Jump to content

$500,000 GTR with $4000+ worth of parking fines tries to escape $6.52 parking fee

$500,000 GTR with $4000+ worth of parking fines tries to escape $6.52 parking fee

jameskarlchan

49,641 views

TL:DR – The title says it all. The owner claims that he ended up paying the $6.52 in the end, and the accumulated fines were due to the inability to navigate slopes at the MSCP because of the GTR’s lowered stance.

 

When you drive an eye-catching car like a Nissan GTR, you’d better be on your best behaviour on the roads. There are digital eyes everywhere!

Trying to escape paying carpark fees is not an example of ‘best behaviour’.

Here’s the video for a weekend laugh.

 

Updates on SGRV

While normal tailgating out of carpark videos can be mundane, this update piqued my interest.

image.png.fc24d9a2155f5b35260a34514e6169aa.png

The fines

Let’s have a look at the fines.

image.png.b5b9e5ab7213e2746dcef27bc192bf65.png

 

image.thumb.png.681cbec4b50b7a0021cba8a06318d4f4.png

image.thumb.png.71646e80751bf803f7f26c945a14039f.png

image.thumb.png.dd91466cdb2753b36cbeb30edd5987cb.png

HOW IN THE WORLD DOES ONE RACK UP SUCH AN INSANE AMOUNT OF PARKING FINES?

giphy.gif

The whole argument that “Home MSCP too steep” is also somewhat weak.

Park at an open-air carpark maybe?

Does this car look familiar?

So, we did some searching for GTRs on sgCarMart like we do every day (just to drool over things we cannot afford) and we found this:

image.png.843feb591de5906fa195db4c35c916b0.png

Compare that with the GTR in the video. I'm sorry this was the best shot we could get.... it's lowered after all.

image.png.6de4ce0fd153ddecdc9f747982705dc9.png

Do you think the hood vents on the body kits look somewhat similar?

If they are the one and the same, that’s defnitely a creative way to ‘siam’ the $4000+ parking fines.

Online Chatter

image.png.28eacc5bdb746a72377b550f7774cf59.png

Zero logic. Absolutely zero.

image.png.aa24e466d75a281aab43ef2dfc2bed92.png

Well, to be fair, he sent an image of the payment

image.png.e1ed67103f0a133fd950bd8d0a01b9f8.png

image.png.d5962ff98fa2a28bf3565bd5124dbeac.png

image.png.447a6cdafeff29d271d7838c1595981d.png

 

 

========

Receive a $10 PayNow transfer for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us  https://bit.ly/3c6JERA

 

 



5 Comments


Recommended Comments

$500,000 for this COE GTR.?Maybe already 4-5 Owners liao.

  • Haha! 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

drive GTR .... if cannot go up HDB MSCP  ... is HDB fault? [hur] 

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 12/4/2021 at 12:59 PM, PM250 said:

no money want to drive GTR. 

face face lah....want to look good in front of friends... A HIGH CLASS car slave. 

If the other low class car slave eat Maggie fee only for dinner, This driver probably eat one pack of Maggie mee for 5 days 😁

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Featured Stories

    Honda Odyssey driver and taxi uncle stops in the middle of the road to exchange a series of glorious expletives

    There is a saying that goes like this: "If you are not angry when you drive, you are the one making others angry." It is true to a certain extent, except that it is more towards being annoyed than being angry. However, for this particular taxi driver, he may have taken that quote a bit too far.  Watch the video below to see how he expresses his anger towards a fellow motorist: Warning: The following video features plenty of Hokkien vulgarities, voice cracking and inaudible shouting. Watch it at your own risk! What Happened? The incident occurred along Jalan Sultan.  Apparently, the Honda Odyssey driver cut from the extreme left to the extreme right lane (taxi driver's lane) without checking and almost caused an accident.  The Honda driver's behaviour angered the taxi driver, which prompted the taxi driver to honk him.  Unhappy at being honked at, the Honda driver stopped in the middle of the road, impeding the path of the taxi driver.  Subsequently, both drivers alighted from their cars, and they began to exchange a series of glorious expletives.  Below is a brief and translated version of their confrontation:  A Mere Coincidence? IMO, the taxi driver ain't no angel either.  It feels as if he was out to pick a fight with the Honda Odyssey driver for cutting into his lane.  And somehow, there wasn't any footage of the Honda driver performing what the taxi driver claimed he did.  That's a bit too coincidental, isn't it? Netizens' Comments Seems like the taxi driver was seizing the opportunity to vent his frustration on the Honda Odyssey driver. Sorry, I snickered at this comment. @Honda Odyssey driver Pls upload your dashcam footage.     ======== Receive a $10 PayNow for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️https://bit.ly/3c6JERA  

    thatJDMahboy

    thatJDMahboy

    Stupid or ignorant? Mercedes driver films himself speeding and post it online for the world to see

