Jump to content

ICBM 2 mins and SLBM 15 mins later the World is Screwed


steveluv
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Nuclear-button-U.S.-has-no-way-to-stop-president-s-legal-order?utm_campaign=GL_indo_pacific&utm_medium=email&utm_source=NA_newsletter&utm_content=article_link&del_type=11&pub_date=20210929053000&seq_num=13&si=44594

Nuclear button: U.S. has no way to stop president's legal order
Woodward book 'Peril' sheds light on blind spot of command and control

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.am
A military aide carries the "nuclear football" on the South Lawn of the White House.   © Getty Images
KEN MORIYASU, Nikkei Asia chief desk editorSeptember 29, 2021 00:30 JSTUpdated on September 29, 2021 03:16 JST

NEW YORK -- If a U.S. president decides to launch a nuclear attack, the order is conveyed to a duty officer at the National Military Command Center at the Pentagon. The one-star commander executes the order in roughly a minute.

In the most urgent case, a land-based intercontinental ballistic missile will fire in two minutes. A submarine-launched missile will fire in 15 minutes.

That may be all it takes to end the world as we know it. The president has the sole discretion to authorize the use of nuclear weapons, and once the order is given and acknowledged, there is no way to reverse it.

A new book by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa of The Washington Post sheds light on U.S. nuclear command and control, the procedures under which the devastating weapons would be launched. "Peril" describes a scene that occurred Jan. 8 when Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the highest-ranking officer in the country, summoned senior military officers to review the procedures for launching nuclear weapons.

Milley acknowledged that the president alone could give the order, but told the officers that he -- Milley -- also had to be involved.

"Looking each in the eye, Milley asked the officers to affirm that they had understood," the authors wrote.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.am
A Missile Combat Crew commander practices procedures at Vandenberg Air Force Base. Minuteman III missiles can be fired from silos two minutes after an order is made.    © Reuters

It was two days after supporters of then-President Donald Trump assaulted the Capitol, trying to halt the legal process that would certify Joe Biden as the winner of the November 2020 presidential election.

Milley was inserting himself into the nuclear launch process, likely concerned that an unstable Trump might order an attack.

But the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the principal military "adviser" to the president, the National Security Council and the secretary of defense -- and is not in the chain of command.

"The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is in no way responsible for the execution of military policy as ordered by the president," said Carrie Lee, chair of the department of national security and strategy at the U.S. Army War College.

The nuclear chain of command runs through the president to the duty officer at the war room, and to the launch control centers of America's nuclear triad of ICBMs, ballistic missile submarines and strategic bombers.

On Tuesday, Milley told the Senate Armed Services Committee that he received a call from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Jan. 8, inquiring about the president's ability to launch nuclear weapons.

"I explained to her that the president is the sole nuclear launch authority, and he doesn't launch them alone," Milley said. "There are processes, protocols and procedures in place, and I repeatedly assured her that there is no chance of an illegal, unauthorized or accidental launch."

Milley acknowledged to lawmakers that he is not in the chain of command, but said that as the commander in chief's primary military adviser he is in the "chain of communication."

"The chairman is part of the process to ensure the president is fully informed when determining the use of the world's deadliest weapons," he said.

According to a Congressional Research Service report titled "Defense Primer: Command and control of nuclear forces," when a president considers the nuclear option, the standard procedure would be to participate in an emergency communications conference with the secretary of defense, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other military advisers to assess the situation and consider the retaliatory risks of such an attack.

The president may choose not to hold this conference, or to hold it only with people the president thinks would agree with his or her judgment. This could be the scenario that Milley feared.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.am
U.S. Navy submarine USS Alaska arrives at the Port of Gibraltar. The vessels can fire missiles at a target 15 minutes after an order. (Photo courtesy of the U.S. Navy)

On Jan. 8, the country was without a defense secretary as Trump had fired Mark Esper two months earlier. Christopher Miller, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, was chosen by Trump as the acting secretary.

A president who decides to take the nuclear option would communicate the intention through a device known as the "nuclear football" -- a suitcase carried by a military aide who is always near the leader. The president can choose the target from a book filled with prepared war plans. If the intended target is not in the book, the U.S. Strategic Command, or STRATCOM, will quickly prepare an alternative plan.

