Wt_know Supersonic September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 (edited) 1 minute ago, inlinesix said: Someone will tell you off. She did not plea guilty 😂 in angmoh saying is .... in ah beng saying is "you didn't tell but you didn't ask ..." when buy used car from ah beng dealer ... lol Edited September 26, 2021 by Wt_know ↡ Advertisement 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturtles 6th Gear September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 My opinion, she hid information, but if she is guilty, shouldn’t Canada deliver a guilty verdict? Which is what mislead investigators meant. This whole case is just to achieve political aims, without true consideration of the underlying actions. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, Wt_know said: in angmoh saying is .... in ah beng saying is "you didn't tell but you didn't ask ..." when buy used car from ah beng dealer ... lol 😂 He even quote CGTN news that Meng did not plea guilty le. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Sturtles said: My opinion, she hid information, but if she is guilty, shouldn’t Canada deliver a guilty verdict? Which is what mislead investigators meant. This whole case is just to achieve political aims, without true consideration of the underlying actions. Canada arrest her under US extradition request. It is up to US to provide the required evidence for the extradition Edited September 26, 2021 by inlinesix 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturtles 6th Gear September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 Just now, inlinesix said: Canada arrest her under US extradition arrest. There was clear case that she misled HSBC into believing Skycom is unrelated to HW. Definitely believe HW sold restricted products to Iran while they are under sanction. I just can't fathom, why if she is guilty, she is not convicted. Was it under a technicality so had to be released, or she is not considered to have committed an offence worthy of 3 years of house arrest? The West does not have ISA, so infringement of such personal rights is baffling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 Just now, Sturtles said: Definitely believe HW sold restricted products to Iran while they are under sanction. I just can't fathom, why if she is guilty, she is not convicted. Was it under a technicality so had to be released, or she is not considered to have committed an offence worthy of 3 years of house arrest? The West does not have ISA, so infringement of such personal rights is baffling. The conditional release is based on plea bargain. It will be interesting which side initiated this move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturtles 6th Gear September 26, 2021 Share September 26, 2021 6 minutes ago, inlinesix said: The conditional release is based on plea bargain. It will be interesting which side initiated this move. Release with Admission of guilt makes sense, and maybe she traded some secrets for it. However, she was released without admission of guilt, and only admit to misleading/hiding info that makes it difficult for investigators to do their work, which ultimately should also deliver a verdict if she was guilty in the primary crime, or not guilty to the primary crime which is the current case now Eg. I detain you because I suspect you are a murderer, and question you where you were on Sunday night ( which was at a Geylang having a good time), and you lied you were with your friend. In the end, the investigators found out you lied, but also not guilty of the primary charge - Murder. This is what I see with Meng's case. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falc 3rd Gear September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 22 hours ago, Beregond said: To me meng and the 2 michaels are politicals victim. Do u want to see what the 2 michaels are being charge of?? Its ok if u dun agree with me on this. totally fine with me Its ok also if u feel USA win this round against china. fine with me also Its perfectly ok with me also if u feel the conclusion of this meng cases is an embarrassment for china not usa. I totally respect your POV and not going to debate with u on that. enjoy your weekend and dun take thing too hard 😆 Ya, it is quite pointless when there is no agreement of the facts. You draw your conclusion based on how you see your own facts and this is no forum of fact finding. lol 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falc 3rd Gear September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 15 hours ago, Sosaria said: So will more people there now chiong Huawei stores to snatch up their phones? Like the good fortune that fell on Erke when the sports brand donated a large sum of money for flood relief? Or will PRCs still stubbornly queue up for iPhone 13? Would a poll of MCFers provide an answer? 