Jump to content

2017 Skoda Karoq


Carbon82
 Share

Recommended Posts

Style trim is about 10k higher than Ambition in cost price (before profit)

 

 

 

Basic cost of ambition

 

22672(OMV) X 2.27 + 2672 X 0.4(Tier OMV tax) + 32000(COE)

= 84,534

 

 

Basic cost of Style

26324(OMV) X 2.27 + 6324 X 0.4(Tier OMV tax) + 32000(COE)

= 94,285

 

Thank you for the detailed workout! So i not too far off!  [:p]

 

I still waiting for some insider view on the actual OMV paid to principle.

 

BTW it is against the law for not declaring the actual OMV wor.. like some former PI did.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the detailed workout! So i not too far off!  [:p]

 

I still waiting for some insider view on the actual OMV paid to principle.

 

BTW it is against the law for not declaring the actual OMV wor.. like some former PI did.

 

OMV is on LTA website.  I used Oct OMV in the calculation.  However, it does varies a bit from month to month

 

 

https://www.onemotoring.com.sg/content/onemotoring/en/lta_information_guidelines/buy_a_new_vehicle/open_market_value.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMV is on LTA website.  I used Oct OMV in the calculation.  However, it does varies a bit from month to month

 

 

https://www.onemotoring.com.sg/content/onemotoring/en/lta_information_guidelines/buy_a_new_vehicle/open_market_value.html

 

Yup fluctuation is understandable due to say currency exchange n such

 

BUT under declaring is another thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Style trim is about 10k higher than Ambition in cost price (before profit)

 

 

 

Basic cost of ambition

 

22672(OMV) X 2.27 + 2672 X 0.4(Tier OMV tax) + 32000(COE)

= 84,534

 

 

Basic cost of Style

26324(OMV) X 2.27 + 6324 X 0.4(Tier OMV tax) + 32000(COE)

= 94,285

As you can see, Skoda AD made insane amount of profit for each car... This is expected since they are expected to be tiny vol seller... 

 

And their warranty period is so miserable by today's standard... 5yrs, 100000km warranty only (which I believe comes with lots of ** in disclaimers) , and 3 free svcs instead of the industry norm 3 or 5 yrs. 

 

三年无发市, 发市顶三年.... read this in Cantonese and you know what I mean... 

 

This is why PI cars often offers better value for money.  

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As you can see, Skoda AD made insane amount of profit for each car... This is expected since they are expected to be tiny vol seller...

 

And their warranty period is so miserable by today's standard... 5yrs, 100000km warranty only (which I believe comes with lots of ** in disclaimers) , and 3 free svcs instead of the industry norm 3 or 5 yrs.

 

ä¸å¹´æ åå¸, åå¸é¡¶ä¸å¹´.... read this in Cantonese and you know what I mean...

 

This is why PI cars often offers better value for money.

That why I say over is price. 30k profit is too much. Anyway, there is PI and best part is even PI is cover by Skoda service center for 3 years. Just maybe you need to go there for 3 years servicing
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Style trim is about 10k higher than Ambition in cost price (before profit)

 

 

 

Basic cost of ambition

 

22672(OMV) X 2.27 + 2672 X 0.4(Tier OMV tax) + 32000(COE)

= 84,534

 

 

Basic cost of Style

26324(OMV) X 2.27 + 6324 X 0.4(Tier OMV tax) + 32000(COE)

= 94,285

So cost price at 84k selling at 112k. Which is 33% premium.

 

If they are sincere to improve their branding volume, they could have sold at 100k without lost too. Mazda is different scenario as it brand has already been established here before the new AD took over

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the past few AD, they are small fly. Now is VW. Just like Past Mazda AD sell their car cheaper. After change to The new Conti car seller AD, price is not as attractive as before.

 

To add on, this car omv is 23/24k and 27/28k respectively, how cheap can they sell?

Before the arrival of this AD, all superb come with premium speaker. Now they divided into few trim and only the L&K trim come with it. Why?

The canton system does not sound great. Better than stock perhaps, but not great Edited by Sdf4786k
Link to post
Share on other sites

The canton system does not sound great. Better than stock perhaps, but not great

I thought Canton is one of the branded AV brands on the market?

 

Prob made in Guangzhou , hence the name [laugh]

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Canton is one of the branded AV brands on the market?

 

Prob made in Guangzhou , hence the name [laugh]

Probably he is comparing with after market speaker rather than stock speaker. For sound noob like me and do not want to spend addition time and cost for ICE upgrade, i will rather still to the best the stock can offer
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

So cost price at 84k selling at 112k. Which is 33% premium.

 

If they are sincere to improve their branding volume, they could have sold at 100k without lost too. Mazda is different scenario as it brand has already been established here before the new AD took over

 

Volvo xc40 lagi worse, omv about 25k, selling 160k!

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Was at Northpoint City just now so took a quick look at the Karoq. Rear legroom quite decent, but agree the upholstry seats are a turn-off.

 

Looks like the thigh support is quite poor, with a shortened seat bench.

 

Most people just focus on the "leg-room" but dont realise that thigh support as in the width of the seat bench also matters in overall space. I rather have less "leg room" but more thigh support than the other way round. 

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Volvo xc40 lagi worse, omv about 25k, selling 160k!

Huh? An india car brand now still think high & mighty about itself?

Was at Northpoint City just now so took a quick look at the Karoq. Rear legroom quite decent, but agree the upholstry seats are a turn-off.

That is why i question why would they want to turn off buyer with the basic trim. They should display what is the best it could offer to catch the attention 1st.
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh? An india car brand now still think high & mighty about itself?

That is why i question why would they want to turn off buyer with the basic trim. They should display what is the best it could offer to catch the attention 1st.

 Volvo india car brand?

 

I thought owned by Geely, which is Chinese?

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Volvo india car brand?

 

I thought owned by Geely, which is Chinese?

He prob mixed up with Land Rover/ Jaguar which is owned by Tata(India).

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone bought Skoda Karoq during the Car Motorshow last weekend? I heard quite good pricing and also some useful freebies?

 

Questions:

 

1. Ambition variant comes with leather seat or fabric?

 

2. Any one test drive this already? Or owned one, so far how is the experience?

 

Thanks.

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...