Mitsubishi Attrage.

[13177]

Facelift model?

[Jamesc]

9 hours ago, auto1701 said:

 

I must be very young I like it very much. 

[justahumanbeing]

Price will shoot up with this new facelift model?

[minty]

Wonder when will the New Attrage arrive in Singapore. If in the near future then no point getting the current old Attrage if keen on it. Just gotta wait and see.

[minty]

3 minutes ago, justahumanbeing said:

Price will shoot up with this new facelift model?

Hmm seems like only external visual changed so I guess price wise would not differ by alot as compared to the current one. So better to wait and get the New Attrage? The current Attrage looks very old school and outdated. Old Attrage indeed :x

[Ceecookie]

Seems like the same ancient 1.2l engine circa 2003 may be carried over unchanged. Tsk Tsk 

Edited November 19, 2019 by Ceecookie

[Wormee]

On 11/17/2019 at 2:24 PM, minty said:

Looks like a hybrid between the Grand Lancer and the Eclispe. 

[Wormee]

https://m.sgcarmart.com/articles/articleinfo.php?CT=n&AID=22192

[Hachi]

I also liked the design very much. The yellow color looked like 208.

Edited November 19, 2019 by Hachi

[Ragion]

5 hours ago, Wormee said:

Looks like a hybrid between the Grand Lancer and the Eclispe. 

i more prefered to old design, i love it~

anyway, just received my eyelids from philippines seller, it look more perfect now~ 😎

[Angcheek]

21 hours ago, Jamesc said:

 

 

 

Shouldnt this be in Thailand Talk  .............. 

[ferrytales]

But still the same car with a crappy powerless engine and drive train. 

Good point A to point B car in sg regardless for the price. 

[auto1701]

2 hours ago, ferrytales said:

But still the same car with a crappy powerless engine and drive train. 

Good point A to point B car in sg regardless for the price. 

Yes, I do find the engine lacking but then, this car has always been marketed as a cheap Point A to Point B. Makes no sense to increase the engine size and move out of this segment to compete with other 1.3 or 1.5l cars. What they did was gave the car and updated look to be aligned to their current Mistubishi design similar to Kia's Tiger Lip for their entire range. By the way, fascinated to learn that the new model will come with auto-dimming rear view mirror. 🙂

 

[auto1701]

On 11/19/2019 at 4:28 PM, Ragion said:

i more prefered to old design, i love it~

anyway, just received my eyelids from philippines seller, it look more perfect now~ 😎

I like the older design too! But I prefer all stock and no mods. The new design would probably appeal to those youngers who can't afford a sports variant but appreciate that their car looks like one even if don't perform likewise! 🙂

[ferrytales]

9 hours ago, auto1701 said:

Yes, I do find the engine lacking but then, this car has always been marketed as a cheap Point A to Point B. Makes no sense to increase the engine size and move out of this segment to compete with other 1.3 or 1.5l cars. What they did was gave the car and updated look to be aligned to their current Mistubishi design similar to Kia's Tiger Lip for their entire range. By the way, fascinated to learn that the new model will come with auto-dimming rear view mirror. 🙂

 

But if fellow competitors like accent has a 1.4 engine, avante basic with 1.6 going for maybe just a few k more.

It's a no brainer. Accent is a direct competitor with attrage I believe since the pricing is really close too, engine is better and more refined. 

[auto1701]

13 hours ago, ferrytales said:

But if fellow competitors like accent has a 1.4 engine, avante basic with 1.6 going for maybe just a few k more.

It's a no brainer. Accent is a direct competitor with attrage I believe since the pricing is really close too, engine is better and more refined. 

Actually I shortlisted previously to the Accent, Note and Attrage. The Accent has some good points like better comfort, more premium but my top requirements was lowest cost and FC. The Accent was about $4K - $5K more, too much for someone as price-sensitive as me. As for FC, the Accent's 14km/l vs Attrage 20km/l which means the latter wins. I have 4 colleagues at the same workplace and living near each other. One drove an Accent while the other 3 drove Attrages. The Accent reported 11-12km/l while the Attrages reported average of about 18-19km/l. Hence based on my criteria, the Attrage won the "tender" . It helped that C&C offered 5 year free servicing too. 🙂 

[justahumanbeing]

On 11/21/2019 at 9:38 PM, auto1701 said:

Actually I shortlisted previously to the Accent, Note and Attrage. The Accent has some good points like better comfort, more premium but my top requirements was lowest cost and FC. The Accent was about $4K - $5K more, too much for someone as price-sensitive as me. As for FC, the Accent's 14km/l vs Attrage 20km/l which means the latter wins. I have 4 colleagues at the same workplace and living near each other. One drove an Accent while the other 3 drove Attrages. The Accent reported 11-12km/l while the Attrages reported average of about 18-19km/l. Hence based on my criteria, the Attrage won the "tender" . It helped that C&C offered 5 year free servicing too. 🙂 

5 years free servicing? I thought C&C only gives servicing credits. 

[Ragion]

On 11/20/2019 at 10:34 PM, auto1701 said:

I like the older design too! But I prefer all stock and no mods. The new design would probably appeal to those youngers who can't afford a sports variant but appreciate that their car looks like one even if don't perform likewise! 🙂

yes i agreed your point, actually i'm one of the younger that you mentioned to, hahaha.

by the way, if attrage 1.2 + supercharge + 5at it would be perfect for me~