Jump to content
[FB Live] Get Exclusive Prices Across The Entire Volkswagen Range On Our Facebook LIVE featuring Julian and Idris!  Read more... ×
Ysc3

High Court acquits maid of stealing S$34,000 worth of items from CAG chairman Liew Mun Leong’s home

Recommended Posts

Twincharged

i think need to organise another crowd funding to help the CAG chairman ...

High Court acquits maid of stealing S$34,000 worth of items from CAG chairman Liew Mun Leong’s home

Ms Parti Liyani, 46, was sentenced to 26 months’ jail last year after being convicted
Justice Chan Seng Onn ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the four theft charges beyond a reasonable doubt
In acquitting her, he said her employers may not have filed a police report if she did not threaten to report them to the authorities for making her work at more than one household
 

One-and-a-half years after being convicted of stealing S$34,000 worth of items from Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong and his family, a foreign domestic worker has been acquitted of all charges by the High Court.  

Last year, a district judge had found Ms Parti Liyani, 46, guilty of four theft charges and sentenced her to 26 months’ jail.

But on Friday (Sept 4), Justice Chan Seng Onn ruled that the district court had failed to consider several points, including the credibility of the testimony of Mr Liew’s son, Mr Karl Liew. 

Ms Parti, an Indonesian, worked for Mr Liew Mun Leong for about nine years until her employment was abruptly terminated on Oct 28, 2016. 

After she was fired, Ms Parti threatened to file a complaint with the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) about how she was forced to work illegally at his son’s home and office.

Mr Liew Mun Leong, who is also chairman of infrastructure consultancy Surbana Jurong, and his son made a police report against Ms Parti two days after firing her. They accused her of stealing items including 115 pieces of clothing, a DVD player, a Gerald Genta luxury watch, a Prada bag and Gucci sunglasses.

Read also: Maid picked up items Liew Mun Leong’s family had thrown out, says defence lawyer

She left for Indonesia the day she was fired and was arrested on Dec 2, 2016 at Changi Airport when she returned to Singapore.

During her district court trial, Ms Parti denied stealing the items and said that they had been discarded, were meant to be recycled or belonged to her.

REASONS FOR ACQUITTAL

Justice Chan found that there was “ample basis” for Ms Parti to make the complaint and the Liews may not have reported her to the police without her threat. 

Read also: Domestic worker ‘tried to get Liew Mun Leong’s family to ship stolen items to her’

As the consequences of a complaint by Ms Parti would be serious, the judge said he believed that the Liews would be “very concerned” if she followed through with it.

They thus had an “improper motive” in mounting the allegations against her, Justice Chan said.

“There is reason to believe that the Liew family, upon realising her unhappiness, took the pre-emptive first step to terminate without giving her sufficient time to pack and complain to MOM,” he added.

Read also: Losing cherished personal items hurt, says Changi Airport Group’s chairman who accused maid of theft

As for the chain of custody of evidence, the judge found that the police had delayed in seizing the items and the Liews had mishandled them.

After Ms Parti was fired, Mr Karl Liew gave her three jumbo boxes and two hours to pack her belongings, which were then sealed with tape. 

He eventually agreed to pay for them to be shipped to Indonesia.

When Ms Parti left for Indonesia later that day, Mr Liew's wife suspected that she had stolen thermal wear as well, so they checked the boxes the next morning. 

They spent two hours on this and took a 21-second video.

They then took some items out of the boxes to use. Mr Karl Liew was also only able to identify 34 items from the video footage they took.

There was thus a “real possibility of a mixup of items” and reasonable doubt that they were accurately documented in photographs taken five weeks later.

The trial judge also did not consider expert evidence that was unchallenged by the prosecution, Justice Chan said.

Many of the items appeared old, not functioning well or of much lower value than what the Liews testified them to be, the High Court judge said.

For example, the Helix watch — originally valued by Mr Karl Liew at S$50 — was a free door gift.

Mr Karl Liew was also “not only lacking in credibility but did not take the process of giving testimony seriously”, Justice Chan said. 

His evidence that he had several items of women’s clothing, some of which were for smaller-sized women, was “highly suspect”. 

He had testified during the trial that he liked to cross-dress.

“I’m troubled by various aspects of Karl’s evidence that the (district court) judge did not appear to have considered,” Justice Chan added.

He also said that Ms Parti did not have a Bahasa Indonesia interpreter with her when she was interrogated by the police and lacked the chance to view the “large number of physical items”.

‘I’M SO GLAD I’M FINALLY FREE’

After the hearing ended, Ms Parti — who has stayed in a shelter run by non-governmental organisation Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (Home) since her arrest — cried and hugged several Home employees.

She told reporters through an interpreter: “I’m so glad I’m finally free. I’ve been fighting for four years now and I’ve been strong all this while.”

When questioned on her future plans, she said that she would like to return home. 

However, she still faces a fifth charge of fraudulently possessing other alleged stolen items owned by unidentified individuals.

Her pro bono lawyer, Mr Anil Balchandani from Red Lion Circle, said that they are “ready to stand trial” on this charge.

They will also speak to the Liews to seek compensation for Ms Parti’s loss of income over the last four years. 

The loss is assessed to be “several tens of thousands of dollars”, Mr Balchandani said.

