Heartlander Turbocharged April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 post-2854-0-86704800-1554126029_thumb.jpg IMO, the first row of example is somewhat arbitrary. Who decides what constitutes "to teach him a lesson" and what is "with the intention to warn people"? For the Fuel10 case, it could be argued that the poster want to warn other pump attendants of an alleged scammer hitting petrol kiosks, instead of teaching the scammer a lesson. How do we even draw the line? From the limited info, the key point seems to be personal information cannot suka suka post. If no personal contact, then no problem. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 still can mention @enye 's 750k or not? need to pester him for long waited roast goose 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 there are people who share funny video of someone doing funny thing, just like the recent one on mrt. then there are people who go all out csi the person id, work place, social media, etc. i would say the second person gets heavier penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueray Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 still can mention @enye 's 750k or not? need to pester him for long waited roast goose so long as not "teach him a lesson", "threaten", "attack" can already .... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enye Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 still can mention @enye 's 750k or not? need to pester him for long waited roast goose wah....yandao towkay you disappeared so long come back only suan me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopites Supersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 Ultimately, whether a doxxing offence is made out depends on the context within which the identity information is published. The courts will interpret the law and decide each case based on its own facts. Source: Ministry of Law æ³åºè¯´äºç®. They are the "way", the "truth" and the... [insert your own descriptive] law minister? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueray Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 post-2854-0-86704800-1554126029_thumb.jpg IMO, the first row of example is somewhat arbitrary. Who decides what constitutes "to teach him a lesson" and what is "with the intention to warn people"? For the Fuel10 case, it could be argued that the poster want to warn other pump attendants of an alleged scammer hitting petrol kiosks, instead of teaching the scammer a lesson. How do we even draw the line? yes, still somewhat vague and subjective, intentionally so or not I am not sure. my $0.02 is that this law will be applied only in clear cut and extreme incidents. its now put in place so that it can be used as and when required. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopites Supersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 (edited) hope so. social media cannot administer it own social justice than what is a social media in a cyber world. informative and referencing only? on one hand pushing toward a "smart" nation. On the other hand not trusting its citizen to be "smart" in filtering out unwanted and undesired news. Edited April 2, 2019 by Kopites Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 wah....yandao towkay you disappeared so long come back only suan me no suan...no doxxing....doting 都来不及 so long as not "teach him a lesson", "threaten", "attack" can already .... depending tolerance level...buay loon...then :x 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 post-2854-0-86704800-1554126029_thumb.jpg IMO, the first row of example is somewhat arbitrary. Who decides what constitutes "to teach him a lesson" and what is "with the intention to warn people"? For the Fuel10 case, it could be argued that the poster want to warn other pump attendants of an alleged scammer hitting petrol kiosks, instead of teaching the scammer a lesson. How do we even draw the line? Row 2 column 1 sounds like those coffee shop old days toilet door 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrianli Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 No more juicy CSI stories to read.☹ 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Hypersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 Initially I thought doxxing is a word that was censored or something. Man I feel like a frog now. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopites Supersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 the recent data leak does it fall under doxxing. Initially I thought doxxing is a word that was censored or something. Man I feel like a frog now. goggle spell check also can't pop up this word. dont worry. hahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ysc3 Twincharged April 2, 2019 Author Share April 2, 2019 Temporary relief.... Just post foreigner news... Local laws should not apply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopites Supersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 (edited) https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/dox origin from the word docs in the 21st century. Oxford said so. Edited April 2, 2019 by Kopites Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beregond Supersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 Ultimately, whether a doxxing offence is made out depends on the context within which the identity information is published. The courts will interpret the law and decide each case based on its own facts. Source: Ministry of Law æ³åºè¯´äºç®. They are the "way", the "truth" and the... [insert your own descriptive] This sentence give me the meaning that they can decided whatever they want.They say got crime mean got crime. Sibei kelong 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopites Supersonic April 2, 2019 Share April 2, 2019 This sentence give me the meaning that they can decided whatever they want. They say got crime mean got crime. Sibei kelong wealthy vs poor playground. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ysc3 Twincharged April 2, 2019 Author Share April 2, 2019 This sentence give me the meaning that they can decided whatever they want. They say got crime mean got crime. Sibei kelong I learnt that 19 years ago. ↡ Advertisement 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Man who evaded taxes on over 1,800 imported vehicles gets jail in default of S$6 million fine
Man who evaded taxes on over 1,800 imported vehicles gets jail in default of S$6 million fine
Johor "safe beyond doubt" and Singaporeans not crime targets
Johor "safe beyond doubt" and Singaporeans not crime targets
Porsche is now made in Malaysia!
Porsche is now made in Malaysia!
Singapore Brand Rims VS China Brand Rims
Singapore Brand Rims VS China Brand Rims
Law Misconceptions in SG
Law Misconceptions in SG
Bill allowing police to collect DNA from more people passed as MPs sound privacy, security concerns
Bill allowing police to collect DNA from more people passed as MPs sound privacy, security concerns
Doctor gets 10 years jail for Sexual Assault
Doctor gets 10 years jail for Sexual Assault
Crime doesn't pay, neither does being a Vigilante
Crime doesn't pay, neither does being a Vigilante