Chelzea Clutched December 11, 2015 Share December 11, 2015 hope MOH has controls in place to prevent reoccurence ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weez911 Supersonic March 17, 2016 Share March 17, 2016 (edited) Punishment a little soft considering 8 patients died and 25 were infected? http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hepatitis-c-outbreak/2611224.html Hepatitis C outbreak: Disciplinary action taken against MOH, SGH staff For 12 staff in leadership positions, Singapore General Hospital says disciplinary sanctions meted out include stern warnings and financial penalties for gaps in their roles in managing the outbreak or in infection control. SINGAPORE: The Singapore General Hospital (SGH) on Thursday (Mar 17) announced it had meted out disciplinary sanctions to 12 staff in leadership positions, following the Hepatitis C outbreak during last April to June. Four Ministry of Health senior officers were also disciplined. In a press release, the hospital said the disciplinary actions against 12 staff in leadership positions, including senior SGH management, were stern warnings and financial penalties for gaps in their roles in managing the outbreak or in infection control. "The affected staff have accepted the penalties," it added. The Ministry of Health said in a separate press release that four MOH officers holding Director-level or equivalent roles were also disciplined for "their failure to intervene early and to ensure the infectious disease notification and reporting system was effective and rigorous". The sanctions included warnings, stern warnings and financial penalties. "The four officers have accepted the outcomes," MOH said. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IN PLACE SGH said following the release of the Independent Review Committee's (IRC) investigation, Chairman of the SingHealth Board of Directors Peter Seah had appointed a Human Resource (HR) Panel to examine the roles, responsibilities and actions of key SGH staff to assess if disciplinary actions need to be taken. The Panel carefully examined the roles and responsibilities of key SGH staff, taking into account the findings and conclusions of the IRC report. Interview sessions were conducted with the key staff involved to understand their perspectives and rationale for decisions made and/or actions taken, the hospital said. The Panel also made wide-ranging observations and recommendations to further strengthen the hospital’s infection control and disease outbreak surveillance and management mechanisms. Ongoing steps taken to improve current infection control measures include: Instituting regular, thorough cleaning and disinfection of potentially contaminated surfaces, with clearer roles and responsibilities for who should undertake the cleaning Introducing enhanced education and training programmes, including curriculum for all new staff Improving supervision and monitoring of practices such as hand hygiene practices Use of needle-less connectors hospital-wide The hospital said it has started an enhanced hospital-wide infection control education and training programme, with annual online competency assessment. Regular audits will be conducted to ensure compliance, it added. In addition to cross-institutional audits within SingHealth, SGH also engaged Joint Commission International (JCI) consultants to review the Renal Unit’s clinical processes, including renal transplant and infection control practices, the hospital said. "The hospital will make full use of the suggestions and recommendations by JCI consultants in its continuing efforts to enhance practices," it said. - CNA/kk Edited March 17, 2016 by Weez911 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusje Supersonic March 17, 2016 Share March 17, 2016 The fellow who didn't inform the public till after the elections no punishment ah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadX Moderator March 17, 2016 Share March 17, 2016 Punishment a little soft considering 8 patients died and 25 were infected? http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hepatitis-c-outbreak/2611224.html Hepatitis C outbreak: Disciplinary action taken against MOH, SGH staff For 12 staff in leadership positions, Singapore General Hospital says disciplinary sanctions meted out include stern warnings and financial penalties for gaps in their roles in managing the outbreak or in infection control. 3-17-2016 4-19-57 PM.png SINGAPORE: The Singapore General Hospital (SGH) on Thursday (Mar 17) announced it had meted out disciplinary sanctions to 12 staff in leadership positions, following the Hepatitis C outbreak during last April to June. Four Ministry of Health senior officers were also disciplined. In a press release, the hospital said the disciplinary actions against 12 staff in leadership positions, including senior SGH management, were stern warnings and financial penalties for gaps in their roles in managing the outbreak or in infection control. "The affected staff have accepted the penalties," it added. The Ministry of Health said in a separate press release that four MOH officers holding Director-level or equivalent roles were also disciplined for "their failure to intervene early and to ensure the infectious disease notification and reporting system was effective and rigorous". The sanctions included warnings, stern warnings and financial penalties. "The four officers have accepted the outcomes," MOH said. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IN PLACE SGH said following the release of the Independent Review Committee's (IRC) investigation, Chairman of the SingHealth Board of Directors Peter Seah had appointed a Human Resource (HR) Panel to examine the roles, responsibilities and actions of key SGH staff to assess if disciplinary actions need to be taken. The Panel carefully examined the roles and responsibilities of key SGH staff, taking into account the findings and conclusions of the IRC report. Interview sessions were conducted with the key staff involved to understand their perspectives and rationale for decisions made and/or actions taken, the hospital said. The Panel also made wide-ranging observations and recommendations to further strengthen the hospitalâs infection control and disease outbreak surveillance and management mechanisms. Ongoing steps taken to improve current infection control measures include: Instituting regular, thorough cleaning and disinfection of potentially contaminated surfaces, with clearer roles and responsibilities for who should undertake the cleaning Introducing enhanced education and training programmes, including curriculum for all new staff Improving supervision and monitoring of practices such as hand hygiene practices Use of needle-less connectors hospital-wide The hospital said it has started an enhanced hospital-wide infection control education and training programme, with annual online competency assessment. Regular audits will be conducted to ensure compliance, it added. In addition to cross-institutional audits within SingHealth, SGH also engaged Joint Commission International (JCI) consultants to review the Renal Unitâs clinical processes, including renal transplant and infection control practices, the hospital said. "The hospital will make full use of the suggestions and recommendations by JCI consultants in its continuing efforts to enhance practices," it said. - CNA/kk Yup When we meet I'll give a hint of what I believe is the most plausible explanation 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myxilplix Turbocharged March 17, 2016 Share March 17, 2016 The fellow who didn't inform the public till after the elections no punishment ah? Shhh. people already kena punishment. Let's move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weez911 Supersonic March 17, 2016 Share March 17, 2016 The fellow who didn't inform the public till after the elections no punishment ah? Huh simi punishment? At most only kena "stern warning" and "financial penalties"... 