Sosaria Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 (edited) Would like to pose a question to the legal experts out there. I know we definitely have more than a few legal eagles in this forum. Question is: Someone gives me a contract for work to be performed, those kind that go "...whereas it is hereby agreed that...". I and the other party initial/sign each page to indicate that we have sighted the page. But then at the end of it, the other party puts down his signature on the space reserved for it at the end of the contract. I don't sign the space reserved for me. Instead, I only do the initial/sign thing at the bottom corner of this page. Is this contract valid, though I didn't put my signature at the big blank reserved for it with my name, I/C number printed below, etc.? Or in other words, if I breach the contract, can the other party claim damages according to the terms stated in the contract? Edited October 13, 2010 by Sosaria ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 (edited) Would like to pose a question to the legal experts out there. I know we definitely have more than a few legal eagles in this forum. Question is: Someone gives me a contract for work to be performed, those kind that go "...whereas it is hereby agreed that...". I and the other party initial/sign each page to indicate that we have sighted the page. But then at the end of it, the other party puts down his signature on the space reserved for it at the end of the contract. I don't sign the space reserved for me. Instead, I only do the initial/sign thing at the bottom corner of this page. Is this contract valid, though I didn't put my signature at the big blank reserved for it with my name, I/C number printed below, etc.? Or in other words, if I breach the contract, can the other party claim damages according to the terms stated in the contract? did the last page require witness' signature for both party? or does the agreement need to be stamped? Edited October 13, 2010 by Jman888 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sosaria Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Author Share October 13, 2010 did the last page require witness' signature for both party? or does the agreement need to be stamped? No witness. To be more specific, this is a reno contract. There are penalties stated in the contract, e.g. for cancellation. I'm wondering how much legal standing does this kind of contract have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freestylers09 5th Gear October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 No witness. To be more specific, this is a reno contract. There are penalties stated in the contract, e.g. for cancellation. I'm wondering how much legal standing does this kind of contract have. i not v sure..but most of the time..even do n no pay up..those contractors also suck thumb one..of coz so far i seen those kana..some clients v jiak lak use this tactic one hardly most will take legal action,likewise for clients especially havent even do the job yet... fight such cases v hard n difficult one leh...not all renovation companies can do such things one.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Bear Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 No witness. To be more specific, this is a reno contract. There are penalties stated in the contract, e.g. for cancellation. I'm wondering how much legal standing does this kind of contract have. Valid? Yes Enforceable? Maybe Worth it? Probably not Try to work things out. There can always be a compromise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanter 3rd Gear October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Short answer is Yes. There is a creature known as the verbal contract. No signature required. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Valid? Yes Enforceable? Maybe Worth it? Probably not Try to work things out. There can always be a compromise. you are not white bear, white bear don't compromise, white bear kill change back to hello kitty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Valid? Yes Enforceable? Maybe Worth it? Probably not Try to work things out. There can always be a compromise. agree that the agreement is valid since initiate on every page and the last mean you agreed to the terms & conditions. Not signing the main area could mean you overlook where to sign which usually will be reminded.... however since they are contractor, cannot blame them... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Bear Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 you are not white bear, white bear don't compromise, white bear kill change back to hello kitty I would compromise with the seals. e.g. "You want me to kill you then eat or eat your alive?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sosaria Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Author Share October 13, 2010 (edited) Short answer is Yes. There is a creature known as the verbal contract. No signature required. Oh yes, definitely there is a verbal agreement regarding the work to be carried out. But the fine print on the contract is not verbalised, e.g. the percentage you have to cough up for cancellation of works, etc. These T&Cs are only on the printed document, and this document's validity is now questionable. I gather from the various posts here that the other party's position is quite "maybe", and some compromise will have to be reached, in the event of breach of contract. I also gather that having witnesses, seals (NOT the animal!), etc. on the contract is not necessary for it to be valid. Why, then, do certain contracts have these things? Edited October 13, 2010 by Sosaria Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kar_lover Supercharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 I don't tink its valid. The little initial u put at the corner of the other pages is not only dat u sighted but i believe main is so that either party cannot slip in anything into the contract after the signing (as it would not have ur initial). The actual acceptance of the contract is the "big signature". Unlikely the contractor will pursue as not worth it and his position is pretty weak unless he has already done some work for u (eg. ordering of materials as per ur instruction) which implies that you have already agreed to the work and the signing is more of a formality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanter 3rd Gear October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Certain agreements for examples deeds or guarantees etc require a seal & witness due to the lack of legal consideration. Your reno contract initialled by you is evidence that you intended to contract with the other party even if you didnt sign in the correct place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galantspeedz Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Certain agreements for examples deeds or guarantees etc require a seal & witness due to the lack of legal consideration. Your reno contract initialled by you is evidence that you intended to contract with the other party even if you didnt sign in the correct place. like you say.. intention..... intention i believe is not legal binding..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryn Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Certain agreements for examples deeds or guarantees etc require a seal & witness due to the lack of legal consideration. Your reno contract initialled by you is evidence that you intended to contract with the other party even if you didnt sign in the correct place. +1...if you intended to enter the contract it is valid, whether you signed correctly, in red ink instead of blue or whatever is of no consequence. IT is valid because you intended to enter into a contract, that you signed incorrectly is of no consequence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanter 3rd Gear October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 +1...if you intended to enter the contract it is valid, whether you signed correctly, in red ink instead of blue or whatever is of no consequence. IT is valid because you intended to enter into a contract, that you signed incorrectly is of no consequence. Precisely. If you put X where ur signature is suppose to be, its still a valid agreement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryn Turbocharged October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 like you say.. intention..... intention i believe is not legal binding..... So next you will be telling us that if there is a mis-spelling the contract is invalid? At the end of the day, the intention of the party is clear, he initaled the pages, he wanted to enter the contract, was of the correct frame of mind, was not coerced, that "signature" is not his actual signature does not affect the validity of the agreement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PointyEwe Clutched October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 Contract is binding lah. Emails, handwritten, verbal all are legally binding and can be presented as contracts in court. Of course must show proofs wan lah, and the legal proceedings would have exceeded the damages to be claimed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hub_n_mona 1st Gear October 13, 2010 Share October 13, 2010 (edited) like you say.. intention..... intention i believe is not legal binding..... bro, he initialled on the page (just that not on "correct spot")..some more every single page is signed there is offer, consideration and acceptance.. the last tenet of intention to create legal relations is the one that ts is wriggling out of.. imho, I think it's legal binding..obviously, best to ask a contract lawyer Edited October 13, 2010 by Hub_n_mona ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Old WW2 Relic disposals
Old WW2 Relic disposals
Hospital blooper and seeking legal advices
Hospital blooper and seeking legal advices
Those how have FAT belly please read this
Those how have FAT belly please read this
Stop False Accusation
Stop False Accusation
Self-defence weapons are illegal in Singapore?
Self-defence weapons are illegal in Singapore?
This ship is sch...loooOOOooong.
This ship is sch...loooOOOooong.
Advice on legal recourse for lapse of care of distributor servicing
Advice on legal recourse for lapse of care of distributor servicing
AutoSaver - Is this recommended workshop
AutoSaver - Is this recommended workshop