Kklee 6th Gear October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Didu said: I suspect those elected officials sees everything thru political lens. 🧐 Yes, allowing more people to own cars to boost collection from taxes & COE. Ownership, yes, but Govt did not encourage people to drive them onto the roads. Muah...ha...ha...ha SG is already the most expensive country in the world for car ownership. (This one I guess no other country can overtake for next few hundred yrs) IMHO. Some see, some follow. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 34 minutes ago, yishunite said: Not my point What i meant was pmv users could unite to tilt enough voters and throw out lampamin You mean most PMD user stays in SK? Unlike PMD users, most car owner no ball to get together to go MPS & KPKB. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eyke Supercharged October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 why keep harping on distance-based charging? we already being distance-charged! it's called petrol tax 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnahp Supercharged October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 3 hours ago, Butakim said: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/parliament/videos/october/amy-khor-on-superior-security-features-of-next-generation-obus-13202826 Show and Tell. Can see the new OBUs. that 3 plastic boxes are really a mess 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Hypersonic October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 classic case(again) of ownself praise ownself. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellowshaun 4th Gear October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, yishunite said: I will happily give another GRC to WP in exchange for this unit. Well said well said. All these stubborn bulldozing through of policies by the scholars haiya... Edited October 6, 2020 by yellowshaun Grammar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotr 6th Gear October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 3 hours ago, yishunite said: What's the population of PMV users in sg? I will happily give another GRC to WP in exchange for this unit. OYK is Sembawang GRC? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kklee 6th Gear October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 2 hours ago, Eyke said: why keep harping on distance-based charging? we already being distance-charged! it's called petrol tax No wonder SG so slow in adopting EV and Hybrid. 😀 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lethalstrike Turbocharged October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 On 10/5/2020 at 5:24 PM, Mockngbrd said: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-erp-unit-obu-smartphones-lta-study-13202820 Jiak sai la I thought initially they said its not possible for smartphone integration as there is a security risk of the data being hacked? The ERP 2.0 has to be a closed system not connected to the internet so there is zero security risk yada yada...now Amy Khor can come out say smartphone integration possible as a future upgrade? Lanjiao lah. 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrianli Hypersonic October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 10 hours ago, Beanoyip said: Do you all think distance based charging will reduce the number of cars on the road? Yes. If the charges are 50 cents to one dollar per km. Those clocking 20k km a year is like giving $20k to LTA pocket per year, sure huat ah!!! Even better payout then COE. 10 years $200k leh. COE only can get $30-40k for 10 years. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnahp Supercharged October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Adrianli said: Yes. If the charges are 50 cents to one dollar per km. Those clocking 20k km a year is like giving $20k to LTA pocket per year, sure huat ah!!! Even better payout then COE. 10 years $200k leh. COE only can get $30-40k for 10 years. it affects everyone, not only car owners teksi and grab also need to pay the road charges, unless teksi and PHV has different (lower) rate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodooman Supersonic October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 2 hours ago, Lethalstrike said: I thought initially they said its not possible for smartphone integration as there is a security risk of the data being hacked? The ERP 2.0 has to be a closed system not connected to the internet so there is zero security risk yada yada...now Amy Khor can come out say smartphone integration possible as a future upgrade? Lanjiao lah. If it is just an interface to push info one way to the phone, it might still be a closed system. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carride Clutched October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 Correct me if I am wrong. After googling, Understand that there were about 29K taxis before Grab/Uber. With introduction of Grab/Uber, PHV numbers went up more than 70K (exclude taxis). With these numbers, how to have less cars on the road. On one end, talked about carlite, next moment generate more road users. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo72 6th Gear October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 5 minutes ago, Carride said: Correct me if I am wrong. After googling, Understand that there were about 29K taxis before Grab/Uber. With introduction of Grab/Uber, PHV numbers went up more than 70K (exclude taxis). With these numbers, how to have less cars on the road. On one end, talked about carlite, next moment generate more road users. To the scholars at LTA, PHV and taxis are not private car but cars used to supplement the Public Transport Infrastructure. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carride Clutched October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 Well, those scholars must be thinking hard now. When this idea was suggested, no PHV at that time. Maybe taxi will be excluded. Now, with PHV more than taxi, how do they implement it? No charge or like someone had highlighted could be at lower rate. Or have fare then charge? What happen to this cost if others remain the same? Pass to the fare? Besides, these hugh numbers (combination of taxi and PHV) that supplement publlic transport system also being used for privately use (no fare). How is this going to relate to solely private car users. Maybe that is why they need a big and bulky system for processing. It is just my guess. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beanoyip Turbocharged October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 8 hours ago, Voodooman said: If it is just an interface to push info one way to the phone, it might still be a closed system. Correct, i think it's just mirroring the output from the OBU to the phone, so maybe the OBU can be tucked away somewhere where it's not so obstructive 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnahp Supercharged October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 if these 3 plastic boxes are cast in stone (pun intended), I will install the screen and the processing unit in the boot and run an extension cable from the boot to connect to the antenna on the front windscreen my initial idea was putting all three boxes at the back of the car, (like 1990s CD changer) antenna on the REAR windscreen since it is getting signals from the satellite in the sky but likely existing carpark system will require a front facing antenna to work properly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic October 6, 2020 Share October 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Phang said: if these 3 plastic boxes are cast in stone (pun intended), I will install the screen and the processing unit in the boot and run an extension cable from the boot to connect to the antenna on the front windscreen my initial idea was putting all three boxes at the back of the car, (like 1990s CD changer) antenna on the REAR windscreen since it is getting signals from the satellite in the sky but likely existing carpark system will require a front facing antenna to work properly My worry is car park system is not updated. Till now, I stay away from contactless cashcard or ezlink ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Charge by distance erp
Charge by distance erp
Any personal contact pickup/van/lorry rental? Short distance
Any personal contact pickup/van/lorry rental? Short distance
MALAYSIA TIPS - Long Distance Driving Trips
MALAYSIA TIPS - Long Distance Driving Trips
Keeping a safe distance / accident history
Keeping a safe distance / accident history
BBKs. For endurance and feel, not stopping distance?
BBKs. For endurance and feel, not stopping distance?
Ester base engine oil
Ester base engine oil
Exchange rate issues! Worth going the distance?
Exchange rate issues! Worth going the distance?