Ronleech 2nd Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 Yesterday was driving on PIE towards Jurong after passing the Police training school, about 4.30pm +-, saw this black merz 200 plated 12 MID. Saw some "crabs" on his shoulder and was really disappointed...DRIVING WHILE TALKING ON HIS HANDPHONE... Talk about bad image from civil servant... thot uniform group should be more on the ball but not this guy...disgrace. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shox87 4th Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 if im not wrong this car is for the CDF. does it have the 3 stars on the back? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zniper 2nd Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 u got take photo? send it in if u have... if u have but dun dare send in, send to me and i will definitely send in... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTan 2nd Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 He might be discussing war or defense preparation, in case Greek defaults or regional outbreak. No use lah...send photo also LAN LAN.....his manhours and importance far far outweigh the phone usage. He can justify his is discussion the life of 5million citizens at stake......whereas the phone driving accident only at most one car driver life at stake. How to argue with that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom_kkh 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 the crab might be the driver for the stars. of course have ahmad mentality la Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightsky 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 Was he driving recklessly/carelessly? No? Then u huan lo simi? I've seen drivers drive reckless/carelessly/dangerously even without talking on handphones, they are an even bigger road hazard. Just because they are in uniform and are a quantifiable target does not make you any more morally upright. If you derive pleasure at such trivial matters, I pity your ignominious existence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAI011 Clutched November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 so sad so sad .......paid so high can't afford to buy handfree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavili Neutral Newbie November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 (edited) That piece of crab can always use a handfree earpiece to communicate. Edited November 5, 2011 by Cavili Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 (edited) Yesterday was driving on PIE towards Jurong after passing the Police training school, about 4.30pm +-, saw this black merz 200 plated 12 MID. Saw some "crabs" on his shoulder and was really disappointed...DRIVING WHILE TALKING ON HIS HANDPHONE... Talk about bad image from civil servant... thot uniform group should be more on the ball but not this guy...disgrace. I believe we all appreciate and very thankful if you report such observations to the authorities. You help make the roads safer for all of us. Many thanks. Kindly also email a parallel copy of your report to the Prime Minsiter's Office. Edited November 5, 2011 by Good-Carbuyer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 He might be discussing war or defense preparation, in case Greek defaults or regional outbreak. No use lah...send photo also LAN LAN.....his manhours and importance far far outweigh the phone usage. He can justify his is discussion the life of 5million citizens at stake......whereas the phone driving accident only at most one car driver life at stake. How to argue with that? Mercy-mercy. All road users are at risk from such irresponsible/disorderly driving. Kindly do not put us at such risk if you are one such driver, too. Speaking many-many, working little bit, has no positive production for anyone's benefit/safety.That nimcompoop driver is a sheer waste of public fund to be employed, since he demonstrated such negligence in his driving. His Employer ought to be ashame of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 He might be discussing war or defense preparation, in case Greek defaults or regional outbreak. No use lah...send photo also LAN LAN.....his manhours and importance far far outweigh the phone usage. He can justify his is discussion the life of 5million citizens at stake......whereas the phone driving accident only at most one car driver life at stake. How to argue with that? If you are kidding with us, this is not quite ticklish. If not, are you send by motor insurers here to misled us into more traffic accidents statistic, in order to raise premium next year when the economy turn for the worse? How could you cordon act of negligence in driving like handphone driving? Can we believe you are proud of yourself when the motor insurance premiums be raised next year? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 the crab might be the driver for the stars. of course have ahmad mentality la You got the point. You are rght. He may be on his way to his IHM observation appointment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 Was he driving recklessly/carelessly? No? Then u huan lo simi? I've seen drivers drive reckless/carelessly/dangerously even without talking on handphones, they are an even bigger road hazard. Just because they are in uniform and are a quantifiable target does not make you any more morally upright. If you derive pleasure at such trivial matters, I pity your ignominious existence. If you are kidding with us, you failed Highway Code test just like that. If you are not kidding. You should not be a qualified driver (How could a qualified driver not know the Highway Code?). Do attend Highway Code lessons even though we may all be very forgiving to you on this occassion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 so sad so sad .......paid so high can't afford to buy handfree That is still handphone driving? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Good-Carbuyer 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 war is coming You got the point. You are right. These are likely send by motor insurers to misled us into more traffic accidents statistic. Next this statistic will be used to justify the need to recover from accident claims by motorists, even if the economy turn for the worse next year. Motor insurance premiums will be raised by these decoys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happily1986 5th Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 (edited) Was he driving recklessly/carelessly? No? Then u huan lo simi? I've seen drivers drive reckless/carelessly/dangerously even without talking on handphones, they are an even bigger road hazard. Just because they are in uniform and are a quantifiable target does not make you any more morally upright. If you derive pleasure at such trivial matters, I pity your ignominious existence. disagree. Mindef specifically issued a GOM warning against using a handphone while driving. you heard of the saying 军令如山 before or not? Last time when i was NSF, everybody kia like s--t when in uniform, don't dare to do stupid things in uniform else get charged. My father is still in service and there are countless regulars like him abide by the law. Why should the farker get away with it? What's so special you tell me? Issue a GOM and then have farkers like him get away with it then where is the sanctity of a GOM? sheesh. Edited November 5, 2011 by Happily1986 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightsky 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 disagree. Mindef specifically issued a GOM warning against using a handphone while driving. you heard of the saying 军令如山 before or not? Last time when i was NSF, everybody kia like s--t when in uniform, don't dare to do stupid things in uniform else get charged. My father is still in service and there are countless regulars like him abide by the law. Why should the farker get away with it? What's so special you tell me? Issue a GOM and then have farkers like him get away with it then where is the sanctity of a GOM? sheesh. Fair enough, though what if he's the one who signed off on it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightsky 1st Gear November 5, 2011 Share November 5, 2011 If you are kidding with us, you failed Highway Code test just like that. If you are not kidding. You should not be a qualified driver (How could a qualified driver not know the Highway Code?). Do attend Highway Code lessons even though we may all be very forgiving to you on this occassion. It's ok, I never took any Highway Code test, and in any case WTF is a highway code test? Which era do you live in? I drive my father's old hatchback Toyota to do Tau Huay delivery to Jewel Box every 4am in the morning, every morning, rain or snow. I drive with a cup of soya bean milk in the cup holder, and the challenge is not to spill any during the delivery and back ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now