1k? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Othello Supersonic March 17, 2016 Share March 17, 2016 stern warning ? financial penalty ? no bonus this year, OK. Next year give you back Where is Hui-ge ??? Shhh. people already kena punishment. Let's move on. you're damn right about the 8 who have moved on 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Hypersonic March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 Howcome this gross act of negligence MOH did not bring the guilty to court? Ownself discipline ownself can liao? Punishment a little soft considering 8 patients died and 25 were infected? http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hepatitis-c-outbreak/2611224.html Hepatitis C outbreak: Disciplinary action taken against MOH, SGH staff For 12 staff in leadership positions, Singapore General Hospital says disciplinary sanctions meted out include stern warnings and financial penalties for gaps in their roles in managing the outbreak or in infection control. 3-17-2016 4-19-57 PM.png SINGAPORE: The Singapore General Hospital (SGH) on Thursday (Mar 17) announced it had meted out disciplinary sanctions to 12 staff in leadership positions, following the Hepatitis C outbreak during last April to June. Four Ministry of Health senior officers were also disciplined. In a press release, the hospital said the disciplinary actions against 12 staff in leadership positions, including senior SGH management, were stern warnings and financial penalties for gaps in their roles in managing the outbreak or in infection control. "The affected staff have accepted the penalties," it added. The Ministry of Health said in a separate press release that four MOH officers holding Director-level or equivalent roles were also disciplined for "their failure to intervene early and to ensure the infectious disease notification and reporting system was effective and rigorous". The sanctions included warnings, stern warnings and financial penalties. "The four officers have accepted the outcomes," MOH said. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IN PLACE SGH said following the release of the Independent Review Committee's (IRC) investigation, Chairman of the SingHealth Board of Directors Peter Seah had appointed a Human Resource (HR) Panel to examine the roles, responsibilities and actions of key SGH staff to assess if disciplinary actions need to be taken. The Panel carefully examined the roles and responsibilities of key SGH staff, taking into account the findings and conclusions of the IRC report. Interview sessions were conducted with the key staff involved to understand their perspectives and rationale for decisions made and/or actions taken, the hospital said. The Panel also made wide-ranging observations and recommendations to further strengthen the hospital’s infection control and disease outbreak surveillance and management mechanisms. Ongoing steps taken to improve current infection control measures include: The hospital said it has started an enhanced hospital-wide infection control education and training programme, with annual online competency assessment. Regular audits will be conducted to ensure compliance, it added. Instituting regular, thorough cleaning and disinfection of potentially contaminated surfaces, with clearer roles and responsibilities for who should undertake the cleaning Introducing enhanced education and training programmes, including curriculum for all new staff Improving supervision and monitoring of practices such as hand hygiene practices Use of needle-less connectors hospital-wide In addition to cross-institutional audits within SingHealth, SGH also engaged Joint Commission International (JCI) consultants to review the Renal Unit’s clinical processes, including renal transplant and infection control practices, the hospital said. "The hospital will make full use of the suggestions and recommendations by JCI consultants in its continuing efforts to enhance practices," it said. - CNA/kk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qpik Supercharged March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 Wah all those Acts under Statutes that r applicable 2 hospital still par geh or not?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktglfc Hypersonic March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 Hope they have improved the system, SOPs, etc... If happen again, pls sack those responsible including the TOP TOP ppl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusje Supersonic March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 So is that a hospital act that prevents the dead patients' families from suing the hospital or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadX Moderator March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 So is that a hospital act that prevents the dead patients' families from suing the hospital or not? i thot for a while i saw only up to 'patients'... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little_prince Supersonic March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 i thought no root cause identified yet? if no fault found then why are people punished? So is that a hospital act that prevents the dead patients' families from suing the hospital or not? hospital is considered stat board? same protection as SAF? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qpik Supercharged March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 So is that a hospital act that prevents the dead patients' families from suing the hospital or not?Hmm...i not trained but I do know we hv an Infectious Diseases Act. Whether the deceased families' lawyer can use it to sue or not, i dono Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff69 Hypersonic March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 you get what you vote for . 1 month salary for 1 life 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angcheek Hypersonic March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 i thot for a while i saw only up to 'patients'... Zen zen i have no patience for them 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qpik Supercharged March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 i thought no root cause identified yet? if no fault found then why are people punished? hospital is considered stat board? same protection as SAF? WSH Act iirc exemption applied to SAF. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qpik Supercharged March 18, 2016 Share March 18, 2016 i thot for a while i saw only up to 'patients'... I waitg 4 u to elaborate...got any Act that protect/prevent them fm being sued? ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
M'sian (semi-female) doctor found guilty of sexually assaulting 4 (male) patients in NZ has been deported
M'sian (semi-female) doctor found guilty of sexually assaulting 4 (male) patients in NZ has been deported
Should coma patients live or die?
Should coma patients live or die?
World's first human case of rat disease hepatitis E
World's first human case of rat disease hepatitis E
NUH recalls 178 patients for TB test
NUH recalls 178 patients for TB test
Ugly behaviour from patients and their families
Ugly behaviour from patients and their families
Hepatitis C screening
Hepatitis C screening
Chinese hospital's 'sex ward' helps couples make babies
Chinese hospital's 'sex ward' helps couples make babies