Jump to content

Multimillion-Dollar Civil Suits against 3 Workers’ Party MPs


Carbon82
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/13/2019 at 10:31 AM, Hamburger said:

Took a quote from sibling also kana sued.

 

This is new low for me.

So is the 1MDB case. The author bo tai ji!

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2018 at 2:45 PM, Yewheng said:

Very rubbish, when wp win the grc. What pap do? Try to make it as difficult for wp as possible. What system took over but wp need to ownself set up the system. Why can't pap just transfer to them so that it will not incur too much additional expenses? These additional expenses end up will pass down to public who foot the bill.

 

So this shows one thing, they only care for themselves not for the intrest of the people. It's like so wp took over already, so they need to ownself setup system, ours too bad, we will not transfer to them for transition. So selfish thinking.

 

And the thing is, no one voice this out in parliament to set law to ensure when any of the party that win the seat, those critical system need to pass down accordingly to ensure smooth transition and also to not to incur addition expenses to set up new system (which could easily be transferred over). Well..

Exactly. Everything "they" do is not for the well being of the people, but are only focused on one thing "to fix them". Because they are voted out, they will fix "all" together. Not to mentioned the amount wasted just to fix "them" which could be put in better use. Even give me a dollar more in their whatever bonus i also happy.

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

wah...can my tc ownself civil suit ownself for losing $$ in lehman mini bonds?

then pay the damages and losses back to the tc sinking fund...

easy  case....no need hire DS

🤣

  • Praise 2
  • Haha! 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Enye said:

wah...can my tc ownself civil suit ownself for losing $$ in lehman mini bonds?

then pay the damages and losses back to the tc sinking fund...

easy  case....no need hire DS

🤣

tat was wat I thought too....did they announce and get our approval to invest the sinking funds.......many more millions were lost.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Yewheng said:

If that's the case, then 880k bin centre, lehmon brother bond case and many more need to be brind to court, instead of ministers just give some reasons and then push it aside and not sueing anyone. 

 

Cant be, opposition slightest mistake, get magnified and then charged to court. Those under government service and or own party mistake, come out and give statement that convey its should have done better and what had been done to improve after that and then close case. 

 

Need to be fair, if want to go by slightest mistake go court then it should apply to all party and government organisations. Not just opposition party only. 

 

If don't want sue own party and or government organisations for slightest mistake, then it should also be applied fairly to opposition party too. 

 

Correct? 

not forgetting year after year, AGO audit on the various ministries......

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Fu11thr0tt1e said:

Forgive and forget! 🙄

never do anything wrong, what's there to forgive?

 

but yes, please forget. esp during election.

Edited by Kusje
  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pa-ps-divisive-approach-to-politics-is-polarising-singapore-society-pritam-singh-101043186.html

 

Pritam Singh spoken..

 

Seriously why need to have PA involved when it is under the whichever party in charge of the constituency, be it PAP or WP or any other opposition party.. By right PA should not have more say then MP as PA are not voted by the citizens. But look, how come PA can have so much power and can influence in decisions making? Haiz.. 

So PA is bigger then MP? PA is bigger then HDB? PA is bigger then town council and etc? 

Government should stop PA from lobbying.. 

Edited by Yewheng
  • Praise 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2019 at 6:56 PM, Yewheng said:

If that's the case, then 880k bin centre, lehmon brother bond case and many more need to be brind to court, instead of ministers just give some reasons and then push it aside and not sueing anyone. 

 

Cant be, opposition slightest mistake, get magnified and then charged to court. Those under government service and or own party mistake, come out and give statement that convey its should have done better and what had been done to improve after that and then close case. 

 

Need to be fair, if want to go by slightest mistake go court then it should apply to all party and government organisations. Not just opposition party only. 

 

If don't want sue own party and or government organisations for slightest mistake, then it should also be applied fairly to opposition party too. 

 

Correct? 

If u know what I mean...

7B66E417-4111-4FE3-9E84-367296F1CC9B.gif

  • Praise 3
  • Haha! 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder now imagine if got foreign journalist write article lambasting WP, will mr sham come out and say stop the foreign interference? After all he did say a few weeks back that if got foreign press write bad things about us and engage in interference he will take action?

Edited by Kyrios
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2019 at 6:56 PM, Yewheng said:

If that's the case, then 880k bin centre, lehmon brother bond case and many more need to be brind to court, instead of ministers just give some reasons and then push it aside and not sueing anyone. 

Cant be, opposition slightest mistake, get magnified and then charged to court. Those under government service and or own party mistake, come out and give statement that convey its should have done better and what had been done to improve after that and then close case. 

Need to be fair, if want to go by slightest mistake go court then it should apply to all party and government organisations. Not just opposition party only. 

If don't want sue own party and or government organisations for slightest mistake, then it should also be applied fairly to opposition party too. 

Correct? 

Possibly one of the most unbiased postings so far...you da man YH...

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kyrios said:

I wonder now imagine if got foreign journalist write article lambasting WP, will mr sham come out and say stop the foreign interference? After all he did say a few weeks back that if got foreign press write bad things about us and engage in interference he will take action?

Just 2 weeks back on China national day.. he criticised hk leaders for what's going on... lucky China never shoot back openly. 

So foreign interference isn't the problem.. as long as it's not criticism of the pap.

  • Praise 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Yewheng said:

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pa-ps-divisive-approach-to-politics-is-polarising-singapore-society-pritam-singh-101043186.html

 

Pritam Singh spoken..

 

Seriously why need to have PA involved when it is under the whichever party in charge of the constituency, be it PAP or WP or any other opposition party.. By right PA should not have more say then MP as PA are not voted by the citizens. But look, how come PA can have so much power and can influence in decisions making? Haiz.. 

So PA is bigger then MP? PA is bigger then HDB? PA is bigger then town council and etc? 

Government should stop PA from lobbying.. 

 

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/peoples-association-not-politicised-chan-chun-sing

 

Some think he is PM material... I shudder at the thought.. give him power and true colours who'l come. 

 

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

MIW would want all to believe that PA is a standalone entity,  just like how a SE is more appropriate than a PE.

 

 

 

 

what was the favourite phrase use by mobsters in HK?

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is really a problem being PA that has more say then an MP.

 

1st, Coz PA is not voted by people of that constituency, so how can PA have more say then of the MP? 

 

Secondly, by giving PA a lot of power, these people on top somehow because want to put a good books to their boss, so end up maybe blinded because of that and approved or put in cases based on what that think is good for bosses to see. However bosses may not necessary want to go in that direction. So end up how? People in that constituency may get slight inconvenience, like the Pritam Singh example on the barrier access free ramp which by right just need a few months to complete, end up it took 7 years. 

 

So haiz.. 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...