Jump to content

Newly recommended road cycling rules — Do they actually matter?

Newly recommended road cycling rules — Do they actually matter?

thatJDMahboy

6,974 views

The Review

On 1 October 2021, a government panel, Active Mobility Advisory Panel (AMAP), has produced a set of recommendations to review regulations to enhance road safety.  

The recommendations consist of the following rules and guidelines: 

  1. To continue allowing cyclists to ride abreast in a maximum of 2 on roads with two or more lanes. 
  2. Introduce a rule for on-road cycling groups, for them to limit their group length to 5 bicycles. Essentially, this means a limit of five cyclists in a single file or ten cyclists when riding abreast.  
  3. Introduce a guideline to ensure a safe distance of 2 lamp posts (30 metres) between riding groups. 
  4. Introduce a guideline in the Highway Code and driving test handbooks that require motorists to have a minimum passing distance of 1.5 metres when passing cyclists.  
  5. Highly encourage cyclists to sign up for third-party liability insurance. When involved in an accident, third-party insurance will compensate for victims and protect cyclists from potentially expensive claims. 

Source: https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/dam/ltagov/getting_around/active_mobility/rules_public_education/rules_code_of_conduct/pdf/2021-10_amap_report_for_the_review_of_on-road_safety.pdf

My Two Cents

After reading the recommended rules and guidelines, certain thoughts came to my mind: 

For recommendations 1 – 3, is there a point behind it? After all, what is the point if cyclists don’t adhere to these recommendations? Unless they are caught in the act of flouting these rules and guidelines, matters will remain the status quo. Besides, recommendations 1 – 3 will only be effective when proper enforcement is present. And this, unfortunately, is a hard nut to crack.  

Recommendation 4 will be only and most effective when implemented – but why? Well, it is pretty simple. It is easier to take enforcement actions against motorists than cyclists, as motorists must be licensed and officially registered with government bodies. Hence, it makes motorists more accountable for any actions committed by them.  

Lastly, recommendation 5 is the most perplexing recommendation of them all. 

Quote

“A 2017 Life Insurance Association survey1 found that 41.4 percent of Singaporeans and  Permanent Residents (PRs) aged 20 to 34 have no insurance coverage. “ 

Source: https://www.uob.com.sg/personal/wealth/content-hub/insure/are-you-protected-bridging-the-protection-gap-in-singapore.html

Considering a significant number of citizens have no insurance coverage, the tendency to take up third-party liability insurance for cycling is going to be pretty damn low too.

Conclusion  

Nothing spells ineffectiveness more than this proposed set of recommendations, which practically solves none of the issues at hand. Instead, the proposed recommendation aims to tackle every other matter, except that one crucial matter – Holding cyclists accountable for their actions. 

Netizens' Comments

image.png.117347fffa1ea7d76f446f4a3b324053.png

image.png.063b2376d18686595cc83d873aeaf1a4.png

image.png.4356ae5a3ec1b7b13315cbc1489f8b75.png

image.png.2d67cdbd8b005e9bda2a96b37a8be872.png

This basically summarises all the issues at hand.

 

 

---

Thinking of selling your car? sgCarMart Quotz guarantees the highest selling price for your car. We’ll even give you $100 cash if you find a better offer elsewhere! Get a free quote to find out how much your car is worth today!



5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Problem here is. We have many rules and also many people (cyclist) challenging it. Because we have no proper or lack of enforcement to act on the rules.

In addition, it is a monkey see monkey do act and also "catch me if you can" mentality because they know they can get away with it untrace.

Edited by Heartbreakid
  • Praise 3

Share this comment


Link to comment
Quote

Problem here is. We have many rules and also many people (cyclist) challenging it. Because we have no proper or lack of enforcement to act on the rules.

In addition, it is a monkey see monkey do act and also "catch me if you can" mentality because they know they can get away with it untrace.

Well said, totally my point! The panel have to tackle the root cause of the problem – Enforcement and Accountability, not the other matters surrounding the cycling issue. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

the authorities fail miserably in lots of these cases.

they always introduce knee jerk regulations and laws and is, like metioned above, miising the root cause.

they should take the LKY style, hit them hard where it hurts.

take drink driving and dangerous driving, like running red lights, jail the buggers and ban them for at least 5 years and see whether they learn or not.

e-bikes, PMDs and cyclists, if they just punish a few of them jialat jialat then the rest will surely fall in line.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

IMHO.
There may come a day where many groups of 10 cyclists will just cycle during peak hours on a busy road for awareness. Because they can.

Share this comment


Link to comment

All talk only...govt don't dare to take concrete actions...otherwise it is like slapping their own face for asking ppl to go green and some last mile thing. 

Guidelines are only guidelines...must show penalty for such offences and den catch a few every month. Den everyone will fall in line. 

