Jump to content

Individual contributor versus managerial role


Espresso
 Share

Recommended Posts

Neutral Newbie

Which do you prefer?

 

I have been in both position and honestly, while individual contributor role provides more room for self actualization and satisfaction, managerial role is much more visible/rewarding and for lesser effort.

 

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

One has to play 2 roles unless you are at non-supervisory level then u cant play the role of managing...A manager must be one that is able to manage from a macro perspective and yet able to dive into the details and roll up his/her sleves...I am a very individualistic person..if I am surrounded by less competent ppl, I will be an individual contributor...if I have a good team, then I will collaborate and delegate... As a manager, i look for the key strengths of each individual and try to maximise them to the fullest potential...maximising the potential of the people who worked for you will help them motivate themselves to achieve beyond their own imagination...from this result, you achieve actualisation of your managing skill...

Edited by Cars08
Link to post
Share on other sites

Which do you prefer?

 

I have been in both position and honestly, while individual contributor role provides more room for self actualization and satisfaction, managerial role is much more visible/rewarding and for lesser effort.

work place manager

 

personal space doer. save money and get hands-on experience

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whose care......which role give me the most salary package...I will take it......as one bro stated in his signature.. ''I hate my job....not the salary'' [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of physical work, Management MAY be more relaxed. However, it is definately more stressful mentally and I honestly say not everyone have the temperament for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

In terms of physical work, Management MAY be more relaxed. However, it is definately more stressful mentally and I honestly say not everyone have the temperament for it.

 

It takes some form of maturity and experience. Like I tell my team sometimes..."I dont do such detailed ground level work. I have done all that in the past. My job is to identify good work done. My job is to ensure that you are successful in what you are doing, to provide you guidance and advice (and make sure you get the work done or you are out)"

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being in the managerial role means I can surf MCF with more peace of mind.. Individual contributor has to alwayswatch over your back.

Edited by Ender
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Being in the managerial role means I can surf MCF with more peace of mind.. Individual contributor has to alwayswatch over your back.

 

Just to clarify, individual contributor doesnt mean more junior, just dont have a team to look after thats all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, individual contributor doesnt mean more junior, just dont have a team to look after thats all.

Ok, like consultant or SME like that...

Link to post
Share on other sites

One has to play 2 roles unless you are at non-supervisory level then u cant play the role of managing...A manager must be one that is able to manage from a macro perspective and yet able to dive into the details and roll up his/her sleves...I am a very individualistic person..if I am surrounded by less competent ppl, I will be an individual contributor...if I have a good team, then I will collaborate and delegate... As a manager, i look for the key strengths of each individual and try to maximise them to the fullest potential...maximising the potential of the people who worked for you will help them motivate themselves to achieve beyond their own imagination...from this result, you achieve actualisation of your managing skill...

[thumbsup]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which do you prefer?

 

I have been in both position and honestly, while individual contributor role provides more room for self actualization and satisfaction, managerial role is much more visible/rewarding and for lesser effort.

 

Based on my work experience stretching more than 2 decades, I can tell you this.

 

Up and coming young blood will always state managerial in their appraisal forms.

Managers who have been there and done that, will not blink to tell you that they'd prefer an individual contributor's role.

 

After you have managed a section division, or the whole department, you will really want out ... unless you are really into people administration - from appraisals, ranking, salary, promotions, transfers, training, HR matters ... and/or performance-based stuff like stewardship, planning & budgetting, audits, KPIs, frequent night telecons with HQ, compliance of management systems and all the other fcuk crap!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being in the managerial role means I can surf MCF with more peace of mind.. Individual contributor has to alwayswatch over your back.

 

[laugh] [laugh] [laugh] But, cannot escape from IT eyes no matter how.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...