Count-Bracula Twincharged October 18, 2019 Share October 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Jamesc said: This shows Singapore students are the smartest in the world. Swedish student scold people in the UN and what does she get? Nothing. HK student protest on the street and what do they get? Nothing. Singapore student? At least he get some nice photos to keep for the mammaries. LMAO!! ↡ Advertisement 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windwaver Turbocharged October 18, 2019 Share October 18, 2019 On 9/26/2019 at 12:25 PM, Ysc3 said: In other words, got potential to do good in future, then present can do bad! That means if a person don't have potential then will have longer sentence loh. So much for elitism 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fu11thr0tt1e Turbocharged October 18, 2019 Share October 18, 2019 55 minutes ago, Windwaver said: That means if a person don't have potential then will have longer sentence loh. So much for elitism The correct term is DOUBLE STANDARDS. 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playtime Twincharged October 19, 2019 Share October 19, 2019 7 hours ago, Fu11thr0tt1e said: The correct term is DOUBLE STANDARDS. One society two systems. 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeshe Turbocharged October 19, 2019 Share October 19, 2019 On 10/18/2019 at 12:37 AM, Kyrios said: Lai liao...another NUS offender...this time is a lecturer https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/nus-senior-lecturer-jailed-for-molesting-undergrad-on-crowded-campus-shuttle He conducting biochemistry test? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fu11thr0tt1e Turbocharged October 19, 2019 Share October 19, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Playtime said: One society two systems. I don't recall LKY practice double standards when he was in charged! We need to vote for a fairer system where every Singapore child is treated fairly and equally! Period Edited October 19, 2019 by Fu11thr0tt1e 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sosaria Turbocharged October 19, 2019 Share October 19, 2019 (edited) 22 hours ago, Windwaver said: That means if a person don't have potential then will have longer sentence loh. So much for elitism That's how lawyers will plead for their clients. Good qualifications equals more likely to hold a better job, more stability, and more to lose should he or she re-offend. Good family background also implies a better support structure and more reliable eyes monitoring. Thus a better candidate for rehabilitation. Compared to pai kia, unemployed, bad influence all around, nothing to lose. Broken family, no supervision. Edited October 19, 2019 by Sosaria 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mockngbrd Supersonic October 21, 2019 Share October 21, 2019 This fella not nus still trying luck. Confirm no bright future one. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/polytechnic-student-edmund-chong-jail-video-woman-showering-12020786 1 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxus-MIFA9 Supersonic October 21, 2019 Share October 21, 2019 Can really see the double standard practices here ..... Uni vs Poly ... Probation vs Jail ... 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philipkee Twincharged October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 I am of the opinion that with a bright future, perhaps sentences should not be so severe. Why ruin the future of a person unnecessarily? The problem now is now do you know who has a bright future? You cant say NUS student definitely has a brighter future than an ITE. So either all sentences for peeping Tom cases/ uploading of videos should be equally severe or equally lenient. I think if it is possible, the law should allow for custodial jail sentence with no record. How it works is like that. An adult who is arrested for peeping is jailed for two years (for example). He has a criminal record. Perhaps for students or problem under 25, those caught can be jailed for two years as well but upon release, the record is stricken off. If he re offends he is considered a first time offender again (but now he will go to jail and have criminal record). It has to be a jail sentence because i think boys home have an age limit. This will be a balance because students wont want to have their studies disrupted by being in jail for two years, there is some measure of justice meted out and their future prospects are also not ruined because there is no criminal record. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beregond Supersonic October 22, 2019 Author Share October 22, 2019 47 minutes ago, Philipkee said: I am of the opinion that with a bright future, perhaps sentences should not be so severe. Why ruin the future of a person unnecessarily? The problem now is now do you know who has a bright future? You cant say NUS student definitely has a brighter future than an ITE. So either all sentences for peeping Tom cases/ uploading of videos should be equally severe or equally lenient. I think if it is possible, the law should allow for custodial jail sentence with no record. How it works is like that. An adult who is arrested for peeping is jailed for two years (for example). He has a criminal record. Perhaps for students or problem under 25, those caught can be jailed for two years as well but upon release, the record is stricken off. If he re offends he is considered a first time offender again (but now he will go to jail and have criminal record). It has to be a jail sentence because i think boys home have an age limit. This will be a balance because students wont want to have their studies disrupted by being in jail for two years, there is some measure of justice meted out and their future prospects are also not ruined because there is no criminal record. bro are u serious....i cannot agree to this. when u say should not be so severe. is it because u feel peeping or touching is also not severe?? 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atrecord Supersonic October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Picnic06-Biante15 said: Can really see the double standard practices here ..... Uni vs Poly ... Probation vs Jail ... Now all eyes will be on those lenient cases pending appeal, see whether the Court will impose jail as public uproar can be deafening, as it has been... The NUS guys now stressed after been happy... 