Hong Kong protesters demonstrate against extradition bill

[inlinesix]

3 minutes ago, Vinyl said:

Wow, we got a lawyer here wanting to challenge NSL and HK laws....

Any judicial review of NSL confirms will be arrest.

Is it correct?

[Vinyl]

1 minute ago, inlinesix said:

We change our constitution to change the election rule on EP.

Currently, there is contradiction btw Article 23 of HK Constitution and NSL.
You haven’t address it le other than a matter of interpretation.

I don't need to address it. The barristers in the HK government have already addressed just that you can't accept.

 

You are funny, you want to challenge the law then go and take their government to court...you have every chance....

 

...of losing.

2 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

If communist not bad, why former member of MCP cannot come back to Singapore?

You still living in the past? Cannot let go?

If communists bad, then don't travel to Vietnam or China okay?

[Beregond]

6 minutes ago, Vinyl said:

With a mind fixated to communists bad, I think some people can only see things on one side.

i think good or bad is not up to me or u to decide. we dun even live in a communists country. its for their own ppl to decide.

like i alway say its about respect of each other choice and believe.

dun do to other what u dun want other to do to u .

[inlinesix]

6 minutes ago, Vinyl said:

I don't need to address it. The barristers in the HK government have already addressed just that you can't accept.

 

You are funny, you want to challenge the law then go and take their government to court...you have every chance....

 

...of losing.

You still living in the past? Cannot let go?

If communists bad, then don't travel to Vietnam or China okay?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-security-prosecutions-resign/hong-kongs-top-public-prosecutor-quits-says-he-was-cut-out-of-new-national-security-cases-idUSKCN24W1U0
Why he resign huh?
I don’t live in the past.

If Communist not bad, why former member of MCP are banned from returning to Singapore?

[t0y0ta]

12 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-security-prosecutions-resign/hong-kongs-top-public-prosecutor-quits-says-he-was-cut-out-of-new-national-security-cases-idUSKCN24W1U0
Why he resign huh?
I don’t live in the past.

If Communist not bad, why former member of MCP are banned from returning to Singapore?

 

MCP is LKY best enemy... of course banned. Just like if you don't like ginger you also ban your wife from cooking... but is ginger evil?

[Vinyl]

3 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-security-prosecutions-resign/hong-kongs-top-public-prosecutor-quits-says-he-was-cut-out-of-new-national-security-cases-idUSKCN24W1U0
Why he resign huh?
I don’t live in the past.

If Communist not bad, why former member of MCP are banned from returning to Singapore?

Quote

If Communist not bad, why former member of MCP are banned from returning to Singapore?

I'll answer your question if you can answer this. Are those communists today in China and Vietnam the same as those communists you mentioned in those era?

People have moved on but you still stuck with MCP living rent-free in your head.

Like I said, you are living in the past. You just proved the point. Thanks.

 

You have trouble reading things that you need to ask me why someone resign?

Quote

“It is most unfortunate that I do not see eye to eye with the SJ (Secretary for Justice) on the running of PD (Prosecutions Division), and the situation has not improved with the passage of time,” he wrote in the email obtained by Reuters.

Quote

The new security legislation calls for the setting up of a specialised prosecution division to deal with offences endangering national security, with prosecutors of this division to be appointed by the justice secretary.

 

[inlinesix]

4 minutes ago, t0y0ta said:

MCP is LKY best enemy... of course banned. Just like if you don't like ginger you also ban your wife from cooking... but is ginger evil?

Can Singapore Communist Party be formed now?

[inlinesix]

5 minutes ago, Vinyl said:

I'll answer your question if you can answer this. Are those communists today in China and Vietnam the same as those communists you mentioned in those era?

People have moved on but you still stuck with MCP living rent-free in your head.

Like I said, you are living in the past. You just proved the point. Thanks.

You have trouble reading things that you need to ask me why someone resign?

Since we have move on, why still ban these ppl from coming back?
Other than the change economic system, Communist as a political system is still same old same old.

[Beregond]

6 minutes ago, t0y0ta said:

 

MCP is LKY best enemy... of course banned. Just like if you don't like ginger you also ban your wife from cooking... but is ginger evil?

my neighbour eat curry, i hate curry, i hate the smell, i dun like curry , curry is evil.

i shall stir shit among my neighbour kids to make noise so they wont cook curry any more.

i love steak. steak is good steak is righteous, steak is justice, steak is god. all shall eat steak with me or they are my enemy🤣

[Vinyl]

2 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

Since we have move on, why still ban these ppl from coming back?
Other than the change economic system, Communist as a political system is still same old same old.

Your question should be directed to the Singapore government.

Same old same old but more than 800 millions lifted out of poverty. 400 millions middle-class. Elderly getting pensions, staying retired and taking care of their grandchildren, dancing in the square.