When a decision is made, the president identifies himself or herself to military officials at the Pentagon using codes noted on an ID card known as the "biscuit." The order is given, and the weapons are fired.

"Nobody can veto a president's order to release nuclear weapons unless it's illegal," said Vipin Narang, a professor of nuclear security and political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

An attack could be deemed illegal if it violates the international law governing armed conflict, which calls for the principles of distinction, proportionality and necessity. But any plan contained in the war book would have been vetted by Pentagon lawyers and considered legal.

"If the president woke up one morning and said, 'I want to launch a missile at downtown Manhattan,' that's clearly not necessary or proportionate and would be illegal," a congressional source said on background.

In such a case, the duty officer at the National Military Command Center could refuse to comply, saying that the officer lacks the legal authority to carry out that plan.

What Milley might have been suggesting, the congressional source said, is for the duty officer to "put the president on hold, initiate a conference and loop Milley in," especially if the order does not fit with the global threats monitored in the war room.

Slowing the process could be one way to curb a spontaneous nuclear strike order. In a 2017 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Duke University professor Peter Feaver discussed two related scenarios: one where the military wakes up the president, and the other where the president wakes up the military.

If the military wakes up the president and warns of an impending attack, Feaver said, "We all believe that the system would carry out the order that he gave. The electorate on Election Day chose him to make that decision."

But if the president is suggesting nuclear use out of the blue, then many people will question the context of the order and why it is necessary.

"He would require lots of people cooperating with him to make the strike happen, and they would be asking the questions that would slow down that process," Feaver said.

The current rules and norms are remnants of the Cold War, when the president faced the possibility of snap decisions to respond to incoming Soviet missiles. They do not assume the American leader to be irrational or erratic.

In Congress, there have been calls to constrain the president's authority. One bill proposed by Sen. Edward Markey and Rep. Ted Lieu, both Democrats, would prohibit the president from launching a nuclear first strike absent a declaration of war by Congress.

"We cannot continue to give one person the awesome power to end life on our planet as we know it with nuclear weapons," Markey said in January, after reintroducing the bill following the Jan. 6 assault on Capitol Hill.

But the process for a declaration of war by Congress could take weeks -- inappropriate for responding to imminent threats.

Another idea involves the president sharing the authority with others. One option being discussed would require consensus among the president, vice president and speaker of the House of Representatives -- the first two individuals in the presidential chain of succession. Another option calls for the attorney general and the defense secretary to be involved in the decision.

But the speaker of the House and attorney general are not necessarily nuclear weapons experts, nor are they regularly briefed on the security threats the nation faces.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 6
  • Shocked 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Serious topic. Waiting for MCFers to ask the most important question.......

 

 

 

 

........this means COE will drop or not?

 

  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Soya said:

........this means COE will drop or not?

 

no more COE and no more LTA to stop you zhng your car...... ultimate right? 😂

Edited by Ahwhye
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ahwhye said:

no more COE and no more LTA to stop you zhng your car...... ultimate right? 😂

Eradicate covid oso

 

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Sosaria said:

And that's only the US president.

What about Russia, China, and other nuclear powers?

More than enough for all of us to worry about.

China just build 300. 😅

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Arogab said:

I this means end of the world, then US president do what after giving the order? 😄

It's all about comparing dick sizes la....

  • Haha! 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Sosaria said:

As Trump said to Kim:

My red button is BIGGER, and IT WORKS !!!

I help Fatty Kim say to Trump. Bigger button harder to press. Haha

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Arogab said:

I help Fatty Kim say to Trump. Bigger button harder to press. Haha

we got many close call with pressing the button  already , too close for comfort.

still remember this guy Vasily Arkhipov. he save the world by preventing ussr and usa to start a nuke war.

this is just 1 example. .........

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Beregond said:

we got many close call with pressing the button  already , too close for comfort.

still remember this guy Vasily Arkhipov. he save the world by preventing ussr and usa to start a nuke war.

this is just 1 example. .........

I donno if the story is true or not. People today so stupid and easily go press the button meh??

If people know this is going to become "End of the world" then the person who do it must want to end the world lor.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Arogab said:

I this means end of the world, then US president do what after giving the order? 😄

Have a break have a Kit Kat image.png.f5505f9e0c7ce11a77e16c737dd3bbac.png

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...