 2

Share this comment


Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Turboflat4 said:

Audi should, if anything, have done it even more quickly (bike shouldn't have needed to slow down even). I disagree that overtaking from behind is safer, especially when we consider the time, distance and visibility factors I've mentioned. 

Oh well, goes to show we can agree on most issues, the most important political ones - but still disagree on this one thing. C'est la vie and cheers. 😁

Well, i agree with "done it even more quickly (bike shouldn't have needed to slow down even)."

  • Praise 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Turboflat4 said:

Forgot to add, at least people will now be sure @inlinesix and I are not clone accounts. 😂😂😂

If not really is kaki gong kaki song. Left hand talk to right hand.

  • Haha! 2

Share this comment


Link to comment
9 minutes ago, BabyBlade said:

If not really is kaki gong kaki song. Left hand talk to right hand.

Correct terminology is ownself praise ownself. 

Must follow gahmen ISO standard phrasing mah. 😂

  • Haha! 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

is it legal for cyclist to cycling on the road ?

Share this comment


Link to comment
35 minutes ago, Kendra said:

is it legal for cyclist to cycling on the road ?

Under road traffic act, bicycle is a vehicle similar to car.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Driver and cyclist both have that self entitlement mindset of they are in the right. So how?

We dont need to guess hard who will suffer the most in the event of an accident. The cyclist will suffer physical injuries and may die from it. The car will suffer some scratches maybe but the insurance payout to the cyclist may be high. So to put it plainly the driver's pocket will suffer.

This is what I think. Some cyclists are idiots.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Cyclist no need to occupy entire road width, just ride on the side will do. I observed a number of cyclists cycle on the roads, with some driving abreast on one lane during morning peak hours. If this the case, I feel there should be separate path for bicycle to prevent accidents and conflicts.

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 hour ago, Watwheels said:

Driver and cyclist both have that self entitlement mindset of they are in the right. So how?

We dont need to guess hard who will suffer the most in the event of an accident. The cyclist will suffer physical injuries and may die from it. The car will suffer some scratches maybe but the insurance payout to the cyclist may be high. So to put it plainly the driver's pocket will suffer.

This is what I think. Some cyclists are idiots.

 

Audi is wrong to have cut the cyclist path but cyclist is wrong to think that he is invincible. If any, a cyclist would likely  be missed by driver unintentionally,   like he is invisible. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

All the bicycle rider should pay road tax and erp as well since they feel entitled to use the road. 

  • Praise 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

The cyclist was going way too fast and was almost on the centre of the lane. He should be keeping closer to the left, in which case no issue with the Audi driving into the lane.

Share this comment


Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Nav14 said:

The cyclist was going way too fast and was almost on the centre of the lane. He should be keeping closer to the left, in which case no issue with the Audi driving into the lane.

What's the speed limit on that road?

Share this comment


Link to comment
29 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

What's the speed limit on that road?

Should be 50 but cyclists should not treat themselves as motor vehicles. Unless they do not value their lives in which case no need to complain.

And if they do consider themselves equal to motor vehicles in speed limits and rights, then should contribute to road tax.

Share this comment


Link to comment
6 hours ago, Nav14 said:

Should be 50 but cyclists should not treat themselves as motor vehicles. Unless they do not value their lives in which case no need to complain.

And if they do consider themselves equal to motor vehicles in speed limits and rights, then should contribute to road tax.

those cyclist who feels entitled to use the road should pay road tax for their bicycles.

Like that cyclist can help alleviate the 100 billion govt spend. Also contribute to the society

Share this comment


Link to comment

Audi should have treated the cyclist as a vehicle..

If it was a vehicle, would the audi have turned out? Maybe, because its self entitled..

Share this comment


Link to comment

The Audi should have waited the cyclist to pass being turning from a minor road. He can overtake the cyclist at a later part along mandai. I would think since the cyclist is doing less than 30km/hr (speed indicator), the Audi thought he could drive faster and took the turn. Sometimes, we need to exercise defensive driving or cycling (give way) behaviour under this circumstances.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Rickster

(edited)

It's all about civic mindedness in this scenario.

From a legal standpoint, the Audi can be considered dangerous driving because he caused another road user to slow down/take evasive action. If during driving exam, the Audi sure immediate failure.

