Jump to content

Serving notice period


Karoon
 Share

Recommended Posts

Turbocharged

Dear MCFers

 

Need advice on notice period... is it normal for Sg companies to cut short the notice period once you tender resignation?

 

eg a person's notice period is 3 months. The moment he tendered, the company let him go within a month on grounds that he could be joining competitor, his heart is not in it, etc etc even though the guy is willing to go through the 3 months (during which time he will also clear outstanding leave).

 

 

 

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Dear MCFers

 

Need advice on notice period... is it normal for Sg companies to cut short the notice period once you tender resignation?

 

eg a person's notice period is 3 months. The moment he tendered, the company let him go within a month on grounds that he could be joining competitor, his heart is not in it, etc etc even though the guy is willing to go through the 3 months (during which time he will also clear outstanding leave).

not normal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its between the two parties within the agreement terms. If the employee wants to stay back and do nothing, but the employer wants him to go, the employer has to pay him in lieu

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

Could depends on individual company policy, and also the position the person in. Some company release the employee earlier to avoid any sabotage, esp of the notice period is more than 1 month. But some company require the person to fufill the whole period of the notice period, since he/she might needs to hand over many many things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear MCFers

 

Need advice on notice period... is it normal for Sg companies to cut short the notice period once you tender resignation?

 

eg a person's notice period is 3 months. The moment he tendered, the company let him go within a month on grounds that he could be joining competitor, his heart is not in it, etc etc even though the guy is willing to go through the 3 months (during which time he will also clear outstanding leave).

 

Yes, very normal. Employer will have to pay him in lieu if employer wants him to leave earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most companies have agreement of 1 month notice wef the date whilst tender resignation letter. He will the clear his leaves if he still have balance.

 

But some private companies prefer to let them go immediately cos you won't know whether will they sarbotage ay company files whilst they are idling for 1 month... [sweatdrop]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, leave and take 3 months salary in lieu.

 

This is technically the best scenario; can start earlier in new co... and maybe take the salary in lieu for a short break..

Link to post
Share on other sites

For most in Sales, most will be asked to go immediately, salary in lieu.

 

For those at the top management, depends.

 

For most opic workers slogging long hours, may have to work until last day 6pm while still trying to hand over tasks for newbies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

tx. great inputs guys. contemplating last day. have seen too many cases where colleagues supposed to serve 3 months gone within 1 month. But they din get the 3 months pay... or mebbe they don't tell :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

Most companies have agreement of 1 month notice wef the date whilst tender resignation letter. He will the clear his leaves if he still have balance.

 

But some private companies prefer to let them go immediately cos you won't know whether will they sarbotage ay company files whilst they are idling for 1 month... [sweatdrop]

I still find many companies require the employee to serve the full 1 month notice. And many also doesnt allow the employee to use his balance leave to off-set the notice period. If the employee wants to leave earlier, he/she has to pay back to the company.

 

I find this type practise, it will result of losing many job opportunity for the employee. As for some case, some of them might found a job opportunity, but due to serving full 1 month notice, the new employer might hesitant to employ that person. Unless either the company dont mind paying for the person or the person portfolio very good, as the new employer dont mind waiting 1 month. [rolleyes]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Dear MCFers

 

Need advice on notice period... is it normal for Sg companies to cut short the notice period once you tender resignation?

 

eg a person's notice period is 3 months. The moment he tendered, the company let him go within a month on grounds that he could be joining competitor, his heart is not in it, etc etc even though the guy is willing to go through the 3 months (during which time he will also clear outstanding leave).

 

I don't think it's normal. Many companies by default hold you back for the entire notice period, e.g. 3 months, as this will deter other companies from easily recruiting.

 

Example, you go for interview, everything goes well, but sometimes the only sticking point is that they want you to start immediately, but you got this 3-month notice period that you must serve, or pay compensation. Sometimes if the new employer really wants you over, they might pay the compensation amount for you, but again, that is rare.

 

Usually only very large organisations, public service or civil service or other GLCs are willing to tolerate the long 3-month notice period, as they also practise it. But private companies and SMEs may not be able to, as they want new hires to start immediately if possible.

 

But all is not lost even if you have a 3-month notice period obligation. Other than paying back compensation, sometimes you can appeal directly to HR to be released early. Sometimes it works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tx. great inputs guys. contemplating last day. have seen too many cases where colleagues supposed to serve 3 months gone within 1 month. But they din get the 3 months pay... or mebbe they don't tell :)

 

If you are a PMET, you will need to engage legal help at your own cost in a civil proceeding against the company if the company decides to chao kuan not follow the terms of your employment, such as in this case say cutting short the notice period from 3 months to a month without paying the employee 2 months in lieu of notice.

 

So if your ex-colleagues were PMETs & left without a fight, they probably deemed it a hassle to go through the negotiation or even the legal route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I don't think it's normal. Many companies by default hold you back for the entire notice period, e.g. 3 months, as this will deter other companies from easily recruiting.

 

Example, you go for interview, everything goes well, but sometimes the only sticking point is that they want you to start immediately, but you got this 3-month notice period that you must serve, or pay compensation. Sometimes if the new employer really wants you over, they might pay the compensation amount for you, but again, that is rare.

 

Usually only very large organisations, public service or civil service or other GLCs are willing to tolerate the long 3-month notice period, as they also practise it. But private companies and SMEs may not be able to, as they want new hires to start immediately if possible.

 

But all is not lost even if you have a 3-month notice period obligation. Other than paying back compensation, sometimes you can appeal directly to HR to be released early. Sometimes it works.

what i though, if the offer from other company is really better, i will just pay off the balance. no point holding back a better offer because of 3 month salary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

Dear MCFers

 

Need advice on notice period... is it normal for Sg companies to cut short the notice period once you tender resignation?

 

eg a person's notice period is 3 months. The moment he tendered, the company let him go within a month on grounds that he could be joining competitor, his heart is not in it, etc etc even though the guy is willing to go through the 3 months (during which time he will also clear outstanding leave).

 

contract terms are all there. not all employers will just follow the norm if it is counter to contractual terms.

 

end of day also depends how nice is your boss that is resigning. i have met boss that jsut want to follow rules no matter how good your reasons for leaving early is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

yes..........normal..............as long they pay you the full 3 months pay..........they can ask you to stop coming tomorrow...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic
(edited)

Example, you go for interview, everything goes well, but sometimes the only sticking point is that they want you to start immediately, but you got this 3-month notice period that you must serve, or pay compensation. Sometimes if the new employer really wants you over, they might pay the compensation amount for you, but again, that is rare.

Agreed, esp if you found a job which the new company require the selected person to start immediately or in short period. I think the new employer might consider paying the compensation amount if the amount is not very high. Or like i said before, unless u are really very very good and suitable for the position, so they dont mind paying the compensation regardless how much the amount is. [rolleyes]

Edited by 13177
Link to post
Share on other sites

its either u serve notice period or they pay u in advance and u leave early. i prefer the latter.

 

depend on job nature, its useless to ask the person to serve 3 mths notice when his heart is not there anymore.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...