Are you a guru/expert?

[Jamesc]

1 hour ago, RadX said:

she ain't working hard enuf

u still here

Please don't encourage her.

[DOBIEMKZ]

23 minutes ago, Jamesc said:

In life everyone thinks they are smart, they are above average in intelligence, they are experts.

I think half of them are below average in intelligence really.

😯 ... 🤨 ... Your MIL is in which group ?? 🤔   😁
 

[Jamesc]

49 minutes ago, DOBIEMKZ said:

😯 ... 🤨 ... Your MIL is in which group ?? 🤔   😁
 

Know it all.

[Jamesc]

6 hours ago, DOBIEMKZ said:

Sometimes, humans invent things just to kill themselves in the end.

I think its called AI.

Which country is not throwing millions to AI?

Edited January 30, 2023 by Jamesc

[Jamesc]

I think the problem is there is knowledge and there is wisdom.

Experts are people that are very knowledgeable like Mike Tyson in physics.

But he may not have wisdom.

That Elong Must is an expert on rockets and electric cars

but when it comes to wisdom he is an idiot.

So seek knowledge from knowledgeable people

and wisdom from wise people

and know many knowledgeable people have very little wisdom.

Edited January 30, 2023 by Jamesc

[DOBIEMKZ]

15 minutes ago, Jamesc said:

I think the problem is there is knowledge and there is wisdom.

Experts are people that are very knowledgeable like Mike Tyson in physics.

But he may not have wisdom.

That Elong Must is an expert on rockets and electric cars

but when it comes to wisdom he is an idiot.

So seek knowledge from knowledgeable people

and wisdom from wise people

and know many knowledgeable people has very little wisdom.

Your statements are very profound!

I was not wise enough to immediately know what you said.

But the more I read and so the more I know.

And now that I know, I think I am quite wise to know what is being said. 

Edited January 30, 2023 by DOBIEMKZ

[Jamesc]

29 minutes ago, DOBIEMKZ said:

Your statements are very profound!

I was not wise enough to immediately know what you said.

But the more I read and so the more I know.

And now that I know, I think I am quite wise to know what is being said. 

Its very easy.

Knowledge and wisdom are totally different

just like education and training.

A teacher in school teaches our kids sex education

and that's perfectly ok. They maybe virgins and have never have sex

but they teach sex education.

This just means if they have never had sex they cannot be a sex trainer.

I don't teach sex education but I run private courses in sex training.

Discount for any good looking young ladies in MCF that wants to come for training!

 

So knowledge and wisdom is totally different

just like training and education are totally different.

I am sure parents won't be happy if they find a teacher

teaching their daughter sex training instead of sex education!

[Ct3833]

i dont know guru or expert, but I am sure MCF has many sexperts. 

[DOBIEMKZ]

Twitter Is "Verifying" Accounts With AI-Generated Faces

https://futurism.com/twitter-verifying-accounts-ai-faces?fbclid=IwAR15OQv9nZsGvm6gVLHuViAr5DZm6LW3-AqY8H_thXlK0vTXfdmjBFI9Spg

It's only the tip of the iceberg.

Under the leadership of its new CEO Elon Musk, Twitter has settled on keeping its paid "Verified" program via a Twitter Blue subscription, despite plenty of heavy scrutiny ever since Musk took over in November.

While the platform now includes different colored checkmarks for businesses and governments, the blue checkmark — which once indicated that a user's identity had been authenticated — remains a free-for-all, and is now being taken advantage of by nefarious parties armed with AI technologies.

As spotted by Twitter user conspirator0, a swath of "verified" Twitter accounts are sporting AI-generated faces as their profile pictures while pretending to be real people.

And many of them, according to conspirator0's findings, "push specific political agendas," both left and right-leaning — though mostly the latter.

One account under the now suspended handle of cortez_santiage described themselves as a "nationalist," a "paleo-conservative," "anti-liberal," and "anti-cringe." Another found by conspirator0, formerly under the username of Kenoisseur, campaigned to share so-called evidence of "the genocide of whites in America."

Others can be more innocuous, like claiming to be a Harvard grad epidemiologist.

It's unclear how many of these are straight-up bots or anonymous, perfidious humans trying to maintain a more credible face — but our best guess is that it's a mix of both.

"Allowing accounts with fake faces to be 'verified' without even requiring the operators to disclose that the 'face' is artificially generated is a blatantly pro-deception stance," conspirator0 wrote in a tweet.

Many of the accounts, which date back to November — right after Musk's takeover — were eventually suspended. But conspirator0 has since dug up more verified accounts with AI faces that were neither suspended nor deprived of their "verified" status — only using a quick and simple Twitter search of inputting "filter:blue_verified" and tacking on common English words.

Then, to root out the suspect accounts, conspirator0 looked for the telltale signs of faces synthesized using a generative adversarial network (GAN), which they note is used in popular tools like This Person Does Not Exist.

The most prominent and distinguishing feature of unmodified GAN-generated faces is the unmoving placement of the eyes. If you overlay multiple GAN-generated faces, it becomes clear that the portraits weren't naturally taken and cropped. In other words, the eyes almost never deviate.

Other indicators include wonky glasses, nonsensical clothing, and distorted secondary faces in the frame. At least one study has identified inconsistent specular highlights in the corneas of the eyes as an ultimate giveaway.

But in all likelihood, this is simply the tip of the iceberg. These giveaways only apply to unmodified GAN-generated faces. If someone went to the effort of manually fine-tuning them, even just by a touch, they could be even harder to detect.

It's an especially worrying trend since "Legacy" verified accounts — accounts that were verified under the old program that required users to corroborate their identities — still maintain the same blue checkmark.

That runs the risk of having those who are only taking a cursory look at these profiles mistaking them for real people, whether they paid for Twitter Blue or were legacy verified.

Conspirator0 also cites a study published last year in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that found AI face generators "have passed through the uncanny valley and are capable of creating faces that are indistinguishable — and more trustworthy — than real faces."

Anecdotally, of course, you can find many botched likenesses that indicate the contrary, but the most convincing of them will likely go largely unnoticed, and the mere fact that these AI faces look more like professional headshots than terrible selfies also lends them an undue sense of credibility.

In short, what we're witnessing is a confluence of AI's emerging, widespread popularity, its propensity to be abused to spread misinformation, and Musk's decision to let just about anyone brandish a status-signaling badge.

Yet, admittedly, the badges are arguably the least worrying aspect of this developing trend. Once (or if) widely accessible AIs are competent enough, they won't need trivial, digital badges to feign credibility — or maintain a facade of humanity.

[Jamesc]

Right wing white inferiority complex idiots.

[Jamesc]

Twissler haven't gone bankrupt yet huh?

[Benarsenal]

No guru, only gu yu (butter)

[DOBIEMKZ]

[DOBIEMKZ]