Sounds bad to you right? Because in your mind, communists are incapable of doing anything good? Therefore you support the HK rioters? 

[inlinesix]

8 minutes ago, Vinyl said:

Your question should be directed to the Singapore government.

Same old same old but more than 800 millions lifted out of poverty. 400 millions middle-class. Elderly getting pensions, staying retired and taking care of their grandchildren, dancing in the square.

Sounds bad to you right? Because in your mind, communists are incapable of doing anything good? Therefore you support the HK rioters? 

These 800m has to thank God for letting Mao kick the bucket.

Otherwise, Mao is still busy FIXING DXP, Liu Shao Qi and others.

[Vinyl]

9 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

These 800m has to thank God for letting Mao kick the bucket.

Otherwise, Mao is still busy FIXING DXP, Liu Shao Qi and others.

Oh! You realised Mao is dead already huh? I thought he is still living in your head.

[Voodooman]

18 hours ago, Thaiyotakamli said:

Not lucky usa don’t want to see jap control asia pacific. They are protecting their self interest first. Jap is a threat for them
 

 

Many Asian countries were granted independence after WW2 weakened the Europeans and big bro Uncle Sam supported them (Americans used to be a lot more idealistic then, probably due to their own battle with the Brits). 

If the Axis Power had won, we may still be a colony of Japan today, ruled by a "superior" Yamato race. So I think we are lucky.

History is however written by the victor but the American public were reluctant to get into the war until the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor. They were not the aggressor. Whether US did it to protect their self interest or to expand their global influence, i don't know but most peasants don't want war lah, who wants to send their sons to fight a war in faraway land that will only benefit the elites at the end?

Anyway, OT liow.

Edited August 13, 2020 by Voodooman

[Thaiyotakamli]

37 minutes ago, Voodooman said:

Many Asian countries were granted independence after WW2 weakened the Europeans and big bro Uncle Sam supported them (Americans used to be a lot more idealistic then, probably due to their own battle with the Brits). 

If the Axis Power had won, we may still be a colony of Japan today, ruled by a "superior" Yamato race. So I think we are lucky.

History is however written by the victor but the American public were reluctant to get into the war until the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor. They were not the aggressor. Whether US did it to protect their self interest or to expand their global influence, i don't know but most peasants don't want war lah, who wants to send their sons to fight a war in faraway land that will only benefit the elites at the end?

Anyway, OT liow.

Actually in 1943 japan ald lost fight with china and losing their area in china. Japan getting out of resources. And russia was about to invade japan thats why usa quickly use atomic bomb to make japan surrender to them first

[Beregond]

5 minutes ago, Thaiyotakamli said:

Actually in 1943 japan ald lost fight with china and losing their area in china. Japan getting out of resources. And russia was about to invade japan thats why usa quickly use atomic bomb to make japan surrender to them first

i dun want to discredit the american in anyway for their brave act in ww2 and the effect of the 2 bomb.

but my personal opinion is with or without the american in ww2. the jap and german is doom to fail sooner or later.

does any 1 frankly believe the german is able to rule whole of europe or japan can rule over asia or china even without american fighting them?

no way . there are stretch too thin, facing guerilla warfare everycorner, sooner or later they will be push out. china for instant, even b4 the 2 bomb is drop jap is losing foothold inside and being push back.

see viet iraq war. good weapon allow u to win fight win battle, but in a war that can stretch 10 years or more, u will still lose.

[Voodooman]

50 minutes ago, Beregond said:

i dun want to discredit the american in anyway for their brave act in ww2 and the effect of the 2 bomb.

but my personal opinion is with or without the american in ww2. the jap and german is doom to fail sooner or later.

does any 1 frankly believe the german is able to rule whole of europe or japan can rule over asia or china even without american fighting them?

no way . there are stretch too thin, facing guerilla warfare everycorner, sooner or later they will be push out. china for instant, even b4 the 2 bomb is drop jap is losing foothold inside and being push back.

see viet iraq war. good weapon allow u to win fight win battle, but in a war that can stretch 10 years or more, u will still lose.

Yalor, the Roman, Mongol, British and many other empires also didn't last for very long. 

[Beregond]

31 minutes ago, Voodooman said:

Yalor, the Roman, Mongol, British and many other empires also didn't last for very long. 

i am not saying minority cannot rule over majority.

qing is a great example. (they rule over the han for hundreds of years )

but the cruelty of jap and german make it impossible for them to rule over the land they conquer.

even in modern days. we see minority as ruling gov. i forgot middle east got i think.?

despite all that that.

the intervene of US into the war did bring it to a fast end, no matter for whatever reason they took part and what benefit they reap. the credit their soldier deserve and sacrifice make is undeniable 

[Thaiyotakamli]

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/hong-kong-jimmy-lai-democracy-movement-activists-china-13016976?cid=FBcna