    Not gonna lie; Mercedes does have some sick, sporty-looking instrument clusters in their cars. But don't get me wrong, driving a Mercedes Coupe with a sporty-looking instrument cluster is not equivalent to driving a sports car. Watch this video to find out what I mean by that:  What Happened This 15-second video seemed to be originally posted on the Mercedes driver's Instagram story. In the video, the driver performs a "launch control" upon the traffic light turning green.  With all the fancy instrument clusters of his car, you would assume that he is driving a Mercedes sports car. But here is the anti-climatic part: It took the driver exactly 11 seconds to get from 0-101km/h. (That is equivalent to a Honda Civic's 0-100km/h timing) I mean, a Honda Vezel Hybrid could probably outrun his Mercedes C180 Coupe in a 0 to 100km/h race EFFORTLESSLY. But do you see Honda Vezel drivers taking video of themselves "launching" their cars? NOPE.  Before the video ended, the driver could be seen hitting a speed of 118km/h.  License Kantong Already Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and assume the speed limit of that stretch of road is 70km/h; the driver still exceeded the speed limit by 48km/h. Also, don't forget the driver's usage of his mobile phone to capture this priceless moment.  According to the Road Traffic Act, exceeding the vehicular speed limit by 41 to 50km/h will result in 12 demerit points and prosecution in court.  Furthermore, using a mobile device while driving will result in 12 demerit points and a fine not exceeding $1,000 or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both (1st-time offenders).  Well, that is 24 demerit points and a court date just for that 15-second video. The driver's stupidity is pretty darn amazing.  Netizens' Comments Straight up facts. I doubt he can take corners and use his phone to film simulateneously🤐
    Wah, you didn't have to do him dirty like that.     ======== Receive a $10 PayNow transfer for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️ https://bit.ly/3c6JERA  

    thatJDMahboy

    thatJDMahboy

    Video footage of the Parliament accident: Lower your volume for this one

    There is finally video footage of the recent accident outside the Parliament House. For those who are unfamiliar with the accident, a Honda Vezel ran the red light and ended up getting T-boned by a BMW. This resulted in the Honda flipping on its side and getting wedged onto the road bollards, which shocked the female passenger in the camcar who witnessed the accident. More than a dozen individuals, including the camcar driver, got out of their vehicles to help. They were seen attempting to lift the Honda to an upright position in an attempt to rescue the victims.   The severity of the accident led to the deployment of the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF). It was reported that 5 individuals were transported to the Singapore General Hospital. According to the Straits Times, the 5 individuals comprised of 2 male drivers aged 51 and 59, and 3 passengers aged between 28 and 61. They were all conscious during the transport to the hospital.  Netizens' reactions We wish all of the victims a speedy recovery!     ------- Witnessed an accident? See something interesting on the roads? Submit your image/video/news via MyCarForum's WhatsApp. We'll pay you $10 per post!      

    unicornfloof

    unicornfloof

    Complacent cyclist ignores red light and gets wiped out by a Toyota Corolla on New Year's Eve

    Some would say that he got instant car-ma for disregarding the rules. In a short clip posted on New Year’s Day, an elderly cyclist boldly crosses a traffic junction when the light is still red. The cyclist then gets a nasty surprise when a white Toyota Corolla crashes into his bicycle. Hopefully, the uncle learns his lesson and will heed the traffic rules from now on. Who is at fault if a driver hits a jaywalking pedestrian? According to the Road Traffic Rules, if a pedestrian crosses any place other than a pedestrian crossing, they shall yield the right of way to vehicles. The same applies to mobility vehicle users, PMD riders and cyclists. However, at any controlled crossing, pedestrians have the precedence to free and uninterrupted passage over the crossing by drivers of vehicles approaching the crossing. It should be noted that this only applies when pedestrians are crossing in the same direction as moving traffic. Pedestrians shall not travel in any other direction unless they can do so without interfering with the lawful movement of traffic. Even though the driver has the right of way, personal injury lawyers have noted that the driver may still be held liable for any bodily injury claim from the pedestrian. This includes payment for their present and future medical bills, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and lost wages. If the pedestrian is found guilty of jaywalking, they could be held partially at fault for the accident. However, drivers are considered more at fault in a jaywalking accident if there was an opportunity to avoid the accident and didn’t take it. While it is tricky to ascertain who is at fault here, the cyclist should not have crossed the road on a red light and the driver should have slowed down when entering the junction. This applies even when the light is green for the driver, as one might not be able to react in time if jaywalkers are crossing. Netizens’ reactions That's right! It doesn't matter if you are a pedestrian or a driver, everyone must adhere to the rules. 😤 When you think about it, it really isn't fair for drivers, even when they have the right of way. It's tough being a driver. 😭 Hope the driver didn't injure himself from braking too hard! 😅      ======== Receive a $10 PayNow for every submission we publish on Facebook! Simply WhatsApp us ➡️https://bit.ly/3c6JERA

    unicornfloof

    unicornfloof

×