😛 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beregond Supersonic September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Falc said: Ya, it is quite pointless when there is no agreement of the facts. You draw your conclusion based on how you see your own facts and this is no forum of fact finding. lol I alway agree to disagree. But no matter what there is 1 clear fact we must agree on. Meng escape from USA clutches😆 Edited September 27, 2021 by Beregond Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wt_know Supersonic September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 (edited) prc will sell kidney to buy a NEW phone ... no need PhD to guess it's an iPhone and no one sell any organ to buy Huawei ... Edited September 27, 2021 by Wt_know 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falc 3rd Gear September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 12 hours ago, Sturtles said: My opinion, she hid information, but if she is guilty, shouldn’t Canada deliver a guilty verdict? Which is what mislead investigators meant. This whole case is just to achieve political aims, without true consideration of the underlying actions. Don't be too quick to draw this conclusion. There is a political dimension, yes, but also wrongdoing under the law, US laws in this instance. She's charged under US law not under Canadian law; the Canadian courts were deciding whether she could be sent to US to stand trial (she's not quilty before being tried) because she challenged that Canada could send her to US. Democractic countries abide by due process of their law. People don't just mysteriously disappear and more mysteriously re-appear in some jail based on a guilty sentence. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falc 3rd Gear September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 6 minutes ago, Beregond said: I alway agree to disagree. But no matter what there is 1 clear fact we must agree on. Meng escape from USA clutches😆 Yes, she's given a second chance under the law. But if she flouted the terms of her bargain and gone to the West or even SG (it seems SG has extradiction treaty with US but not China), she could still be arrested, extradicted and charged. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wt_know Supersonic September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Falc said: Yes, she's given a second chance under the law. But if she flouted the terms of her bargain and gone to the West or even SG (it seems SG has extradiction treaty with US but not China), she could still be arrested, extradicted and charged. just stay in PRC until 1 Dec 2022 ... to clear all future charges ... Edited September 27, 2021 by Wt_know 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beregond Supersonic September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 (edited) just read this news damn funny canada and usa was trying very hard to deny that the release of the 2 michaels got anyhing to do with meng release. but china purposely refuse to wayang and release the 2 michaels immediately, and indirectly telling every 1 its part of the deal. lmao😆 https://www.channelnewsasia.com/world/canada-china-relations-normalisation-huawei-meng-foreign-minister-garneau-2203551 Canadian Ambassador to the United States Kirsten Hillman denied Washington had made the release of Kovrig and Spavor a condition for the resolution of the charges against Meng. "Absolutely not. The DPA and the resolution of the charges against Ms Meng was a completely independent process, and it was proceeding as it did," Hillman told Canadian broadcaster CTV. Garneau also said he did not think the timing of the men's return had anything to do with that of the federal election. "I think it just worked out that way." Edited September 27, 2021 by Beregond 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 9 minutes ago, Wt_know said: just stay in PRC until 1 Dec 2022 ... to clear all future charges ... That means she will be separated from her family for more than 1 year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falc 3rd Gear September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 13 minutes ago, Wt_know said: just stay in PRC until 1 Dec 2022 ... to clear all future charges ... The exact terms of her bargain made known already? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturtles 6th Gear September 27, 2021 Share September 27, 2021 12 minutes ago, Falc said: Don't be too quick to draw this conclusion. There is a political dimension, yes, but also wrongdoing under the law, US laws in this instance. She's charged under US law not under Canadian law; the Canadian courts were deciding whether she could be sent to US to stand trial (she's not quilty before being tried) because she challenged that Canada could send her to US. Democractic countries abide by due process of their law. People don't just mysteriously disappear and more mysteriously re-appear in some jail based on a guilty sentence. Your explanation is the clearest amongst those guilty/not-guilty verdict arguments. To bring forth the case, or not to, rests on the political masters. It could not be that US has no sufficient evidence, while requesting house arrest of a foreign citizen not within its soil, for the past 3 years and needs another year to gather more standing to press charges. Everything hereafter is just a show circus for internal media and political chip generation. ↡ Advertisement 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Samsung and Huawei crush Apple's smartphone global share
Samsung and Huawei crush Apple's smartphone global share
US blacklists Huawei & affiliates
US blacklists Huawei & affiliates
Huawei Mate 20 Pro / Leica Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro / Leica Camera
Huawei unveils Mate 50 phone that links with China's own GPS system
Huawei unveils Mate 50 phone that links with China's own GPS system
2021 Seres SF5 by Huawei
2021 Seres SF5 by Huawei
Xiaomi designated a 'Communist Chinese military company' by U.S. government
Xiaomi designated a 'Communist Chinese military company' by U.S. government
Lim Tean arrested
Lim Tean arrested
Huawei partners with sgCarMart in Petal Search 'Nearby' Car Category
Huawei partners with sgCarMart in Petal Search 'Nearby' Car Category