Singapore Reckless Drivers Part X

[Mooose]

2 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

Then how come no of ppl arrested drops?

2020 have to take into account CB time .. would have fewer drunk driving cases .. so fewer people arrested for drink driving?

[inlinesix]

8 minutes ago, Mooose said:

2020 have to take into account CB time .. would have fewer drunk driving cases .. so fewer people arrested for drink driving?

Then it makes even less sense.

Fewer drunk driving cases but more ppl die from drunk driving cases.

In that case, shouldn’t more enforcement be done?
Especially since ppl drive faster.

[Wildfaye29]

6 hours ago, inlinesix said:

“The cabby of six years had been convicted of similar traffic-related offences, including speeding, in 1996 and 2006, the court heard.”

Rem you are protected by the same f stupid law when you walk on pavement.

I don't walk like a f**king zombie or walk like the whole world needs to stop for me. So I don't need this f**king stupid law to protect me.

It's because of this f**king stupid law that penalises drivers regardless of fault that moulds these f**king brains of these f**king pedestrians that they can walk anywhere anytime because they are protected. 

Edited June 12, 2021 by Wildfaye29
Add info

[inlinesix]

6 minutes ago, Wildfaye29 said:

I don't walk like a f**king zombie or walk like the whole world needs to stop for me. So I don't need this f**king stupid law to protect me.

Don’t complain next time when you are run over by bicycle on pavement.

It is the same f stupid law that don’t protect you.

Lastly, the same f stupid law provides the same protection to you against any vehicle bigger than your car.

I know I know

You don’t need this protection.

Edited June 12, 2021 by inlinesix

[Mooose]

22 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

Then it makes even less sense.

Fewer drunk driving cases but more ppl die from drunk driving cases.

In that case, shouldn’t more enforcement be done?
Especially since ppl drive faster.

i think raw statistics of numbers dont quite tell the whole story ..

fewer cases because CB many didnt drive go out drinking but if less people moving around, less traffic on roads maybe drivers speed more and consequences worse in each case result in more deaths ..

i dont know for sure and i am guessing ..

the statistics dont show whether there was less or more enforcement though ..

[Jamesc]

 

[ER-3682]

1 hour ago, Blueray said:

nowadays courts very lenient, any funny behaviour is go IMH first. gib some chance.

same as the ex-navy lady.

This make sure everybody get a fair Judgement.

[Didu]

20 hours ago, Jamesc said:

 

I thought Merc is equipped with auto e-brake? or is it a purchase option?

[Jamesc]

 

[Hamburger]

If WOT altis sure cross over in time. 

[Ct3833]

22 hours ago, Jamesc said:

 

wow Mercedes used as PHV? I want to drive a merc as well. 

[Ct3833]

1 hour ago, Jamesc said:

 

For once I have to say  bluesg is not he new PMD  , but looks like we was coming quite fast though the turning car was wrong. 

[Ct3833]

6 hours ago, inlinesix said:

No of ppl arrested for drinking goes DOWN

vs

fatal drink driving accident goes UP

============================

Speeding related accidents goes UP

vs

Speeding violations goes DOWN

============================

Something wrong with the stats.

Let me tell you what is wrong,

TP spending more time in the aircon office doing "admin " work , spending less time on the road  catching  drink driving and speeding, so number of related offences  went down, but the reality can be seen from the number  of accidents. 

Why data of running red light  and red light accidents is consistent ? because red light cameras are 24x7,  they do not   spend time in the office. 

The stats is not wrong, it only goes to tell the lack of enforcement. Just go recall how many traffic police or roadblock you see these days, or ever even seen one.

 

Edited June 12, 2021 by Ct3833

[Volvobrick]

Aiyah argue so much, fewer caught becos they also work from home surfing MCF looking for videos to catch culprits. MCF members not hardworking enough, didn't post enough videos. 

[Ct3833]

9 hours ago, Volvobrick said:

The 1% is having a good time in the car? 

I thought the other 1% is looking at the other handphone. 

Edited June 12, 2021 by Ct3833

[Angka]

7 hours ago, Jamesc said:

Hit already he tell you.

Claim my MY insurance.

If anyone kenna hit by MY car, immediately call police and ambulance.

When ambulance come they have to make a police report.

Once police involved they have to impound the car.

The MY driver will have to deal with HIS insurance and the police to get his car back.

Good luck to him.

Seriously? But can just call police? What if he drives away?

[Angka]

9 hours ago, Fitvip said:

This is not the first case where "innocent" driver was convicted for such an offence. Another similar case happened many years ago in South Bridge Road, IIRC.

 

 

This is the stupid law. Why need jail term? Should just fine and ban driving

[Jamesc]

43 minutes ago, Angka said:

Seriously? But can just call police? What if he drives away?

In an accident if you hit someone and injured them and drove off

then its hit and run.

If you injured and call ambulance then its the ambulance driver that will make the police report.

This is my understanding.

Edited June 12, 2021 by Jamesc