Jump to content

SM: GRCs Make It Easier To Find Top Talent


Vulcann
 Share

Recommended Posts

Any bros still remember this guy saying this back then?

 

http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Issue/st...es20060627.aspx

 

(Prime Page 4)

 

The Straits Times, June 27, 2006

GRCs make it easier to find top talent: SM

Without good chance of winning at polls, they might not be willing to risk careers for politics

 

By Li Xueying

 

SENIOR Minister Goh Chok Tong yesterday gave a new take on the role of Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs) in Singapore politics.

 

Their role is not just to ensure minorities are adequately represented in Parliament, he said. They also contribute to Singapore's political stability, by 'helping us to recruit younger and capable candidates with the potential to become ministers'.

 

'Without some assurance of a good chance of winning at least their first election, many able and successful young Singaporeans may not risk their careers to join politics,' Mr Goh said at an event marking the appointment of members to the South East Community Development Council (CDC).

 

'Why should they when they are on the way up in the civil service, the SAF, and in the professions or the corporate world?'

 

But he was quick to add that GRCs themselves do not guarantee victory.

 

'A minister wins only because he has won the people's trust and the Government has delivered good results for the people. If a minister performed poorly, it could result in his losing the GRC to an opposing team with a strong leader,' he said, in what appears to be an oblique reference to comments made against GRCs in the general election held this May.

 

Since GRCs were introduced in 1988, critics and the opposition have attacked them, saying they allow rookie People's Action Party (PAP) candidates to get into Parliament on the coat tails of heavyweight candidates in their team.

 

Also, they do not lend themselves to a level playing field, they add, as the opposition struggles to find the specified minority-race candidates.

 

Mr Goh carried four new faces into Parliament in the six-man Marine Parade GRC team, which was unchallenged at the 2006 polls.

 

Altogether, the PAP had 24 new faces. One was Mr Teo Ser Luck, former general manager of courier company DHL and now Parliamentary Secretary (Community Development, Youth and Sports).

 

He acknowledges that for a rookie politician, being part of a team ensures that 'you have a bigger chance of winning'.

 

'If you're fighting individually, you go through a steep learning curve and you may not have enough time,' he added.

 

East Coast GRC MP Lee Yi Shyan, who left his job as chief executive officer of IE Singapore and is today Minister of State (Trade and Industry), concurred: 'If the system can remove as many impediments as possible, then the political system will be able to get more people to join.'

 

But both told The Straits Times they would have entered politics even if they had been fielded in a single-seat ward. Said Mr Lee with a laugh: 'You could say that I'm more confident of myself!'

 

In his speech, Mr Goh also stressed that the PAP's ability to attract capable individuals and its practice of political self-renewal were key to Singapore's success.

 

Turning to the CDCs' role, Mr Goh highlighted their important position as a bridge between 'rules-bound' government departments and grassroots organisations.

 

CDCs are agile, flexible, and give personal attention to residents, he said. 'They are therefore better placed to devise local solutions to tackle local issues.'

 

Mr Goh, who in 1996 mooted the CDC idea, lauded their achievements, highlighting their role in community bonding, as well as finding jobs for retrenched workers and helping the needy. He now wants them to undertake yet another task: helping to reverse the declining birth rate.

 

He has suggested to Mayor Matthias Yao that his South East CDC draw up an accredited list of service providers to help parents, who can pay for them with their baby bonus.

 

'Such accreditation can help ensure the quality of services or lower costs through economies of scale,' he said.

 

[email protected]

Edited by Vulcann
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any bros still remember this guy saying this back then?

 

http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Issue/st...es20060627.aspx

 

(Prime Page 4)

 

The Straits Times, June 27, 2006

GRCs make it easier to find top talent: SM

Without good chance of winning at polls, they might not be willing to risk careers for politics

 

By Li Xueying

 

SENIOR Minister Goh Chok Tong yesterday gave a new take on the role of Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs) in Singapore politics.

 

Their role is not just to ensure minorities are adequately represented in Parliament, he said. They also contribute to Singapore's political stability, by 'helping us to recruit younger and capable candidates with the potential to become ministers'.

 

'Without some assurance of a good chance of winning at least their first election, many able and successful young Singaporeans may not risk their careers to join politics,' Mr Goh said at an event marking the appointment of members to the South East Community Development Council (CDC).

 

'Why should they when they are on the way up in the civil service, the SAF, and in the professions or the corporate world?'

