Jump to content
Kopites

Hong Kong protesters demonstrate against extradition bill

Recommended Posts

It was so peaceful but don't know why got fire. Someone smoke lah. Just another day for hkers. 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Victor68 said:

It was so peaceful but don't know why got fire. Someone smoke lah. Just another day for hkers. 

news reported there is always 20% “hardcore protesters”

who believe no “violence” no talk .... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Victor68 said:

It was so peaceful but don't know why got fire. Someone smoke lah. Just another day for hkers. 

Must be police playing with fire. Protesters very peaceful and innocent one. Petrol bomb also undercover police throw one

  • Praise 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Thaiyotakamli said:

 

All industries badly affected except for one 

 

the umbrella factory. 

:D

  • Praise 1
  • Shocked 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a blooper clip in last weekend’s face off in the street...one anti riot polis fired a tear gas only to land right in between his comrades and the rioters. 

I rewinded a few times to find out how that’s possible...then went frame by frame only to see how he misfired the shot and hit the helmet of his mate in front of him.🤣🤣🤣 bobo firer spotted...

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Thaiyotakamli said:

Must be police playing with fire. Protesters very peaceful and innocent one. Petrol bomb also undercover police throw one

Maybe somebody charging PMD ?

  • Praise 2
  • Shocked 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

38 minutes ago, Thaiyotakamli said:

Must be police playing with fire. Protesters very peaceful and innocent one. Petrol bomb also undercover police throw one

Not surprising since everyone (polices & rioters) is in mask.

Rem the 10 policeman who incite riot.  Once police riot, they immediately catch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mersaylee said:

There was a blooper clip in last weekend’s face off in the street...one anti riot polis fired a tear gas only to land right in between his comrades and the rioters. 

I rewinded a few times to find out how that’s possible...then went frame by frame only to see how he misfired the shot and hit the helmet of his mate in front of him.🤣🤣🤣 bobo firer spotted...

Last week, police was facing the wind.  Once tear gas was fired, tear gas blew back to them.

This afternoon, i saw photo of rioter threw smoking tear gas cannister into PLA barrack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is the winner of HK riots

By an Ang Mo by the name of Hans Otto Kroeger

HK protests (and riots) have the full attention of all western media. The western media wanted some blood to run. They predicted a Chinese intervention and a “massacre”, and told us, before anything happened, that China certainly would intervene and cause a massive bloodbath; they also told us, in bold headlines, the first “martyr” and at a closer look it seems he fell from a building while unfolding a banner. So, obviously there is to little blood to make a story that western media can sell to their stupid audience. So, they call for more blood, they call for a Chinese intervention, but nothing happens. So, when nothing happens there are no news.

On the other hand, what the protesters demand is not reasonable, is illogical, given the special administration for HK. Published in a western media as a “claim for liberty and democracy” sounds ridiculous even to a brainwashed western capitalism supporter. They can’t do that anymore. So, sorry, but your “protests” won’t get attention anymore, capitalism lost, and lost in a ridiculous way, as they “invested” in a speculative intervention of the “very, very evil Chinese communists” (that would be the “after facts” statement of Donald Trump).

Who is the general winner after those protests? Obviously the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party. Who are the losers? Hong Kong - no longer will it be considered a safe haven for capital; UK, and US, who invested money and trust into the hope of a military intervention from China, and just the opposite happened. Now what? Neither Trump, nor CIA, nor the UK government can sustain anymore their ridiculous statement of the “very, very evil Chinese communists”: The statement went simply ridiculous. Xi Jinping never will say it, because he is a well educated man; but: Mister Trump; Mister Pompeo; Mister Abrams; Mister Bolton; Lords of England: You are the losers in this battle, and you lost miserably without even the need for anyone of us to raise a hand! You have been trapped in your own mousetrap!

  • Praise 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont junk me but when I read of the riots and beatings done by the rioters in the name of democracy, I am reminded of the minister who said 

"Gang rape is democracy in action" - or something like that.

Some one in hwz says something like HKers have been brainwashed that in the name of democracy, everything is permissible.  That's why they keep rioting.  

Edited by Philipkee
Typo
  • Praise 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Ash2017 said:

Appreciate if you read before you quote and post.

There is clear difference between assisting providing eg money to your friend versus you yourself go and whack the enemy yourself

 

China pushed back American forces in North Korea in 1951.

China invaded border regions of North Vietnam in 1979 after Vietnam invaded Cambodia to pacify the khmer rouge regime there. Note that China supported Vietnam during the Vietnam war. 

  • Praise 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Ash2017 said:

A total of 180,000 Chinese soldiers were killed while they fought with North Korea against US aggression in the early 1950s, a Chinese major general said ahead of the 60th anniversary of the Korean War, which fell last Friday.

 

I think you missed the point, China did not ever shot a single shot as an aggressor. 

 

 

Nk was the aggressor in 1950. Drove south Korean and un forces to busan. Over rest of 1950, Usa led UN forces counter attack past Seoul and the original 38th parallel deep into North Korea. The Chinese crossed over the yalu and began attacking in late 1950 which was a surprise attack with zero declaration. 

That's fact. 

You can say that China was securing its border and vassal state as its warranted to do. The Chinese didn't want a USA friendly Korea just across the yalu River. 

It's also highly unlikely that the Americans were going to start ww3 with the Chinese (though there was no diplomatic relations with the mainland since 1949). Their aim was the pacification of the Korean peninsula in support of SK. 

To say that the Chinese weren't the aggressor in the Korean peninsula is totally inaccurate. The Chinese fired the first shots at the Americans pursuing North Korean forces. In fact it was a massive surprise attack. 

Edited by Lala81
  • Praise 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Prince Edward MTR Station police brutality incident last night. 

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3025241/chaos-hong-kongs-mtr-network-police-chase-protesters

This is the full video of the incident. Most videos circulating online will have the first half edited away to sell the story. Black shirts nowadays also change shirt color upon hearing police arrival. As to who is innocent and who is troublemaker I leave you to judge for yourself. 

 

Edited by Jellandross
  • Praise 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
 
1
29 minutes ago, Jellandross said:

The Prince Edward MTR Station police brutality incident last night. 

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3025241/chaos-hong-kongs-mtr-network-police-chase-protesters

This is the full video of the incident. Most videos circulating online will have the first half edited away to sell the story. Black shirts nowadays also change shirt color upon hearing police arrival. As to who is innocent and who is troublemaker I leave you to judge for yourself. 

 

 

  • Praise 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lala81 said:

 

Nk was the aggressor in 1950. Drove south Korean and un forces to busan. Over rest of 1950, Usa led UN forces counter attack past Seoul and the original 38th parallel deep into North Korea. The Chinese crossed over the yalu and began attacking in late 1950 which was a surprise attack with zero declaration. 

That's fact. 

You can say that China was securing its border and vassal state as its warranted to do. The Chinese didn't want a USA friendly Korea just across the yalu River. 

It's also highly unlikely that the Americans were going to start ww3 with the Chinese (though there was no diplomatic relations with the mainland since 1949). Their aim was the pacification of the Korean peninsula in support of SK. 

To say that the Chinese weren't the aggressor in the Korean peninsula is totally inaccurate. The Chinese fired the first shots at the Americans pursuing North Korean forces. In fact it was a massive surprise attack. 

Think american support south korean

 

china also support north korean 

↡ Advertisement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×