Beregond Supersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 18 minutes ago, AndrewLee72 said: I think now it's the time to TEST if - by killing 1 person. Can save lives of MANY people 🙂 What say you. U mean killing putin ah . If putin, the US already putting forward the ideal.😅 ↡ Advertisement 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesc Hypersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 4 hours ago, BanCoe said: Wah!!! Gold touched USD2k PER oz today .... dunno whats gonna happen next COE 100k. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volvobrick Supersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 14 minutes ago, Beregond said: U mean killing putin ah . If putin, the US already putting forward the ideal.😅 US's calculation might be totally different - leaving him in charge will give a lot of excuses for sanctions, seizing Russian assets like yachts, villas, gold, cash, and a long fight with Ukraine will weaken Russia tremendously. US doesn't have to risk US soldiers, and only need to provide a few billions worth of weapons to Ukraine, possibly using seized money. Like Afghanistan's. 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playtime Twincharged March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 4 hours ago, BanCoe said: Wah!!! Gold touched USD2k PER oz today .... dunno whats gonna happen next Bitcoin retrace Maybe Russians finish buying or funds depleted Maybe rubble... or ruble no diff...not worth shit liao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 1 minute ago, Playtime said: Bitcoin retrace Maybe Russians finish buying or funds depleted Maybe rubble... or ruble no diff...not worth shit liao Tiagong Us side trying prevent bitcoin Liao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playtime Twincharged March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 (edited) Tio censored This is 1 prc id say is 一条汉子 Edited March 7, 2022 by Playtime 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beregond Supersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Volvobrick said: US's calculation might be totally different - leaving him in charge will give a lot of excuses for sanctions, seizing Russian assets like yachts, villas, gold, cash, and a long fight with Ukraine will weaken Russia tremendously. US doesn't have to risk US soldiers, and only need to provide a few billions worth of weapons to Ukraine, possibly using seized money. Like Afghanistan's. OK my mistake, white house back off liao, 😂 latest update https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-says-it-is-not-advocating-regime-change-russia-2022-03-04/ The White House is not advocating for regime change in Russia, President Joe Biden's spokesperson said on Friday after a U.S. senator advocated for Russians to assassinate President Vladimir Putin. "We are not advocating for killing the leader of a foreign country or regime change. That is not the policy of the United States," White House spokesperson Jen Psaki told reporters. U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, called for someone in Russia to "take this guy out," referring to Putin. Edited March 7, 2022 by Beregond Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewLee72 6th Gear March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 6 minutes ago, Playtime said: Tio censored Ya Sad. WECHAT block him! WeChat = PRC huh 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playtime Twincharged March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 4 minutes ago, Mustank said: Tiagong Us side trying prevent bitcoin Liao I think they have their hands full on tradfi sanctions. It's kinda too hard to enforce btc ban/trade with kyc still not universal. Plus decentralised exchanges common. The sanctions will stay a long time and the common Russian can't pay with btc. Only hodl and hope to survive ruble crash. And at the govt level.. I don't think Russia can go on btc at At state level either 🤔 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 6 minutes ago, AndrewLee72 said: Ya Sad. WECHAT block him! WeChat = PRC huh Spread fake new mah 🤣 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewLee72 6th Gear March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, inlinesix said: Spread fake new mah 🤣 Its ok - He still has Youtube Channel ! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macrosszero Turbocharged March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 15 minutes ago, Playtime said: Tio censored This is 1 prc id say is 一条汉子 Cantonese say, “Seng moke” only. When you’re sitting amongst MUFC supporters in Old Trafford in the SAF stand during their home game, you don’t cheer when the visitors score a goal either… 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlinesix Supersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 Just now, AndrewLee72 said: Its ok - He still has Youtube Channel ! I am not surprised that he is blocked from Wechat. I had an experience of a blackout photo on Wechat moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yishunite Turbocharged March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 25 minutes ago, Playtime said: Tio censored This is 1 prc id say is 一条汉子 Life under great chinese order 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 15 minutes ago, Playtime said: I think they have their hands full on tradfi sanctions. It's kinda too hard to enforce btc ban/trade with kyc still not universal. Plus decentralised exchanges common. The sanctions will stay a long time and the common Russian can't pay with btc. Only hodl and hope to survive ruble crash. And at the govt level.. I don't think Russia can go on btc at At state level either 🤔 Also tiagong china side able to get cheap exports from sanctioned countries so Huat ah Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolicense Turbocharged March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 35 minutes ago, Beregond said: OK my mistake, white house back off liao, 😂 latest update https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-says-it-is-not-advocating-regime-change-russia-2022-03-04/ The White House is not advocating for regime change in Russia, President Joe Biden's spokesperson said on Friday after a U.S. senator advocated for Russians to assassinate President Vladimir Putin. "We are not advocating for killing the leader of a foreign country or regime change. That is not the policy of the United States," White House spokesperson Jen Psaki told reporters. U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, called for someone in Russia to "take this guy out," referring to Putin. lol... of cos must appear gentleman. let the other people say kill him. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D3badge 6th Gear March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 2 hours ago, Victor68 said: You aware what is NATO and you also know Russia has applied to join NATO? You aware the commitment of NATO non expansion? I said already, Singapore is not part of NATO and we are not part of their family matters. We should never urge this war knowing the outcome. That much I have to say. You ask Singapore not to argue as we are not part of NATO matters, but all your post seen to be arguing about this war and NATO blah blah blah 😂 So should we argue or not argue? 🤣🤣🤣 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bsswan 6th Gear March 7, 2022 Share March 7, 2022 53 minutes ago, Beregond said: OK my mistake, white house back off liao, 😂 latest update https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-says-it-is-not-advocating-regime-change-russia-2022-03-04/ The White House is not advocating for regime change in Russia, President Joe Biden's spokesperson said on Friday after a U.S. senator advocated for Russians to assassinate President Vladimir Putin. "We are not advocating for killing the leader of a foreign country or regime change. That is not the policy of the United States," White House spokesperson Jen Psaki told reporters. U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, called for someone in Russia to "take this guy out," referring to Putin. Yeah, of course...... because we trust the American administration more than Putin's 🙄 ↡ Advertisement 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Another term for China's President.
Another term for China's President.
Foreign interference law invoked for the first time
Foreign interference law invoked for the first time
Ridout Road Bungalows Rental Saga
Ridout Road Bungalows Rental Saga
The horrible colleague / office politics thread
The horrible colleague / office politics thread
US blacklists Huawei & affiliates
US blacklists Huawei & affiliates
Parliament 2023
Parliament 2023
Welcome back (in)FAMOUS AMOS!
Welcome back (in)FAMOUS AMOS!