Jump to content
Sgcarmart Trusted Brand Showcase - Jack Cars at Katong i12 from 22 to 28 Apr 2024 ×

IBM is about to get hit with a massive reorg and layoffs

Karu

By Karu,
in Lite & EZ

 Share

Recommended Posts

Karu

Karu

6th Gear

Beginning of the end of good times???

 

IBM is expected to go through a massive reorg next month that will reportedly see 26% of its 430,000-strong work force let go, or 111,800 people. If that figure holds true, that would make it far and away the largest corporate layoff event in history, breaking the record previously held by IBM, when it cut 60,000 in 1993.

The problem is a complex mess of bad management – like laying off important people in the middle of a project – to getting sidetracked with pie-in-the-sky ideas like commercializing Watson and failing to adjust to the new era. The "M" in IBM may mean machines, but hardware is less than 10% of its business. Two-thirds is in services, and the services pipeline has dried up.

Why? Well, according to an ex-IBMer I spoke to some time ago, who confirmed what Cringely wrote in his book, IBM is still wedded to services contracts in an age where companies are shutting down their internal data center entirely and moving everything to the cloud. If you don't have a data center, you don't need an IBM service contract to manage it.

That's why IBM grabbed Softlayer, the cloud services provider. It needed to get into the cloud fast because it was behind Microsoft, Google and Amazon. Since the purchase 18 months ago, IBM has put a huge amount of money into SoftLayer and there has been a number of announcements around SoftLayer services.

Cringely said the mainframe and storage areas will see deep cuts, which is pretty stupid considering IBM announced the new Z13 mainframe and hopes it will stimulate sales. That won't be easy when you cut the people who are supposed to sell it. Cutting storage is also foolish, as we are in the era of Big Data and Data Lakes and storage is vital to these concepts.

And you have to wonder what a layoff of 110,000 people will do to the firm. That has to be jarring. I remember an old advertisement from the print days that said "What's worse, getting laid off on a Friday or being told to pick up the slack on the following Monday?" This will be undeniably upsetting to the survivors, who will likely spend time updating their LinkedIn profiles.

The question I have to ask is why isn't Rometty one of the 110k. IBM has seen 11 straight quarters of declining revenue and it's hemorrhaging customers, according to both my source and Cringely. It's becoming apparent she is not up for the job and can't pull the company out of its nose dive.

Cringely said the layoffs will begin next week and by the end of February, all of the employees will be gone. If nothing else, IBM's first quarter numbers will take a monstrous hit from the severance packages for 111,000 employees. To say nothing of what this will do to its customer confidence.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Kb27

Kb27

Supersonic

A lot of layoffs FT is going to flood the market and come looking for a job.

 

If you're holding onto one, better hang on tight.

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hydrocarbon

Hydrocarbon

Turbocharged

A lot of layoffs FT is going to flood the market and come looking for a job.

 

If you're holding onto one, better hang on tight.

 

Even if got secure + stable job, such a tsunami of jobless people will have a huge effect on the economy.

 

It's gonna be a blast!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jman888

Jman888

Moderator

their building in Changi Business Park is huge. Lots of FTs there.

 

 

 

err..... every building in Changi Business Park is huge [laugh][laugh]

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Kezg1

Kezg1

5th Gear

their building in Changi Business Park is huge. Lots of FTs there.

 

 

...some friend 's said is already rename but not officially...Chenai Bussiness Park..LOL

  • Praise 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamesc

Jamesc

Hypersonic

No worries they have a huge anount of experienced in retrenchment.

 

IBM = I've Been Moved.

 

It all becuase of the stupid cloud

 

Where there is cloud there is rain

 

and its raining heavily now.

 

:D

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Vidz

Vidz

6th Gear
(edited)

 

 

...some friend 's said is already rename but not officially...Chenai Bussiness Park..LOL

 

ET FT go home... ? [:p]

Edited by Vidz
Link to post
Share on other sites
Karu

Karu

6th Gear
  • Author

No worries they have a huge anount of experienced in retrenchment.

 

IBM = I've Been Moved.

 

It all becuase of the stupid cloud

 

Where there is cloud there is rain

 

and its raining heavily now.

 

:D

 

So when we talk about cloud, they are actually 'renting' the data from their servers right?

 

If that's the case, sales of server will be hit & 'rental' of these data storage cannot cover cost?

 

Pardon me for these questions... I'm not an IT expert.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Karu

Karu

6th Gear
  • Author

Maybe that's why they have to quickly come out with laws to disallow public drinking after 10:30pm... They knew that there'll be many jobless drinkers...

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Ben5266

Ben5266

Supercharged

 

So when we talk about cloud, they are actually 'renting' the data from their servers right?

 

If that's the case, sales of server will be hit & 'rental' of these data storage cannot cover cost?

 

Pardon me for these questions... I'm not an IT expert.

Key point for cloud is sharing of resources.

Meaning 1000 company is sharing a cluster of servers cpu and the service to managed it.

If old method, 1000 company will need to buy 1000 servers and employ 1 engineer each to manage the server.

With cloud, companies could share the resources.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Volvobrick

Volvobrick

Supersonic

 

So when we talk about cloud, they are actually 'renting' the data from their servers right?

 

If that's the case, sales of server will be hit & 'rental' of these data storage cannot cover cost?

 

Pardon me for these questions... I'm not an IT expert.

 

I think "Cloud" means something you can see but cannot touch....

 

Can see/use the data, cannot touch the servers, as someone else owns and runs it.

 

IT bros - correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Celicar

Celicar

Turbocharged

 

I think "Cloud" means something you can see but cannot touch....

 

Can see/use the data, cannot touch the servers, as someone else owns and runs it.

 

IT bros - correct?

Not IT person too, but somebody has got to own it, so it can be anybody right, including the data owner. Cloud just mean you don't have to bring a storage hardware around, is that right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamesc

Jamesc

Hypersonic

Key point for cloud is sharing of resources.

Meaning 1000 company is sharing a cluster of servers cpu and the service to managed it.

If old method, 1000 company will need to buy 1000 servers and employ 1 engineer each to manage the server.

With cloud, companies could share the resources.

 

Thats exactly right.

 

IBM's model is to tell the 1000 companies,

 

no need to hire the engineer, just outsource to me

 

and I will hire the engineer and manage them for you.

 

With cloud you don't need to buy your own server

 

and house it and manage it, someone else can do it all for you.

 

IBM should have moved into the cloud business earlier

 

and it would have been a great opportunity as a cloud is

 

just a network of servers in many different locations.

 

And IBM makes servers - a lot of them and very bigs one too.

 

:D

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...