Jump to content

Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection r


Chengwh492
 Share

Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection right thing to do?  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection right thing to do?

    • YES
      1
    • NO
      19
    • DONT CARE
      7


Recommended Posts

Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection right thing to do?

 

vote above wisely.

Edited by Chengwh492
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection right thing to do?

 

vote above wisely.

Very low class act, if you ask me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection right thing to do?

 

vote above wisely.

 

absolutely pathetic... [rifle]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Is dangling upgrading and scholarship carrot near erection right thing to do?

 

vote above wisely.

 

Can you please define right?

 

1. Right, as in right wing? as in Republican / Conservative / National - as in low tax / personal responsibility believers?

2. Right as in the morally correct thing that treats people and opponents with respect?

3. Right as in, "this is the action that is most likely to win me the election" so it is the right thing to do to maximise my chances of success?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Their promises n realizations not consistent.

 

In the process made some mistakes n offended ppl.

 

So have to dish out suspicious measures.Rite? [:/]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please define right?

 

1. Right, as in right wing? as in Republican / Conservative / National - as in low tax / personal responsibility believers?

2. Right as in the morally correct thing that treats people and opponents with respect?

3. Right as in, "this is the action that is most likely to win me the election" so it is the right thing to do to maximise my chances of success?

 

Many thanks

 

oh i am sorry, its a broken english way of saying 'correct', 'legal'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

oh i am sorry, its a broken english way of saying 'correct', 'legal'?

 

Hee...

I am being nitpicky.

 

 

What am trying to say though is there is a difference between

a) legal

b) morally correct

c) the course of action most likely to win the election.

 

Whether the "dangling of carrots" is right or not will depend on which definition you use.

 

For me

a) legal - YES

b) morally correct - NO

c) the course of action most likely to win the election. - YES

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every party dangles carrots in their own ways isn't it? What's wrong?

 

If you vote for me, I will give you ............................................

 

Isn't this standard in election?

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i ask if opposition win, can they take the carrot and give the people since it is the taxpayer $ and not the lightning toads?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Every party dangles carrots in their own ways isn't it? What's wrong?

 

If you vote for me, I will give you ............................................

 

Isn't this standard in election?

 

The difference here is that

a) it is the residents money

b) the PAP position is quite explicitly that "this WARD will only get if the PAP wins this ward"

 

While the position should be - "as the government we believe that this ward needs X, if we are the ruling party they will get X"

 

The difference is in that the needs of the ward don'tt change with who is representing them. But acccording to the PAP dogma, they explicitly say the needs do change depending upon who is the MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference here is that

a) it is the residents money

b) the PAP position is quite explicitly that "this WARD will only get if the PAP wins this ward"

 

While the position should be - "as the government we believe that this ward needs X, if we are the ruling party they will get X"

 

The difference is in that the needs of the ward don'tt change with who is representing them. But acccording to the PAP dogma, they explicitly say the needs do change depending upon who is the MP.

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...