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atrecord Supersonic October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 51 minutes ago, Philipkee said: I am of the opinion that with a bright future, perhaps sentences should not be so severe. Why ruin the future of a person unnecessarily? The problem now is now do you know who has a bright future? You cant say NUS student definitely has a brighter future than an ITE. So either all sentences for peeping Tom cases/ uploading of videos should be equally severe or equally lenient. I think if it is possible, the law should allow for custodial jail sentence with no record. How it works is like that. An adult who is arrested for peeping is jailed for two years (for example). He has a criminal record. Perhaps for students or problem under 25, those caught can be jailed for two years as well but upon release, the record is stricken off. If he re offends he is considered a first time offender again (but now he will go to jail and have criminal record). It has to be a jail sentence because i think boys home have an age limit. This will be a balance because students wont want to have their studies disrupted by being in jail for two years, there is some measure of justice meted out and their future prospects are also not ruined because there is no criminal record. Cannot lah. Like this will have no deterrence. Everyday will have many offenders one... 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mockngbrd Supersonic October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 58 minutes ago, Philipkee said: I am of the opinion that with a bright future, perhaps sentences should not be so severe. Why ruin the future of a person unnecessarily? The problem now is now do you know who has a bright future? You cant say NUS student definitely has a brighter future than an ITE. So either all sentences for peeping Tom cases/ uploading of videos should be equally severe or equally lenient. I think if it is possible, the law should allow for custodial jail sentence with no record. How it works is like that. An adult who is arrested for peeping is jailed for two years (for example). He has a criminal record. Perhaps for students or problem under 25, those caught can be jailed for two years as well but upon release, the record is stricken off. If he re offends he is considered a first time offender again (but now he will go to jail and have criminal record). It has to be a jail sentence because i think boys home have an age limit. This will be a balance because students wont want to have their studies disrupted by being in jail for two years, there is some measure of justice meted out and their future prospects are also not ruined because there is no criminal record. + if amdk molest girl, must punish the girl for bring slut. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philipkee Twincharged October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Beregond said: bro are u serious....i cannot agree to this. when u say should not be so severe. is it because u feel peeping or touching is also not severe?? I dunno. When I say severe, I was meaning destroy a future over this? My opinion for severity of crimes Severe would be - murder, loan sharking, drug trafficking, assault and battery, robbery rape and molest. Definite jail and caning or death sentence. Not so severe Theft. I think this one it's like depend on the amount and motive. Peeping Tom - a bit vague when it comes to students. Definitely there must be punishment but to destroy a future? I dunno. So I was thinking of a custodial jail sentence as opposed to a criminal record. Off topic. If a student stole my wallet and returned it, I also dont think it's worth destroying a person's future with criminal record as well. Or if someone stole my money to buy food I wont press for any punishment. But that's me. Cos I dont think it's that severe. Other crimes, I dunno. You must specify then I give my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beregond Supersonic October 22, 2019 Author Share October 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, Atrecord said: Cannot lah. Like this will have no deterrence. Everyday will have many offenders one... deterrence is 1 issue, if we feel peeping and touch filming is something minor, we should not spoil the offender future. then its the best prove we have fallen. our 道德思想 reach the btm. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxus-MIFA9 Supersonic October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 (edited) Every year, there are few thousand graduated from the different courses they had taken in all Uni in SG (NUS, NTI, SIM, SMU, Curtin's, James Crook. ......etc). The percentage of the those committed an offences should comes to about maybe 0.001%. So punish them with accordance to the law stated in the "Penal Code" or "Criminal Procedure Code" will not dilute the future pool of talented graduates from the few thousands yearly. So giving the reason that he/her future as a preceeding factors in sentencing is rubbish. So many examples in the past had shown that persons send to prison comes out a much better person and contribute greatly to the societies. One good example was our late great criminal lawyer, Subash. He studied hard in prison and becomes a good lawyer. Many learned their lesson in prison and a change person when released. Some with good GPA results and top honor would at a later stage might commit offences as human nature is a funny thing, 'alway not enough or hungrier for more' .... To me, sentence them as according to the law fairly and not his qualifications, future or family background..... Edited October 22, 2019 by Picnic06-Biante15 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philipkee Twincharged October 22, 2019 Share October 22, 2019 8 minutes ago, Atrecord said: Cannot lah. Like this will have no deterrence. Everyday will have many offenders one... If a two year jail sentence cannot deter students who are presumably educated(even if no criminal record), I think we are in deep s××t. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Chicken Hotpot calls NUS to verify student’s review
Chicken Hotpot calls NUS to verify student’s review
studying IT in singapore.
studying IT in singapore.
Molester used private-hire car services to find victims
Molester used private-hire car services to find victims
Chief Justice slaps 'potential to excel’ NUS molester with 2 weeks’ jail
Chief Justice slaps 'potential to excel’ NUS molester with 2 weeks’ jail
Nus rope bondage event
Nus rope bondage event
NUS Dentistry Student Strangled Ex-Girlfriend
NUS Dentistry Student Strangled Ex-Girlfriend
Duke-NUS scientist accused of spying for Russians in the US
Duke-NUS scientist accused of spying for Russians in the US