Jump to content

High Court acquits maid of stealing S$34,000 worth of items from CAG chairman Liew Mun Leong’s home


Ysc3
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Picnic06-Biante15 said:

Not a bad ideal .... [idea]

@Jamesc DT your friend right ? .. [sly]

USA very simple - just winning 4 states will decide who becomes president.

Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.

:grin:

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Throttle2 said:

Any further developments ? 

Got set up inquiry team to probe?

since when CNB reveal what they do behind the scene?

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Jamesc said:

USA very simple - just winning 4 states will decide who becomes president.

Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.

:grin:

It's 6 swing states which matters....add to the above ie Arizona and North Carolina

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/parti-liyani-maid-liew-mun-leong-court-disciplinary-prosecutors-13137394

Parti Liyani files court action to seek disciplinary proceedings against prosecutors in her case

SINGAPORE: Ms Parti Liyani, the former domestic helper of businessman Liew Mun Leong, has taken to court to seek disciplinary proceedings against the prosecutors in her case.

If she is successful, proceedings could be initiated to assess if there was any misconduct by the prosecutors.

...

If the Chief Justice grants Ms Parti leave for an investigation to be made into the complaint of misconduct, he may appoint a disciplinary tribunal. The tribunal will then hear the case and investigate the complaint, before submitting its findings to the Chief Justice. He can dismiss the complaint if the tribunal finds no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action, or give orders to have punishments imposed.

Section 82A is concerned with misconduct by legal service officers or non-practising solicitors. If due cause is shown with proof that the legal service officer is guilty of misconduct befitting their post as an advocate and solicitor, they could be punished.

Penalties include censures, being struck off the roll, penalty of up to S$20,000, or any other order a disciplinary tribunal deems fit.

Edited by Weez911
  • Praise 7
  • Shocked 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Weez911 said:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/parti-liyani-maid-liew-mun-leong-court-disciplinary-prosecutors-13137394

Parti Liyani files court action to seek disciplinary proceedings against prosecutors in her case

SINGAPORE: Ms Parti Liyani, the former domestic helper of businessman Liew Mun Leong, has taken to court to seek disciplinary proceedings against the prosecutors in her case.

If she is successful, proceedings could be initiated to assess if there was any misconduct by the prosecutors.

...

If the Chief Justice grants Ms Parti leave for an investigation to be made into the complaint of misconduct, he may appoint a disciplinary tribunal. The tribunal will then hear the case and investigate the complaint, before submitting its findings to the Chief Justice. He can dismiss the complaint if the tribunal finds no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action, or give orders to have punishments imposed.

Section 82A is concerned with misconduct by legal service officers or non-practising solicitors. If due cause is shown with proof that the legal service officer is guilty of misconduct befitting their post as an advocate and solicitor, they could be punished.

Penalties include censures, being struck off the roll, penalty of up to S$20,000, or any other order a disciplinary tribunal deems fit.

Swee....👍 like.

Edited by Throttle2
  • Praise 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Weez911 said:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/parti-liyani-maid-liew-mun-leong-court-disciplinary-prosecutors-13137394

Parti Liyani files court action to seek disciplinary proceedings against prosecutors in her case

SINGAPORE: Ms Parti Liyani, the former domestic helper of businessman Liew Mun Leong, has taken to court to seek disciplinary proceedings against the prosecutors in her case.

If she is successful, proceedings could be initiated to assess if there was any misconduct by the prosecutors.

...

If the Chief Justice grants Ms Parti leave for an investigation to be made into the complaint of misconduct, he may appoint a disciplinary tribunal. The tribunal will then hear the case and investigate the complaint, before submitting its findings to the Chief Justice. He can dismiss the complaint if the tribunal finds no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action, or give orders to have punishments imposed.

Section 82A is concerned with misconduct by legal service officers or non-practising solicitors. If due cause is shown with proof that the legal service officer is guilty of misconduct befitting their post as an advocate and solicitor, they could be punished.

Penalties include censures, being struck off the roll, penalty of up to S$20,000, or any other order a disciplinary tribunal deems fit.

Hopefully it will not be a case where 2 DPP kena punished and then the whole matter then considered as closed liao lo ... Again , the ikan bilis gets the blame while those on top bo tai chi lo ... 

On 9/11/2020 at 5:54 PM, Chucky2007 said:

 

 

  • Praise 5
  • Shocked 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Hubwee said:

Hopefully it will not be a case where 2 DPP kena punished and then the whole matter then considered as closed liao lo ... Again , the ikan bilis gets the blame while those on top bo tai chi lo ... 

Unfortunately, an earlier decision by the Apex Court ruled that govt and judges cannot be sued for judicial decisions, pointing to judicial immunity under the the Government Proceedings Act (GPA).

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/govt-judges-cannot-be-sued-for-judicial-decisions-apex-court

=============

I'm not sure how the "career" of a judge could be impacted though. There could also be sides to the Parti story that we are not aware of, yet. We will hear from their internal review lor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Weez911 said:

Unfortunately, an earlier decision by the Apex Court ruled that govt and judges cannot be sued for judicial decisions, pointing to judicial immunity under the the Government Proceedings Act (GPA).

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/govt-judges-cannot-be-sued-for-judicial-decisions-apex-court

=============

I'm not sure how the "career" of a judge could be impacted though. There could also be sides to the Parti story that we are not aware of, yet. We will hear from their internal review lor.

Spoken to someone in the law circle and he jokingly replied that worst case , maybe bonus for the year affected lo ... Thats how high up they are lo ... 

  • Angry 1
  • Shocked 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Weez911 said:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/parti-liyani-maid-liew-mun-leong-court-disciplinary-prosecutors-13137394

Parti Liyani files court action to seek disciplinary proceedings against prosecutors in her case

SINGAPORE: Ms Parti Liyani, the former domestic helper of businessman Liew Mun Leong, has taken to court to seek disciplinary proceedings against the prosecutors in her case.

If she is successful, proceedings could be initiated to assess if there was any misconduct by the prosecutors.

...

If the Chief Justice grants Ms Parti leave for an investigation to be made into the complaint of misconduct, he may appoint a disciplinary tribunal. The tribunal will then hear the case and investigate the complaint, before submitting its findings to the Chief Justice. He can dismiss the complaint if the tribunal finds no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action, or give orders to have punishments imposed.

Section 82A is concerned with misconduct by legal service officers or non-practising solicitors. If due cause is shown with proof that the legal service officer is guilty of misconduct befitting their post as an advocate and solicitor, they could be punished.

Penalties include censures, being struck off the roll, penalty of up to S$20,000, or any other order a disciplinary tribunal deems fit.

This one crowdfund I will sappork

  • Praise 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hubwee said:

Spoken to someone in the law circle and he jokingly replied that worst case , maybe bonus for the year affected lo ... Thats how high up they are lo ... 

Then who can remove them? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

Legal Service Commission.

CJ and Supreme Court Judge cannot be removed.

Huh.. Like that for example if they keep doing very bad job and still cannot be removed? Gg man.. At least need to lay out certain criteria on what to be expect and also have avenue to seek to remove from position of certain conditions are not met or sort of ma.. 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...