Cbx750p 1st Gear August 7, 2007 Share August 7, 2007 What a way to go ! Straight into a brick wall at 110 kmph ! How safe is safe when continental cars are concerned ? Guess no cars are designed to crash into a brick wall in excess of 100 kmph ! CBX ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiao_qiang 1st Gear August 7, 2007 Share August 7, 2007 My god!! The crash is so serious only at 110KM/h. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bsbs Neutral Newbie August 7, 2007 Share August 7, 2007 (edited) OMG! the wheelbase became shorter than QQ . I hope the skoda taxi uncles will now think twice b4 speeding around at F1 speed . BTW there is already another thread on this topic, but this pic is definately more gruesome! http://www.mycarforum.com/forum/General_C1...hed..._P1995854 Edited August 7, 2007 by Bsbs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soonalvin Neutral Newbie August 7, 2007 Share August 7, 2007 NCAP ratings are relevant for Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passion 5th Gear August 7, 2007 Share August 7, 2007 yup.Don't play play with pillars and retaining wall.They are build to support tons of weight.Just one tonne wanna bring it down?Think again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putter Neutral Newbie August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 European NCSP tests at 40mph which is 64km/h into a deformable barrier. This is 1 solid concrete, I think even trucker will be killed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 Don't forget princess diana's huge merc crashed against the pillar at around 100km/hr also. No cars can survive any direct crashes at such speed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 NCAP frontal ratings are based on an off-set direct crash at 64km/hr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Familymanz 3rd Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 My god!! The crash is so serious only at 110KM/h. ONLY?!!! think maybe an Armoured Tank can survive tat speed ba..... if those metal can reached tat speed in the 1st place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vidz 6th Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 (edited) but inside will still be minced meat... Edited August 8, 2007 by Vidz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nkps 1st Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 wonder armour tank can ever travel up to that speed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 my 2.5 ton mustank kena that wall also no chance man! that kind of concrete wall is reinforced with steel bar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nine_eleven 2nd Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 you answered your own question! no car is designed to handle that kind of stopping force ie: concrete wall. 'speeding never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you' (someone's signature) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soonalvin Neutral Newbie August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 jeremy clarkson said that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolff Neutral Newbie August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 What if it is a chinese car...pancake? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 http://www.euroncap.com/Content-Web-Faq/21...b0-734ae8cb74e9 ncap faq: "Why have you chosen such a high front impact test speed? By carrying out frontal impact tests at 64km/h (about 40 mph) we are simulating a car impacting a similar sized car where both cars are travelling the same speed of 55 km/h. This speed has been shown by accident studies to address a high proportion of fatal and severe injury accidents. Should this not be higher given driving speed limits are higher? Accident research shows that carrying out frontal impacts at 64km/h speed covers a large proportion of the serious and fatal accidents which occur. Even if the maximum speed limit is 120 km/h, few accidents occur at such speeds and where they do, it is beyond current capabilities to provide protection for the car's occupants. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suxelis Neutral Newbie August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 Don't forget princess diana's huge merc crashed against the pillar at around 100km/hr also. No cars can survive any direct crashes at such speed. She would have survived if she wore her seatbelt. I wonder how strong the skoda is compared to its cousins Passat and A4? But its true anyway there is not much difference bewteen continental and non-European cars in crash safety nowadays; as long as they want to sell in EC, they will be as strong and as heavy as the europeans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbonetics 2nd Gear August 8, 2007 Share August 8, 2007 talking about high speed crash,no car is safe,even not for Rolls Royce. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
10 killed after 2 Malaysian military helicopters collide in mid-air
10 killed after 2 Malaysian military helicopters collide in mid-air
Electric cars
Electric cars
1 dead, 4 injured Mercedes crashes through railing at Tampines junction
1 dead, 4 injured Mercedes crashes through railing at Tampines junction
Unusual or Rare Cars - Part 3
Unusual or Rare Cars - Part 3
A New Chapter - Skoda Singapore
A New Chapter - Skoda Singapore
Cars at Expo - Apr 2024
Cars at Expo - Apr 2024
Cars: More than Meets the Eye....
Cars: More than Meets the Eye....
Cars We Don't Get to Drive in Singapore
Cars We Don't Get to Drive in Singapore