Since don't want to register bike... Den get cyclist on the road to display their NRIC visibly on the back of their bike loh... Evidence can be collected by motorist cams. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Mitsubishi Evo 10 performs a timely pop and bang which literally smoked a salty cam car driver

    In the public's eyes, most often confuse/label Japanese sports cars as an 'Ah beng' car or an ordinary car that has been 'zhng-ed'. In Singapore, it is common for these cars to get hated by the public. Here's one such example: What Happened? In a user-submitted video, the driver/passenger of the cam car can be heard making some remarks about the blue Mitsubishi Evolution X in front of it. The remarks included a sarcastic attempt to mimic the Evo X's noise. Moments later, as the Evo X enters an expressway, it performs a quick launch, resulting in pops and bangs. Thick black smoke and flames could also be seen shooting out of its exhaust.  I must say that the 'smokescreen' was a rather timely response to the complaints coming from the cam car.  Illegally Modified? This might be the first question that pops into your mind for the uninitiated. However, the black smoke, flames, pops and bangs produced from the Mitsubishi Evolution X are due to the anti-lag system installed in the car.  Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the Mitsubishi Evolution X was illegally modified. However, there is still a chance that the car is 'illegally modified' if LTA thoroughly inspects the car.  For all you know, it could be labelled as 'illegally modified' due to heavily tinted windows.  Netizens' Comments Must be because cam car's first time experiencing pops and bangs.  NGL, Evo X is a nice car😍 Every day we learn something new.      ======== Receive a $10 PayNow for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️https://bit.ly/3c6JERA

    thatJDMahboy

    thatJDMahboy

    Watch how this cam car gets scolded for not giving way in the most Singaporean way possible

    They say that Singaporeans have a unique culture and identity, which can be attributed to our variety of local cuisines and our multi-racial society.  I say we are truly unique by the manner we talk.  Watch this video to see the most Singaporean style argument between two motorists: What Happened? This pointless incident occurred at an unknown HDB carpark involving the cam car and a blacked-out van. The cam car was driving towards the end of a one-way direction carpark, where the driver was supposed to give way to oncoming vehicles before "re-entering" the carpark again.  Just as the cam car was about to turn right, a blacked-out van emerged from the carpark entrance. As a result, the cam car performed an e-brake and exclaimed 'SMLJ?' before venting his frustration by honking at the van.  The van driver then proceeded to stop in front of the cam car before opening the driver's side door. The van driver then made a gesture to ask why he was honked. The argument between both parties went as such: NGL, this encounter is about the most Singaporean it will ever get! An Avoidable Exchange TBH, the honking action of the cam car was genuinely uncalled for.  I see it as an intentional provocation to spite the van driver and vent his frustrations after the cam car was forced to give way to the van.  What do you think? Which party do you think is at fault? Netizens' Comments Dude, what have you been smoking when you were typing Point 3 onwards? That stuff is way too strong. The comment that I've been looking for💯 Fiercest Hiace in SG with heavily tinted windows and rear spoiler - LTA's favourite van!     ======== Receive a $10 PayNow for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️https://bit.ly/3c6JERA

    thatJDMahboy

    thatJDMahboy

    Good afternoon Singapore! If you’re in a van and fancy a quickie, maybe go to the back of the van first?

    TL:DR – A man and a woman engage in an act that requires head bobbing (and tissue) in the driver seat of a van. In broad daylight. For the whole world to see.   Remember that whole incident about the couple testing the Volkwagen Golf suspension last year? We have a new 2022 version with a different couple, different vehicle but not as vigorous compared to last year’s incident. Watch the 34-second video here   Skills +10000? We do not know how long the lady in the video had been bobbing her head prior to this video. What we do know is that just a mere 7-seconds into the video and the deed is done. Out comes some tissue to clean her hands, her mouth and her partner’s lower region. Is that a public display of some mad skills? Or maybe the man has been cursed with premature…. Why do it in the open when you have a van? There’s a whole closed off compartment at the back of the van where they would have had more discretion. But I guess discretion wasn’t what they were going for. Online Chatter I’m loving some of the comments. People are trying to make up funny excuses as to what the couple were doing. 🔼THIS ONE MADE ME LAUGH OUT LOUD!🔼 Wah. That’s nasty.   ======== Receive a $10 PayNow for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️https://bit.ly/3c6JERA  

    jameskarlchan

    jameskarlchan

    Drivers cause a chain collision along the PIE after slowing down to avoid getting caught by the TP

    I’m sure there are many people who drive a ‘little’ over the speed limit on expressways, especially if traffic conditions are clear. After all, what's the harm in speeding it up a little? However, this mentality bites us in the butt when unforeseen circumstances occur – such as the sudden appearance of TP officers. These drivers show us why it’s crucial to pay close attention and keep to the speed limit while driving on the expressway. The video starts with the cam car travelling on the PIE along Steven Road. Right behind him, several drivers on the inner lane casually cruise by. Just as the cam car merges into the left lane, the driver notices two groups of TP officers on the left road shoulder of the expressway. The first group of officers attended to a stationary car on the road shoulder, while the second group were parked further down. The sudden appearance of these TP officers startles the drivers on the inner lane, leading them to hit the brakes and slow down to avoid getting fined for speeding. This, however, proves to be futile as the drivers fail to notice a stationary white Mercedes taxi in front of them, resulting in a massive chain collision. It is unclear if the taxi suddenly braked because of the TP officers or whether it was already involved in an accident prior. If only the drivers had paid more attention to the road, they would have saved their vehicles and wallets from an expensive repair job. Netizens’ reactions Yep, if these drivers did nothing wrong and were sticking to the speed limit, they wouldn't be in such a hurry to slow down. Everyone else watching this video be like:      ======== Receive a $10 PayNow for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️ https://bit.ly/3c6JERA    

    unicornfloof

    unicornfloof

×