Asked if she had anything to say to her lawyer, Ms Parti hugged him and said: “I’m so grateful to Anil. I don’t know how to pay him back.”

He replied: “I did nothing much except to repeat what she told me.” 

Justice Chan had commended Mr Balchandani, saying he “put in a lot of effort and showed a lot of dedication in his work”. 

The lawyer also represented Ms Parti during the district court trial.

In a statement, Home said that they were “glad that justice has prevailed”. 

Migrant workers such as Ms Parti, who have been wrongfully accused, “are left waiting in a foreign country while investigations are ongoing” and often cannot work, it said. Some may choose to plead guilty due to the circumstances they face.

“Home believes that every individual should be given a chance at a fair trial, and access to legal representation, regardless of their work pass status or nationality,” it added.
 

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turbocharged (edited)

High class but yet behaviour so low class. Send the maid to work in another household and also office? This guy can afford to hire whole platoon of maids. Why'd he do this? To save some small change?

Son like to cross-dress and this is his own testimony ... wtf

Edited by Sosaria
  • Praise 7
  • Angry 1
  • Shocked 1
  • Haha! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supersonic (edited)
22 minutes ago, Sosaria said:

High class but yet behaviour so low class. Send the maid to work in another household and also office? This guy can afford to hire whole platoon of maids. Why'd he do this? To save some small change?

Son like to cross-dress and this is his own testimony ... wtf

I hope Justice is meted out.  Seems like a lot of fake statements being given to twist the story. A total disregard for the law and  courts of Singapore, if you ask me.   You see this even in HK and Korean movies.  Lets see whats done now that the truth is out ....

Edited by Throttle2
  • Praise 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turbocharged (edited)
35 minutes ago, Throttle2 said:

I hope Justice is meted out.  Seems like a lot of fake statements being given to twist the story. A total disregard for the law and  courts of Singapore, if you ask me.   You see this even in HK and Korean movies.  Lets see whats done now that the truth is out ....

Reported that the maid just wants to claim back the years of lost income as the case took time and dragged through the courts. Should be small potatoes considering a chairman's pay.

Edited by Sosaria
  • Praise 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hypersonic

High SES but low class character.. Already fired her  but yet still go thru such deceitful ways to 'fix' a maid who earn so much less then them.  

  • Praise 4
  • Shocked 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turbocharged
Quote

"I've settled my life, my children's lives and I've also looked at the future and there's nothing I need that I cannot afford," says the 72-year-old who has three children and seven grandchildren.

Now the chairman of the Changi Airport Group (CAG), he says he is contented with his home (a landed property in Chancery Lane) and his car (a BMW 7 series). He no longer buys expensive timepieces and now wears an Apple watch.

In fact, his private banker has told him he can live comfortably from the interest on his wealth.

His comment from a past interview. Maybe paying the maid would affect his principal wealth... lol 

  • Haha! 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersonic

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/i-always-hire-people-who-are-better-than-me

I always hire people who are better than me, says Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong.

In 2007, Mr Liew Mun Leong - then chief executive of CapitaLand - received a staggering $20.52 million bonus for helping the property developer achieve a record profit of $2.76 billion that year.

He is a wealthy man, but wealth, he says, means nothing to him.

 

  • Shocked 1
  • Haha! 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The richer you are, the MORE mean is your behaviour.

Apple watch ?  Still easily $500, wear a casio lah. 

 

Put all his AP, Rol, into safes and admires at home.

 

  • Haha! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twincharged
31 minutes ago, Weez911 said:

I always hire people who are better than me, says Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong.

He is a wealthy man, but wealth, he says, means nothing to him.

Wow!  This speaks volumes of the man... We must all respect him! 

In his own words,  apparently the maid is better than him... He is honest. 

Wealth means nothing to him - especially when it's not his - he is still honest. 

  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twincharged
27 minutes ago, Sosaria said:

Chinese have a saying that wealth will not last beyond 3 generations! 

How I wish they had an opposite saying for that also.... Eg,   Poverty will not last beyond 3 generations... 😂 😂 

Hope my kid will do better than me. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha! 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turbocharged (edited)
1 hour ago, Mockngbrd said:

Hopefully she sues back then we can see show 

who is the employer? the young liew is bankrupt according to straits times in 2018

Edited by Mkl22
  • Praise 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hypersonic
12 hours ago, Sosaria said:

High class but yet behaviour so low class. Send the maid to work in another household and also office? This guy can afford to hire whole platoon of maids. Why'd he do this? To save some small change?

Son like to cross-dress and this is his own testimony ... wtf

What’s wrong with like to cross dress?Everybody has their own needs

stingy nothing wrong what

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supersonic

Regardless of what the maid is asking for as damages, there was foul play.

and Singapore cannot allow for foul play. Singapore cannot stand for foul play. Singapore will not stand for foul play!

the perpetrators must be investigated and stand trial for misleading the courts. The police who didnt do their jobs well too.

Otherwise, where is Justice??

Lets see.  
 

  • Praise 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supersonic (edited)
1 hour ago, Mockngbrd said:

Hopefully she sues back then we can see show 

MOM should pick this up even if she doesnt sue.  Statements already there.  lets see.     But my guess is that it will be settled out of court and the maid will return home with a smile.  

Edited by Throttle2
↡ Advertisement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×