Jump to content

This Beast Worse Than Any Other Beast


Picnic06-Biante15
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

this type of man only know how to find excuse  [shakehead]
 
The chinese name of the law firm is quite interesting  [sly]  [sly]

 

 

 

their lawyer is Josephus Tan, the SG version of 流氓医生. Ex-gangster, tattoos aplenty and does a lot of pro-bono work. Subhas Anandan was his mentor. Oh, also a PAP member, supposed to be fielded last round 

 

[smallcry]  [smallcry] RIP little one ..... how could anyone do this to their own flesh and blood ?!??! 

 

Please do not insult beast, all these scums of the earth 畜生不如  [furious]

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

their lawyer is Josephus Tan, the SG version of 流氓医生. Ex-gangster, tattoos aplenty and does a lot of pro-bono work. Subhas Anandan was his mentor. Oh, also a PAP member, supposed to be fielded last round 

 

 

 

so that was him, i respect his work and i guess his role here is to reduce their sentence as much as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another beast

 

 

http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/boy-4-killed-mothers-heinous-vicious-abuse#cxrecs_s

Boy, 4, killed by mother’s ‘heinous’, ‘vicious’ abuse

 

RIP... this is another case of grievous hurt with intent to kill... 

their lawyer is Josephus Tan, the SG version of 流氓医生. Ex-gangster, tattoos aplenty and does a lot of pro-bono work. Subhas Anandan was his mentor. Oh, also a PAP member, supposed to be fielded last round 

 

PAP will field an ex-gangster with tattoos aplenty? 

 

well they already have an ah-beng minister la... haha... 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Songz... both mxxfarker jailed for more than 10 years each, with rotan x 14 for the guy.

May the deceased rest in peace, if not pls go changi chalet haunt these 2 a**hole.

 

https://sg.yahoo.com/news/couple-tortured-flatmate-8-months-death-jailed-14-16-5-years-025320463.html

Is it the woman is more culpable that she gets more years or is it the law doesn't cane woman, and hence given more years in place? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it the woman is more culpable that she gets more years or is it the law doesn't cane woman, and hence given more years in place?

In another way of looking at it.

It's known that our law favours woman in child related cases, they are more likely to win custody cos they are assumed to be gentle?. They start with "high ground" already.

 

So in any abuse case, vice versa, I see no reason why woman should not be punished more severely too.

 

But I also think this case is really to make up for caning.

Edited by Playtime
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Is it the woman is more culpable that she gets more years or is it the law doesn't cane woman, and hence given more years in place? 

 

read somewhere if good behavior, will only serve 2/3 of the sentence.

 

so the woman will be out after 11 years and the man, after 10 years with 14 rotan marks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judges must be reading & heard our ranting here .... :a-happy:

 

Resulting in heavy sentences... [smash]

 

 

 

 

OK own up, who you are so that we all can give 'praise' 5 points ... [sly]

 

From the way this judge speak out and upz these 2 mxxfarkers sentences, u can tell she is a conscientious judge, one who wanna right the wrong.

 

"Justice Hoo said that both Tan and Pua had abused Ee not just physically, but also psychologically and financially. She also said that Ee, who was assessed to be of low intellectual ability, died in an “undignified manner

 

I read the part "died in an “undignified manner"" and my heart really wrench for that poor girl..

 

Clap clap clap... rotan that disgraceful guy who call himself a man and say he do it cos scare of his wife, till his backside split open big big.

Edited by Cheesey74
  • Praise 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it's fair.

Higher than what defence ask for.

 

good to see that the judge saw the circumstances and decided to up the sentences. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AGC clariication on why not charged with murder.

 

Basically the forensic pathologist diagnosis of cause of death doesn't tie in with a murder charge.

 

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/agc-clarifies-couple-tortured-annie-ee-death-not-charged-murder-030944418.html

To charge them for murder, they must have all the ingredients that constitute the offence. If not, the culprits may be acquitted if reasonable doubts were raised!

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...