BabyBlade Internal Moderator September 20, 2019 Share September 20, 2019 This makes me quite sad. Removing one of the most iconic Merlion in Singapore to boost tourism at a budget of $90 million dollars? Shouldn't the Merlion be incorporated into future plans instead? Bring your kids to see the Merlion one last time because in SG, nothing lasts forever. Sentosa is just another tourist trap now. ↡ Advertisement 8 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tianmo Hypersonic September 20, 2019 Share September 20, 2019 The title is so misleading. Please indicate that it is the Merlion of Sentosa, and NOT the Guardian of our island located at the Merlion park. The Merlion at the Merlion park, is the mascot of Singapore, and our Guardian from evil attacks from the sea. It will never be demolish. Please go read up on how much was taken into the relocation in 2002, and how respectful our senior leaders are towards the Merlion. The one at sentosa? That was always a tourists attraction, and nothing wrong to demolish a tourists attraction to make way for better attractions. It really gave me a shock had I not read the whole thing. Totally misleading and unacceptable. 16 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benarsenal Turbocharged September 20, 2019 Share September 20, 2019 2 hours ago, Tianmo said: The title is so misleading. Please indicate that it is the Merlion of Sentosa, and NOT the Guardian of our island located at the Merlion park. The Merlion at the Merlion park, is the mascot of Singapore, and our Guardian from evil attacks from the sea. It will never be demolish. Please go read up on how much was taken into the relocation in 2002, and how respectful our senior leaders are towards the Merlion. The one at sentosa? That was always a tourists attraction, and nothing wrong to demolish a tourists attraction to make way for better attractions. It really gave me a shock had I not read the whole thing. Totally misleading and unacceptable. Yeah. Sentosa Merlion = fake Merlion. Merlion Park Merlion = Real Merlion 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanCoe Hypersonic September 20, 2019 Share September 20, 2019 I oso tot it was the one in the city ...... don’t really bother much with the Sentosa one ......... anyway nothing in Singapore is permanent , everything is like 30 year lease , wonder what will happen to Haw Par Villa too as it’s really high maintenance and also sitting on good real estate and not earning much 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadX Moderator September 20, 2019 Share September 20, 2019 7 hours ago, Tianmo said: The title is so misleading. Please indicate that it is the Merlion of Sentosa, and NOT the Guardian of our island located at the Merlion park. The Merlion at the Merlion park, is the mascot of Singapore, and our Guardian from evil attacks from the sea. It will never be demolish. Please go read up on how much was taken into the relocation in 2002, and how respectful our senior leaders are towards the Merlion. The one at sentosa? That was always a tourists attraction, and nothing wrong to demolish a tourists attraction to make way for better attractions. It really gave me a shock had I not read the whole thing. Totally misleading and unacceptable. Lol. Same la.. both also useless one hahhahha 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mersaylee Supersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 The one kena lightning strike one was blessed by Thor. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mockngbrd Supersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 (edited) Guardian? Merlion is stb invention la. Bluff chewren n tourists one. There is only 1 emperor of sg. Edited September 21, 2019 by Mockngbrd 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karoon Turbocharged September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 Is there a typo? $90 million sounds like the price tag for a 4 lane highway across sentosa, not a pedestrian bridge. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusje Supersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 8 hours ago, Tianmo said: The title is so misleading. Please indicate that it is the Merlion of Sentosa, and NOT the Guardian of our island located at the Merlion park. The Merlion at the Merlion park, is the mascot of Singapore, and our Guardian from evil attacks from the sea. It will never be demolish. Please go read up on how much was taken into the relocation in 2002, and how respectful our senior leaders are towards the Merlion. The one at sentosa? That was always a tourists attraction, and nothing wrong to demolish a tourists attraction to make way for better attractions. It really gave me a shock had I not read the whole thing. Totally misleading and unacceptable. I agree it is misleading and what is demolished isn't the real Merlion. But the real Merlion is also a tourist attraction. It was a marketing gimmick created by the tourism board. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mersaylee Supersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 The real McCoy is best. Can drink can wash hair... see? Ma YJ didn’t need to bring along a water bottle... 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloe111 5th Gear September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Mockngbrd said: Guardian? Merlion is stb invention la. Bluff chewren n tourists one. There is only 1 emperor of sg. Yes, the real mascot statue and guardian of SG is coming soon at GBTBE 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanCoe Hypersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 What GBTBE?? 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yishunite Turbocharged September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 Who is paying for this super overpriced bridge? Us izit 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RH1667 Hypersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 10 hours ago, BabyBlade said: This makes me quite sad. Removing one of the most iconic Merlion in Singapore to boost tourism at a budget of $90 million dollars? Shouldn't the Merlion be incorporated into future plans instead? Bring your kids to see the Merlion one last time because in SG, nothing lasts forever. Sentosa is just another tourist trap now. When a rubbish bin center cost almost $1 million, I wonder what will we get finally with 90 million? 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atonchia Supersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 3 hours ago, BanCoe said: I oso tot it was the one in the city ...... don’t really bother much with the Sentosa one ......... anyway nothing in Singapore is permanent , everything is like 30 year lease , wonder what will happen to Haw Par Villa too as it’s really high maintenance and also sitting on good real estate and not earning much This place much older than SG independence? Very long history already.....and one of its kind place of interest. Thought its free entry so no earning. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 10 hours ago, Tianmo said: The title is so misleading. Please indicate that it is the Merlion of Sentosa, and NOT the Guardian of our island located at the Merlion park. The Merlion at the Merlion park, is the mascot of Singapore, and our Guardian from evil attacks from the sea. It will never be demolish. Please go read up on how much was taken into the relocation in 2002, and how respectful our senior leaders are towards the Merlion. The one at sentosa? That was always a tourists attraction, and nothing wrong to demolish a tourists attraction to make way for better attractions. It really gave me a shock had I not read the whole thing. Totally misleading and unacceptable. You don’t say I also don’t know these stuffs 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanCoe Hypersonic September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 34 minutes ago, Atonchia said: This place much older than SG independence? Very long history already.....and one of its kind place of interest. Thought its free entry so no earning. Yes it’s built in 1937 according to google , now in govt hands so it’s going to cost them quite a bit to maintain 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playtime Twincharged September 21, 2019 Share September 21, 2019 4 hours ago, BanCoe said: I oso tot it was the one in the city ...... don’t really bother much with the Sentosa one ......... anyway nothing in Singapore is permanent , everything is like 30 year lease , wonder what will happen to Haw Par Villa too as it’s really high maintenance and also sitting on good real estate and not earning much 38 oxley will be permanent.. It will be mentioned together with the pyramids in time to come.. 😂 ↡ Advertisement 7 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Police investigating after body retrieved in waters off Merlion Park
Police investigating after body retrieved in waters off Merlion Park
Another no horse run kindness act.
Another no horse run kindness act.
3rd JB-Singapore bridge?
3rd JB-Singapore bridge?
Taiwan bridge collapse
Taiwan bridge collapse
Indonesia to build link bridge between Bintan and Batam
Indonesia to build link bridge between Bintan and Batam
Turning a Router into a Bridge
Turning a Router into a Bridge
A new norm?! Link bridge funded by residents?
A new norm?! Link bridge funded by residents?