This is just like those road hoggers on lane 1 travelling at the speed limit of 80/90 even though they are just a hair faster than the middle lane. They r not breaking any laws, but they no civic mindedness. The hogger and can be sure all those driving behind r sending their regards to his/her ancestors.

Edited by Rickster
  • Praise 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

I am surprise by the volume of subjects that can be raised in an open n shut case of basic road regulation. A bicycle on the road is a vehicle (paying road tax or not does not change that). All road regulations apply to it as per any other vehicle. The cyclist does not “think” he has the right of way. He HAS the right of way. 
it is strange that some can advocate civic mindedness to the cyclist yet blatantly ignore the fact that the Audi driver puts the cyclist at risk of bodily harm by ignoring a simple traffic rule.

How the Audi overtakes, if he choose to do so, is another subject matter altogether. If overtaking cannot be done safely, then don’t. We all learn that in driving school.

If we change the bicycle to a slow moving motorcycle or heavy vehicle, that will not make any difference to the application of road regulation in this case. Audi gives way to vehicle going straight. 
Yes, the cyclist will suffer a lot more physcially in the event of an accident. That will place a higher duty of care on cars to look out and give way to more vulnerable road users.

 

 

  • Praise 3

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hate when cyclist cycle on the road. They never pay road tax want to ride on the road. Lj ah 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Not sure how to parallel park? Here's a guide if you need a refresher

    If you find parallel parking challenging, here's a step by step guide to refresh yourself if you feel like overcoming your fears. Seen on ROADS.sg and contributed by Syed Al-Qudree,  this very comprehensive guide even though some might argue that it is not easy to judge the distance between the front car and yours when you are pre-positioning in Step 1. Do you think the guide is helpful? 
    Let us know in the comments below!

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    Have you ever been so mad you gave a camera the middle finger?

    In our fast-paced and hectic society, it is easy to get triggered when unexpected things happen to you as we can see from this video that has been posted on SG Road Vigilante. In this video that was shot in Yishun a few days back, we can see a van which is the camera vehicle, coming to the rear of a Volkswagen Scirocco. While waiting for the gantry to be lifted, the car rolled back as one pair of its wheels were on a hump. The van driver gave the car a tap of its horn, triggering the Scirocco driver to come down and confront the van driver. For those who have no experience with dual-clutch gearboxes, some, if not most, have the tendency to roll back if the car is on a slope as the car behaves very much like a manual car in start-stop situations. Hence, the Scirocco driver wasn't trying to reverse on purpose.  Was the horn necessary? Was it necessary to follow so close to the Scirocco seeing that he had trouble at the gantry? And was the van driver guilty of tailgating out of the carpark? Or was it simply just a case of an ill-mannered Volkswagen driver having a bad day? What do you guys reckon? Let us know in the comment box!
     

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    Netizens dig out black Golf GTI driver's former antics

    Remember the black Volkswagen mk5 Golf GTI that was spotted racing on CTE at night with an Mitsubishi Evo X before causing a van to crash and flip? Here's a recent cum compilation video of the GTI causing havoc on our roads. As you guys can see these are some pretty reckless driving. A big no-no when dashcams are everywhere. And yes how could we forget the ever-increasing number of Facebook pages that shame bad drivers. Naturally, the comments section on SG Road Vigilante's page has its supporters slamming the driver. On a less serious note, the GTI is a pretty good point and shoot car with its fast-acting DSG box and turbo engine eh?   

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

    Traffic dispute convinces many that cyclists are getting out of hand

    Are cyclists getting out of hand these days?  We'd say so as more and more videos of cyclists ignoring traffic rules and getting angry with other road users have been surfacing. It doesn't help as COVID has encouraged more people to workout, with cycling fast becoming one of the more popular choices/excuses to get out of the house. According to SG Road Vigilante, this incident between 2 cyclists and the camera car happened on 30th August 2020 at 17:15 along east coast road. As the road is a single lane road, SGRV claims that the camera car wanted to overtake and horned at the cyclists that he/she is proceeding with an overtaking maneuver. Unfortunately, the cyclist wasn't happy and started some 'ah-beng taunting' actions. Do you think the cyclists in the videos are self-entitled? Or do you reckon the driver should have just queued up and drove slowly behind them? Let us know!    

    chitchatboy

    chitchatboy

×