 

But he was quick to add that GRCs themselves do not guarantee victory.

 

'A minister wins only because he has won the people's trust and the Government has delivered good results for the people. If a minister performed poorly, it could result in his losing the GRC to an opposing team with a strong leader,' he said, in what appears to be an oblique reference to comments made against GRCs in the general election held this May.

 

Since GRCs were introduced in 1988, critics and the opposition have attacked them, saying they allow rookie People's Action Party (PAP) candidates to get into Parliament on the coat tails of heavyweight candidates in their team.

 

Also, they do not lend themselves to a level playing field, they add, as the opposition struggles to find the specified minority-race candidates.

 

Mr Goh carried four new faces into Parliament in the six-man Marine Parade GRC team, which was unchallenged at the 2006 polls.

 

Altogether, the PAP had 24 new faces. One was Mr Teo Ser Luck, former general manager of courier company DHL and now Parliamentary Secretary (Community Development, Youth and Sports).

 

He acknowledges that for a rookie politician, being part of a team ensures that 'you have a bigger chance of winning'.

 

'If you're fighting individually, you go through a steep learning curve and you may not have enough time,' he added.

 

East Coast GRC MP Lee Yi Shyan, who left his job as chief executive officer of IE Singapore and is today Minister of State (Trade and Industry), concurred: 'If the system can remove as many impediments as possible, then the political system will be able to get more people to join.'

 

But both told The Straits Times they would have entered politics even if they had been fielded in a single-seat ward. Said Mr Lee with a laugh: 'You could say that I'm more confident of myself!'

 

In his speech, Mr Goh also stressed that the PAP's ability to attract capable individuals and its practice of political self-renewal were key to Singapore's success.

 

Turning to the CDCs' role, Mr Goh highlighted their important position as a bridge between 'rules-bound' government departments and grassroots organisations.

 

CDCs are agile, flexible, and give personal attention to residents, he said. 'They are therefore better placed to devise local solutions to tackle local issues.'

 

Mr Goh, who in 1996 mooted the CDC idea, lauded their achievements, highlighting their role in community bonding, as well as finding jobs for retrenched workers and helping the needy. He now wants them to undertake yet another task: helping to reverse the declining birth rate.

 

He has suggested to Mayor Matthias Yao that his South East CDC draw up an accredited list of service providers to help parents, who can pay for them with their baby bonus.

 

'Such accreditation can help ensure the quality of services or lower costs through economies of scale,' he said.

 

[email protected]

 

can a great piece of iron ore become the top class sword like 倚天剑 without going through the rings of fire?

Edited by Acemundo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

All successful people go through great adversities to become what they are.. There is no short cut to success.. -_- -_-

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

All successful people go through great adversities to become what they are.. There is no short cut to success.. -_- -_-

 

Apparently there is a shortcut when you are in Pee Ape Pee

Link to post
Share on other sites

they say what they want you to hear.

 

The simpletons will be easily swayed. And being singaporeans, many will just take the authorities' words as the absolute truth.

Edited by Chrispie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Apparently there is a shortcut when you are in Pee Ape Pee

 

additional statement.. shortcut to greatness will result in 1) greatness 2) Epic fail.. leave it to you to decide which one has a higher percentage..

Link to post
Share on other sites

All successful people go through great adversities to become what they are.. There is no short cut to success.. -_- -_-

 

*sigh* <_<

Link to post
Share on other sites

GRC makes it easier to win election. hard truth perhaps?

 

This is not hard truth: this is what apparently is happening.

 

Just hope that the WP chief means what he says & concentrate on winning a GRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what he said is true. however, can these people be considered true talents?

 

The same can be said about the ruling party MPs.

 

Every GE will see some 20-25% "self-renewal" process from them.

 

Granted that some of them were genuine retirement cases but what about the rest?

 

Not implying that they are incapable but the fact remains that they may be unsuitable to be backbenchers due to reasons like not being able to blend in, too much time & less for self/family/job/business, too high a standard to maintain, not able to "communicate" with the ground folks & a host of other reasons you & me do not & may never know.

 

We are talking about say 20/100x82=16 folks being replaced each time.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The same can be said about the ruling party MPs.

 

Every GE will see some 20-25% "self-renewal" process from them.

 

Granted that some of them were genuine retirement cases but what about the rest?

 

Not implying that they are incapable but the fact remains that they may be unsuitable to be backbenchers due to reasons like not being able to blend in, too much time & less for self/family/job/business, too high a standard to maintain, not able to "communicate" with the ground folks & a host of other reasons you & me do not & may never know.

 

We are talking about say 20/100x82=16 folks being replaced each time.

 

how many years is it taking them to realise chan soo sen can't make it as a minister or a MP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any bros still remember this guy saying this back then?

 

http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Issue/st...es20060627.aspx

 

(Prime Page 4)

 

The Straits Times, June 27, 2006

GRCs make it easier to find top talent: SM

Without good chance of winning at polls, they might not be willing to risk careers for politics

 

By Li Xueying

 

SENIOR Minister Goh Chok Tong yesterday gave a new take on the role of Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs) in Singapore politics.

 

Their role is not just to ensure minorities are adequately represented in Parliament, he said. They also contribute to Singapore's political stability, by 'helping us to recruit younger and capable candidates with the potential to become ministers'.

 

'Without some assurance of a good chance of winning at least their first election, many able and successful young Singaporeans may not risk their careers to join politics,' Mr Goh said at an event marking the appointment of members to the South East Community Development Council (CDC).

 

'Why should they when they are on the way up in the civil service, the SAF, and in the professions or the corporate world?'

 

But he was quick to add that GRCs themselves do not guarantee victory.

 

'A minister wins only because he has won the people's trust and the Government has delivered good results for the people. If a minister performed poorly, it could result in his losing the GRC to an opposing team with a strong leader,' he said, in what appears to be an oblique reference to comments made against GRCs in the general election held this May.

 

Since GRCs were introduced in 1988, critics and the opposition have attacked them, saying they allow rookie People's Action Party (PAP) candidates to get into Parliament on the coat tails of heavyweight candidates in their team.

 

Also, they do not lend themselves to a level playing field, they add, as the opposition struggles to find the specified minority-race candidates.

 

Mr Goh carried four new faces into Parliament in the six-man Marine Parade GRC team, which was unchallenged at the 2006 polls.

 

Altogether, the PAP had 24 new faces. One was Mr Teo Ser Luck, former general manager of courier company DHL and now Parliamentary Secretary (Community Development, Youth and Sports).

 

He acknowledges that for a rookie politician, being part of a team ensures that 'you have a bigger chance of winning'.

 

'If you're fighting individually, you go through a steep learning curve and you may not have enough time,' he added.

 

East Coast GRC MP Lee Yi Shyan, who left his job as chief executive officer of IE Singapore and is today Minister of State (Trade and Industry), concurred: 'If the system can remove as many impediments as possible, then the political system will be able to get more people to join.'

 

But both told The Straits Times they would have entered politics even if they had been fielded in a single-seat ward. Said Mr Lee with a laugh: 'You could say that I'm more confident of myself!'

 

In his speech, Mr Goh also stressed that the PAP's ability to attract capable individuals and its practice of political self-renewal were key to Singapore's success.

 

Turning to the CDCs' role, Mr Goh highlighted their important position as a bridge between 'rules-bound' government departments and grassroots organisations.

 

CDCs are agile, flexible, and give personal attention to residents, he said. 'They are therefore better placed to devise local solutions to tackle local issues.'

 

Mr Goh, who in 1996 mooted the CDC idea, lauded their achievements, highlighting their role in community bonding, as well as finding jobs for retrenched workers and helping the needy. He now wants them to undertake yet another task: helping to reverse the declining birth rate.

 

He has suggested to Mayor Matthias Yao that his South East CDC draw up an accredited list of service providers to help parents, who can pay for them with their baby bonus.

 

'Such accreditation can help ensure the quality of services or lower costs through economies of scale,' he said.

 

[email protected]

I believe he meant those people who lack self confidence to entertain one-to-one-candidate election contest. It could also meant to encourage the reluctant people to participate as their candidates. Now can understand why no CPF withdrawal for the younger people, in case they stand for election with the money

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What? [:(]

 

Our MPs gutless, convictionless opportunists? [bigcry]

You just age 21 now, or new citizen no idea about local politics? GRCs for malingering MPs deemed incompetent to contest election with one-to-one candidate challenge

Link to post
Share on other sites

what he said is true. however, can these people be considered true talents?

Excuses only, for fielding those candidates he considered to be incompetent for one-to-one candidate challenge during election.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what he said is true. however, can these people be considered true talents?

We need no 'talent' or GRCs (Generally Rising Costs) for inflation. We need representation of the general citizens interest. Many people still mislead into foreign talents stories?

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...